Page 2 of 2

Re: Where does Khan go if he loses ?

Posted: 30 Mar 2012, 21:24
by DIRT SUGAR
.... and Khan had points taken away yet Peterson was allowed to use his head, punch low and he also did his fair share of pushing but wasn't warned once. Crock of shit officiating inside and outside the ring.

Sad thing is it was a brilliant fight and both lads' efforts were overshadowed by the post-fight rumpus.

The rematch should be another cracker as their styles mesh very well! :box:

Re: Where does Khan go if he loses ?

Posted: 30 Mar 2012, 21:39
by reggaereggae
DIRT SUGAR wrote:.... and Khan had points taken away yet Peterson was allowed to use his head, punch low and he also did his fair share of pushing but wasn't warned once. Crock of shit officiating inside and outside the ring.

Sad thing is it was a brilliant fight and both lads' efforts were overshadowed by the post-fight rumpus.

The rematch should be another cracker as their styles mesh very well! :box:
I totally agree. That's why I find it odd that Khan's such a big (4-1 on) favourite for this fight...

Re: Where does Khan go if he loses ?

Posted: 31 Mar 2012, 13:33
by desperados
not the end of the line for khan if he loses - he's still a huge draw. Who wouldnt watch a Khan fight? His fights are always exciting as hell - he'll be in a few more FOTY contenders in the newxt few years.

Re: Where does Khan go if he loses ?

Posted: 01 Apr 2012, 13:16
by loaded_gloves
Khan lost the first fight because he is apparently an on top fighter and has no boxing brain to fall back on when things don't go his way, evidenced in the late rounds versus Maidana and the whole fight versus Campbell. He doesn't seem to be much of a thinking fighter like his stable mate Pac Man.

I for one think Campbell will beat him again, but Joe Cortez, the judges and HBO will unite to ensure a picture of Khan 'dominating and outpointing' Campbell to regain his titles is painted.

If Khan loses officially his ego might well go into meltdown. He doesn't appear to live in reality.

Re: Where does Khan go if he loses ?

Posted: 01 Apr 2012, 13:20
by Dioufy
loaded_gloves wrote:Khan lost the first fight because he is apparently an on top fighter and has no boxing brain to fall back on when things don't go his way, evidenced in the late rounds versus Maidana and the whole fight versus Campbell. He doesn't seem to be much of a thinking fighter like his stable mate Pac Man.

I for one think Campbell will beat him again, but Joe Cortez, the judges and HBO will unite to ensure a picture of Khan 'dominating and outpointing' Campbell to regain his titles is painted.

If Khan loses officially his ego might well go into meltdown. He doesn't appear to live in reality.
He won't beat Campbell - I gurantee it.

Re: Where does Khan go if he loses ?

Posted: 01 Apr 2012, 13:38
by loaded_gloves
Oh dear I was mixing names up with Nate Campbell. Poor form!

Re: Where does Khan go if he loses ?

Posted: 02 Apr 2012, 15:31
by Finn
I cant see khan losing, i actually think it might be an early stoppage this time. He just needs to calm down and put more power into his shots.

Re: Where does Khan go if he loses ?

Posted: 02 Apr 2012, 15:48
by Trojans44
Love the unwarranted assumption that khan is actually better than Peterson.

Re: Where does Khan go if he loses ?

Posted: 02 Apr 2012, 15:53
by Finn
Trojans44 wrote:Love the unwarranted assumption that khan is actually better than Peterson.
Its not unwarranted peterson was lucky he was fighting at home, and khan did all the damage. When khan sat on his punches and calmed down a bit he was hurting peterson. Unless you are under the assuption that peterson has more potential than khan and is going to be the improved fighter when they meet again.

Re: Where does Khan go if he loses ?

Posted: 02 Apr 2012, 16:03
by Datsue
Bolton.

Re: Where does Khan go if he loses ?

Posted: 02 Apr 2012, 16:08
by Finn
desperados wrote:not the end of the line for khan if he loses - he's still a huge draw. Who wouldnt watch a Khan fight? His fights are always exciting as hell - he'll be in a few more FOTY contenders in the newxt few years.
true but i think if he loses then he is unlikely to become a great, more like an ortiz type character.

Re: Where does Khan go if he loses ?

Posted: 02 Apr 2012, 17:51
by desperados
kingfinn wrote:
Trojans44 wrote:Love the unwarranted assumption that khan is actually better than Peterson.
Its not unwarranted peterson was lucky he was fighting at home, and khan did all the damage. When khan sat on his punches and calmed down a bit he was hurting peterson. Unless you are under the assuption that peterson has more potential than khan and is going to be the improved fighter when they meet again.

peterson was lucky? how so?

As for Khan doing all the damage, if so, then why was he the 1 on his bike? Khan had no answer for his relentless pressure and resorted to fouling to get Peterson off him. I don't contest that Peterson was hurt on occassion (more late on, he wasnt hurt by the 2 controversial knockdowns) but Khan was the 1 who looked more likely to get stopped.

Re: Where does Khan go if he loses ?

Posted: 02 Apr 2012, 17:56
by keithmoonhangover
Up a weight.

Re: Where does Khan go if he loses ?

Posted: 02 Apr 2012, 18:28
by Finn
desperados wrote:
kingfinn wrote:
Trojans44 wrote:Love the unwarranted assumption that khan is actually better than Peterson.
Its not unwarranted peterson was lucky he was fighting at home, and khan did all the damage. When khan sat on his punches and calmed down a bit he was hurting peterson. Unless you are under the assuption that peterson has more potential than khan and is going to be the improved fighter when they meet again.

peterson was lucky? how so?

As for Khan doing all the damage, if so, then why was he the 1 on his bike? Khan had no answer for his relentless pressure and resorted to fouling to get Peterson off him. I don't contest that Peterson was hurt on occassion (more late on, he wasnt hurt by the 2 controversial knockdowns) but Khan was the 1 who looked more likely to get stopped.
When did khan look likely to be stopped, he wasnt even hurt? peterson won on points khan lost from deductions, khan wouldnt have been deducted those point anywhere else in the world, that makes peterson lucky to win. Petersons face was a mess after the fight - khan had a bad night peterson had the fight of his life.

Re: Where does Khan go if he loses ?

Posted: 02 Apr 2012, 18:48
by desperados
kingfinn wrote:
desperados wrote:
kingfinn wrote: Its not unwarranted peterson was lucky he was fighting at home, and khan did all the damage. When khan sat on his punches and calmed down a bit he was hurting peterson. Unless you are under the assuption that peterson has more potential than khan and is going to be the improved fighter when they meet again.

peterson was lucky? how so?

As for Khan doing all the damage, if so, then why was he the 1 on his bike? Khan had no answer for his relentless pressure and resorted to fouling to get Peterson off him. I don't contest that Peterson was hurt on occassion (more late on, he wasnt hurt by the 2 controversial knockdowns) but Khan was the 1 who looked more likely to get stopped.
When did khan look likely to be stopped, he wasnt even hurt? peterson won on points khan lost from deductions, khan wouldnt have been deducted those point anywhere else in the world, that makes peterson lucky to win. Petersons face was a mess after the fight - khan had a bad night peterson had the fight of his life.
1. he was hurt, imo he was hurt more in this fight than he was in the maidana fight.

2. the point deductiosn were fair, and if another ref in another city didnt deduct them, he wouldnt be doign his job properly. I cant remember the last time i seen a fighter foul so often & consistantly as Khan in this fight. He simply wasn't for taking the Ref's warnings either, rightf rom the word go the ref was telling Khan "stop pushing" "stop pushing" "stop pushing" - Khan blatantly ignored him, even after 1 point deduction, and further numerous warnings, he KEPT on doing it. The ref is there for a reason.

Re: Where does Khan go if he loses ?

Posted: 02 Apr 2012, 19:13
by Finn
desperados wrote:
kingfinn wrote:
desperados wrote:
peterson was lucky? how so?

As for Khan doing all the damage, if so, then why was he the 1 on his bike? Khan had no answer for his relentless pressure and resorted to fouling to get Peterson off him. I don't contest that Peterson was hurt on occassion (more late on, he wasnt hurt by the 2 controversial knockdowns) but Khan was the 1 who looked more likely to get stopped.
When did khan look likely to be stopped, he wasnt even hurt? peterson won on points khan lost from deductions, khan wouldnt have been deducted those point anywhere else in the world, that makes peterson lucky to win. Petersons face was a mess after the fight - khan had a bad night peterson had the fight of his life.
1. he was hurt, imo he was hurt more in this fight than he was in the maidana fight.

2. the point deductiosn were fair, and if another ref in another city didnt deduct them, he wouldnt be doign his job properly. I cant remember the last time i seen a fighter foul so often & consistantly as Khan in this fight. He simply wasn't for taking the Ref's warnings either, rightf rom the word go the ref was telling Khan "stop pushing" "stop pushing" "stop pushing" - Khan blatantly ignored him, even after 1 point deduction, and further numerous warnings, he KEPT on doing it. The ref is there for a reason.
im not sure what planet you're on khan wasnt hurt, he especially wasnt hurt anywhere near to how he was in the maidana fight. Also the best refs in the world like smoger have already said they wouldnt have deducted a point, the ref had also told peterson to stop leading with this head and threatened to deduct a point but only penalised khan. Can you name me a title fight where a fighter was deducted a point for pushing like that never mind 2? The ref was poor khan took the fight too lightly Peterson did very well but he was lucky to get the nod and its unlikely to happen again. thats the long and short of it.