Page 2 of 5
Re: Norton v Williams
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 16:37
by Craig14
Old bones Ian wrote:Nice to see the commentators being as one-sided as the Sky team .
They won't criticize the home fighter,
It is pretty one-sided though. Good domestic division the super bantams.
Re: Norton v Williams
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 16:41
by Old bones Ian
yid14 wrote:Old bones Ian wrote:Nice to see the commentators being as one-sided as the Sky team .
They won't criticize the home fighter,
It is pretty one-sided though. Good domestic division the super bantams.
I'd keep Walsh away from Quigg or Frampton for the time being, he needs a few more learning fights. Certainly a good division at the mo
Re: Norton v Williams
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 16:42
by Deno1986
Dean Byrne is a lot better than he showed tonight. He looked flat and had no pop in his punches, more than likely because he has been so inactive and plenty of ring rust has developed. He needs to build on this and start getting a run of fights going. Hopefully he will be out again before Christmas.
Re: Norton v Williams
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 16:46
by Craig14
Old bones Ian wrote:yid14 wrote:Old bones Ian wrote:Nice to see the commentators being as one-sided as the Sky team .
They won't criticize the home fighter,
It is pretty one-sided though. Good domestic division the super bantams.
I'd keep Walsh away from Quigg or Frampton for the time being, he needs a few more learning fights. Certainly a good division at the mo
And Munroe,Kid Ghalhad his older brothers init aswell 8-0 8 k.os.
Re: Norton v Williams
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 16:49
by Old bones Ian
10-0 in round to Walsh, and first time he's been 10 rounds, so a good workout. Plenty to go back home and work on , but showed enough that he make an impact at a higher level.
Liam Richards well done for seeing it through to the end.
Re: Norton v Williams
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 16:51
by Old bones Ian
yid14 wrote:Old bones Ian wrote:yid14 wrote:
It is pretty one-sided though. Good domestic division the super bantams.
I'd keep Walsh away from Quigg or Frampton for the time being, he needs a few more learning fights. Certainly a good division at the mo
And Munroe,Kid Ghalhad his older brothers init aswell 8-0 8 k.os.
Find out about Kid Galahad soon when he takes on Casey.
Re: Norton v Williams
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 17:03
by Baboon
Right, sod it. Norton may be a dull fighter but in a trade off Williams gave THE most boring interview on the Bunce hour....so to save listening to him again after the fight.....c'mon Rob

Re: Norton v Williams
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 17:09
by Baboon
Williams looking bloody awful. Two rounds, barely a punch thrown or landed. Looks terrified.
Re: Norton v Williams
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 17:09
by clintonmcphilbin
wish dickinson could box norton
Re: Norton v Williams
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 17:10
by Old bones Ian
Williams looks completly out of sorts there, his demeanor going back to the corner isn't good
Re: Norton v Williams
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 17:14
by Craig14
The last person I can remember being this unworthy of a british title shot was Jess Harding against Gary Mason. Williams looks awful.
Re: Norton v Williams
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 17:16
by Baboon
This is balls. I'm off to cook my dinner.
*cue fight of the year*
Re: Norton v Williams
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 17:18
by clintonmcphilbin
i never really big my bro up on here but i wish he could fight one theres at least he would put up a fight.
Re: Norton v Williams
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 17:21
by dondada
Wonder why Boxing News said this pile of shite bill was promoted by Al Legedly?
BoxRec has it as something called Queensbury Promotions whereas the Board said it's by Boxing Chat.
Regardless...utterly dire.
Re: Norton v Williams
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 17:22
by LeedsLad
I'm losing the will to live watching this.
Give me Clottey vs Witter anyday!!!!!!!
Re: Norton v Williams
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 17:23
by Craig14
LeedsLad wrote:I'm losing the will to live watching this.
Give me Clottey vs Witter anyday!!!!!!!
It really is a stinker. Come back Johnny Nelson all is forgiven.
Re: Norton v Williams
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 17:34
by Old bones Ian
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Wonder why Boxing News said this pile of shite bill was promoted by Al Legedly rather than Ayling?
I thought you'd be asleep by now mate
Re: Norton v Williams
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 17:36
by dondada
Old bones Ian wrote:Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Wonder why Boxing News said this pile of shite bill was promoted by Al Legedly rather than Ayling?
I thought you'd be asleep by now mate
I'm listening to Carrotcruncher doing the commentary rather than watching...

Re: Norton v Williams
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 17:38
by gasman
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Old bones Ian wrote:Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Wonder why Boxing News said this pile of shite bill was promoted by Al Legedly rather than Ayling?
I thought you'd be asleep by now mate
I'm listening to Carrotcruncher doing the commentary rather than watching...

+1
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Norton v Williams
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 17:39
by Horse
Why are people complaining? We all know Norton is boring, so what were you expecting?
Re: Norton v Williams
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 17:40
by Craig14
Horse wrote:Why are people complaining? We all know Norton is boring, so what were you expecting?
Williams to throw a punch.
Re: Norton v Williams
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 17:40
by dondada
Good to hear Enzo just say after the ninth, "We'd have to see the best three rounds in the history of boxing to make this an entertaining fight"
Good lad
What a steaming heap of excrement this bill has been.
Re: Norton v Williams
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 17:42
by Craig14
That last round really was a disgrace.
Re: Norton v Williams
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 17:43
by damianhucker1
this fight is boring me .
Re: Norton v Williams
Posted: 21 Oct 2011, 17:44
by freddydoesdallas
Is it over yet? I've ended up watching season 4 of the sopranos