Page 2 of 3

Re: Jan. 28th, Auckland, Welliver Rules Supreme

Posted: 29 Jan 2012, 00:06
by Hounddawg
Wow.....no, seriously wow. Promoters should be aware that events like this do nothing but hurt the sport.

Re: Jan. 28th, Auckland, Welliver Rules Supreme

Posted: 29 Jan 2012, 00:49
by Kronkpride
While I didn't see the card, I say bahumbug to you crybabies. Welliver was cutting his teeth as a promotion and for his 1st time out as Running Bear Promotions, there were a heck of a lot of titles on the line. Chauncy defended 3 himself and now Billy Wright is set up for a Dexter Dunworth match for the PABA. 100 years if experience in 1 ring, minus the ref....Cortez could make it 200 in the same ring.

Give credit to a Champion of The People who was going out on a limb to keep in contact with his people and defend his titles. Monte Barrett missed out as he was offered this fight. The Champ had inner ear infections going in that kept him from sparring and getting ready for this. Monte might have been competitive with Chauncy this night. Any other night he is blown out of the building.

Running Bear Rules!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6oimzbFlj8

If you hung around I guarantee you the champ signed you an autograph or took a picture with you.

Re: Jan. 28th, Auckland, Welliver Rules Supreme

Posted: 29 Jan 2012, 01:29
by buster007
it seems u live in fairy land, pmsl.

Re: Jan. 28th, Auckland, Welliver Rules Supreme

Posted: 29 Jan 2012, 01:35
by jehu
Truth is this card was terrible, fights looked staged and ear infections aside the only one being a crybaby was welliver when he couldnt have his way with the stubborn limited black yoyo, im not here to hate but if you were there theres no problem calling the kettle black if its black, i herd the man that was holding the paba belt say if he had a remote hed turn it off and that was at the 4th round of wellivers fight.

Running bear rules what?? you cant be serious. kronk are you paid to make him look good?

Re: Jan. 28th, Auckland, Welliver Rules Supreme

Posted: 29 Jan 2012, 02:07
by Beltane
We all know where "Running Bear" finished up in the end of that old song!

Re: Jan. 28th, Auckland, Welliver Rules Supreme

Posted: 29 Jan 2012, 02:55
by Hounddawg
Scores at the stoppage time: 1:56 | referee: Reg Williams | judge: Steve Miles 85-85 | judge: Laurie Glozier 87-84 | judge: Gary McCrystal 87-84


Chauncey was up on two of the judges scorecards.

Re: Jan. 28th, Auckland, Welliver Rules Supreme

Posted: 29 Jan 2012, 02:57
by Kronkpride
I listened to that song while mining for material. No go. This is a Morphing Running Bear. In China he is a Panda and they flock to him and love him as their HW champ. In the USA he is the Black Bear and he mauls everyone who tries to take his WBC Continental Americas HW Title. If he went up to Canada to beat Big Sky Tye Fields arse for the Native American Boxing Council HW Title he'd be the Grizzly Bear. When he is kicking Povetkins arse in his camp he is the Polar Bear. The Morphing Running Bear is not bound by seasons. He is the most active Running Bear because he also flies. He jumps continent to continent mauling people and calling out Klitschkos.

I don't get paid to make Chauncy look good, most say I make him look bad. He gets paid to make me look good. As with each win the Doubting Thomases are exposed for my entertainment and pleasure. I'm just a hard core fan ever since the day I saw him give us a war against Hoggman John Sargent! Damn what a good fight!

Look at that video or on Chauncy's Facebook at those packed Chinese stadiums. Every seat to the rafters with thousands. I am starting to doubt the integrity of the westerm culture when Chauncy is so much more appreciated by the Easterners. :bow:

Re: Jan. 28th, Auckland, Welliver Rules Supreme

Posted: 29 Jan 2012, 02:58
by Kronkpride
Hounddawg wrote:Scores at the stoppage time: 1:56 | referee: Reg Williams | judge: Steve Miles 85-85 | judge: Laurie Glozier 87-84 | judge: Gary McCrystal 87-84


Chauncey was up on two of the judges scorecards.
That is only through 9 rounds. The tenth saw 2 points taken from Mensah. That sucker was 10-7 if he doesn't run away like an African Girl. Bring Sam Peter or Frans Botha on next. Africans who want to go 12 hard rounds.

Re: Jan. 28th, Auckland, Welliver Rules Supreme

Posted: 29 Jan 2012, 07:08
by Craig14
That's what makes it ridiculous Mensah got docked 2 points for holding, chauncy did more holding! Mensah just kept leaning on him. When break was called he beat Welliver to the punch everytime. He couldn't work him out. Nobody who watched (apart from the judges) had Chauncy ahead, he maybe got a share of the fourth and was better later on but it would be hard to give him a round outright. Kronk you know I'm not a hater I've seen him box a few times now but he was in alot of trouble last night and it was only the fact that Moyoyo kept getting docked points (and probably got wind of the judges scorecards) that he jacked in. As for the guy who paid 25 bucks - I paid 30 :witzend: Never again.

Re: Jan. 28th, Auckland, Welliver Rules Supreme

Posted: 29 Jan 2012, 07:29
by foxdog1923
Kronkpride wrote:Running Bear Rules!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6oimzbFlj8

If you hung around I guarantee you the champ signed you an autograph or took a picture with you.
I think you watch too much movies, you should get out and train.

Mensah does hold a lot in previous fights.

Welliver confirmed what I said earlier, hes just not good enough. Welliver needed to be dominant for worldwide boxing to be impressed.

Like I said before, he needs to fight Leapai. Especially after a stink night of boxing. He needs to show he is a champion.

Re: Jan. 28th, Auckland, Welliver Rules Supreme

Posted: 29 Jan 2012, 08:14
by Tiger hounslow
I was at the fight as I thought this was going to be a good fight. I agree I had mensah ahead as well. He beat him to the punch all night. I'd love to see these 2 guys go again. I've never seen welliver so bad after a fight. He took a good old fashioned beating

Re: Jan. 28th, Auckland, Welliver Rules Supreme

Posted: 29 Jan 2012, 17:48
by Kronkpride
Chauncy Welliver doesn't have to do anything. He has titles he can defend on 4 continents.

The dude had no sparring coming into the Mensah fight and mensah came in prepared. Welliver has a bad ear infection a month or so before the fights so he didn't get his 80 rounds of sparring in. He figured he could take Mensah anyways and he did. It goes down as a stoppage. He was ahead on every card if the round completed. As it was he had a majority of the cards through 9 with a big lead. Even before the points would have came off in 10.

Seth Mitchell is an option, Alex leapai may be 1 too. Jon Banks is on the menu. So is Tyson Fury or David Price. Any guy in the world, including the Klitschko's is possible.

Re: Jan. 28th, Auckland, Welliver Rules Supreme

Posted: 29 Jan 2012, 19:59
by NZ Fighter
I agree a rematch would be awesome. Mensah with more time to prepare would easily make a lean 110kg heavyweight.

Re: Jan. 28th, Auckland, Welliver Rules Supreme

Posted: 29 Jan 2012, 23:21
by buster007
more excuses.

Re: Jan. 28th, Auckland, Welliver Rules Supreme

Posted: 30 Jan 2012, 06:40
by foxdog1923
Kronkpride wrote:Any guy in the world, including the Klitschko's is possible.
The Klitsckos will do unto him like they did with Solis. If Welliver can get a shot at the brothers then so can Mensah. They're about the same level.

Mensah and Welliver 2 would be good and THEN he can move on to Leapai.

Re: Jan. 28th, Auckland, Welliver Rules Supreme

Posted: 30 Jan 2012, 23:37
by NZ Fighter
Agreed. Mensah rematch is a must. Everyone I talk to is saying Mensah was ahead by 2-3rounds but got so frustrated with biased refing and points unneccesarily being taken off that he walked out in the 10th. Chauncy def has to prove himself before moving on to the big boys in OCeania - Tua, Leapai etc. Once there then Klitschkos but I doubt he will get past Oceanias top Heavies.

Mensah - Welliver2 Will be a great fight :TU:

Re: Jan. 28th, Auckland, Welliver Rules Supreme

Posted: 31 Jan 2012, 17:44
by funso banjo baby
the only fight i want to see is

welliver v joey dawejko

its a natural :bag:

Re: Jan. 28th, Auckland, Welliver Rules Supreme

Posted: 31 Jan 2012, 18:49
by Brute
Do you really think Dawejko is past beating up tomato cans?

Re: Jan. 28th, Auckland, Welliver Rules Supreme

Posted: 31 Jan 2012, 19:01
by Brute
foxdog1923 wrote:
Kronkpride wrote:Any guy in the world, including the Klitschko's is possible.
The Klitsckos will do unto him like they did with Solis. If Welliver can get a shot at the brothers then so can Mensah. They're about the same level.

Mensah and Welliver 2 would be good and THEN he can move on to Leapai.
Mensah is a cruiserweight. At heavyweight he has only beaten also-rans.

Re: Jan. 28th, Auckland, Welliver Rules Supreme

Posted: 02 Feb 2012, 23:15
by Grant
jehu wrote:Hi first comment on this forum.. but i had to say something never seen such a horrible card of boxing. Rohit won in 15 seconds 10 seconds for the count. Welliver honestly stuggled bad with a man who leads his punches with his head and throws 5 lead rights in a row was his best combo and a lead uppercut everytime they come off the break. Skill wise there was no form at all , welliver was untidy in his combos didnt sit on any of his punches and was getting hit by telegraphed punches for 10 rounds till mensah quited. Might be an off night for welliver but if you cant dominate this guy what you ganna do when you step it up.?? the 50 year old yank could put both them a way. All the best keep up the comedy show at $25 a pop.
Welcome aboard Jehu, keep posting.

Re: Jan. 28th, Auckland, Welliver Rules Supreme

Posted: 12 Feb 2012, 20:38
by NZ Fighter
I recon Welliver should rematch Moyoyo Mensah on the Cameron vs Barrett card. My thinking is this the winner would then be able to call out Shane or Monte and they would of had the necessary exposure to the boxing public to do so :TU: . Could generate interest.
Chauncy what do you think? Would be good if could happen. Any thoughts?

Re: Jan. 28th, Auckland, Welliver Rules Supreme

Posted: 12 Feb 2012, 21:10
by Brute
NZ Fighter wrote:I recon Welliver should rematch Moyoyo Mensah on the Welliver vs Barrett card. My thinking is this the winner would then be able to call out Shane or Monte and they would of had the necessary exposure to the boxing public to do so :TU: . Could generate interest.
Chauncy what do you think? Would be good if could happen. Any thoughts?
Do you really thinks Mensah should fight Welliver again after his hiding last time? ( I take it you mean the Cameron/Barrett card).

Re: Jan. 28th, Auckland, Welliver Rules Supreme

Posted: 12 Feb 2012, 23:41
by NZ Fighter
Brute wrote:
NZ Fighter wrote:I recon Welliver should rematch Moyoyo Mensah on the Welliver vs Barrett card. My thinking is this the winner would then be able to call out Shane or Monte and they would of had the necessary exposure to the boxing public to do so :TU: . Could generate interest.
Chauncy what do you think? Would be good if could happen. Any thoughts?
Do you really thinks Mensah should fight Welliver again after his hiding last time? ( I take it you mean the Cameron/Barrett card).
Yes I corrected that did meanCameron/ Barrett. The fight Iseen was a close fight with Welliver leaving themost marked up I have ever seen him. A rematch would be great IMO

Re: Jan. 28th, Auckland, Welliver Rules Supreme

Posted: 13 Feb 2012, 06:26
by Chauncy
NZ Fighter wrote:I recon Welliver should rematch Moyoyo Mensah on the Cameron vs Barrett card. My thinking is this the winner would then be able to call out Shane or Monte and they would of had the necessary exposure to the boxing public to do so :TU: . Could generate interest.
Chauncy what do you think? Would be good if could happen. Any thoughts?
He was the first name we brought up to Higgins as it would make for great tv but Higgins said he needed a bigger name to sell to the Aussie/NZ, and I guess this will also be shown in America. He gave me 3 names and we are working off of them, but according to Higgins should Barrett win over Shane, and I win in the co-main, me and Barrett square off next. But back to the question, Higgins shot down the Yoyo fight.

Re: Jan. 28th, Auckland, Welliver Rules Supreme

Posted: 13 Feb 2012, 12:31
by convict
Chauncy wrote:
NZ Fighter wrote:I recon Welliver should rematch Moyoyo Mensah on the Cameron vs Barrett card. My thinking is this the winner would then be able to call out Shane or Monte and they would of had the necessary exposure to the boxing public to do so :TU: . Could generate interest.
Chauncy what do you think? Would be good if could happen. Any thoughts?
He was the first name we brought up to Higgins as it would make for great tv but Higgins said he needed a bigger name to sell to the Aussie/NZ, and I guess this will also be shown in America. He gave me 3 names and we are working off of them, but according to Higgins should Barrett win over Shane, and I win in the co-main, me and Barrett square off next. But back to the question, Higgins shot down the Yoyo fight.
So why not put your hand up for a fight with Robert Helenius, You are rated high in the WBO - so a fight for the WBO inter continental could be made?. Helenius looked shit in his last fight and you would prob make him look worse. Any returns to Germany?