Re: Sonny Liston V Jerry Quarry 1970
Posted: 17 Jun 2017, 14:43
The term "bum" can be likened to the the term "great" ... Many people use both terms loosely -- bum to include amateurish swingers like Wepner, Bobick, Bucceroni, Dunn, Lubbers, Tangstad, Kirkman, Zech, Rush, O'Halloran, Saverese, Molina, McNeeley, McBride, Paychek, Hoffman, Sosnowski, Price, etc. -- guys who were good enough to achieve a certain amount of fame, but as soon as they hit the big time fell straight through their asses.
Some use "great" to include top contenders who repeatedly fail at the world level -- such as Quarry, Folley, Machen, Satterfield, Nova, Shavers, Tua, Grant, Guinn, Donald, Whyte, Scott, Chambers, etc. -- boxers who appear to have skills, power, and other assets, but can't get over the hump against the best.
Wepner was broadly lacking in skills, strength, speed, power, balance, sharpness, etc. He was far from being visually impressive in his fights. He had some natural assets for a Heavyweight boxer in the way of height, weight, reach, and physical toughness. He never developed them into a game that took him beyond the status of a crude, brawling journeyman. He got a title shot and got the trash beaten out of him. That's were his fame comes from.
Some use "great" to include top contenders who repeatedly fail at the world level -- such as Quarry, Folley, Machen, Satterfield, Nova, Shavers, Tua, Grant, Guinn, Donald, Whyte, Scott, Chambers, etc. -- boxers who appear to have skills, power, and other assets, but can't get over the hump against the best.
Wepner was broadly lacking in skills, strength, speed, power, balance, sharpness, etc. He was far from being visually impressive in his fights. He had some natural assets for a Heavyweight boxer in the way of height, weight, reach, and physical toughness. He never developed them into a game that took him beyond the status of a crude, brawling journeyman. He got a title shot and got the trash beaten out of him. That's were his fame comes from.