Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11808
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Post by Old bones Ian »

steve689 wrote:Didn't see the end of the Byrne-Holmes fight but Byrne isn't a bad fella, must have got a bit emotional. He must be feeling his career ebbing away. This is the guy that Freddie Roach once said was world title class. I know he's not eligible but hypothetically, would he win a British title?
I think he lacks a bit of 'man strength' , he doesn't seem strong enough to hold people off. But also he would always be in a good fight
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Post by TheCobra »

Webb dominating this 11th, Hall psycholigaclly looked floored by the fact that he thought it was a 10 rounder. Daft sod, if he had got on the internet and checked boxrec he'd have known it was a 12 rounder!
smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Re: Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Post by smoggy7188 »

webb up by 1 for me although youre right when you say he is prancing around on the back foot too much.
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Post by TheCobra »

Could end up a draw this in my eyes.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Post by steve689 »

"People are standing on their feet and cheering"....and why the hell not, this is amazing stuff.
smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Re: Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Post by smoggy7188 »

webb by two for me.
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Post by TheCobra »

Smith got it 8-4 to Webb? I'm sorry I'm not seeing that. I've got it a draw!
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Post by steve689 »

That was a split decision wasn't it the eejit.
smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Re: Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Post by smoggy7188 »

What the hell was Parris watching? 117-112 Hall? wtf
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Post by Horse »

steve689 wrote:That was a split decision wasn't it the eejit.
Burdis is incompetent.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11808
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Post by Old bones Ian »

jesus, at least don't let the boxer look over your shoulder when calling the fight result. It was a split decision as well. Good god is that the best caller we have in the country!!!!!
broomy7s
Cruiserweight
Posts: 971
Joined: 19 May 2011, 07:53

Re: Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Post by broomy7s »

I had it the same as Davies, 115-114, not edge of your seat stuff but an highly engrossing fight.
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Post by TheCobra »

I had a sneaky bet at the end on the draw at 20s on betfair, was praying for it to be a draw! Hall did well for me, Webb sneaked it really, crazy swing on the scorecards.
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

TheCobra wrote:Smith got it 8-4 to Webb? I'm sorry I'm not seeing that. I've got it a draw!
"I'm not scoring this but if Hall wins this round Webb wins it by 1" surely that's his way of saying he is scoring it...

What a farce this all was the majority/split and 10/12 rounds...eurgh
smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Re: Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Post by smoggy7188 »

Why was Hall/Carslaw 10 and this 12?
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Post by steve689 »

Horse wrote:
steve689 wrote:That was a split decision wasn't it the eejit.
Burdis is incompetent.
At least Richard Keys put him right. Well, he tried to and still got it wrong.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Post by Horse »

steve689 wrote:At least Richard Keys put him right. Well, he tried to and still got it wrong.
Keys is incompetent as well.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11808
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Post by Old bones Ian »

steve689 wrote:
Horse wrote:
steve689 wrote:That was a split decision wasn't it the eejit.
Burdis is incompetent.
At least Richard Keys put him right. Well, he tried to and still got it wrong.
If Richard Keys is putting Burdis right about boxing, then Burdis don't have a clue!
smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Re: Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Post by smoggy7188 »

Buncey ripped into Keys after the whole sexism row and now he is all over him.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Post by Horse »

Have they shown the Saunders fight yet (no spoilers, please)?
smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Re: Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Post by smoggy7188 »

If you mean BJ Saunders then no.
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

Horse wrote:Have they shown the Saunders fight yet (no spoilers, please)?
Which Saunders?
broomy7s
Cruiserweight
Posts: 971
Joined: 19 May 2011, 07:53

Re: Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Post by broomy7s »

Horse wrote:Have they shown the Saunders fight yet (no spoilers, please)?

Bradley yes, Billy joe no
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Post by Horse »

iamasadlittleboy wrote:Which Saunders?
Is there more than one fighting?
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Matthew Hall vs Sam Webb

Post by Horse »

broomy7s wrote:Bradley yes, Billy joe no
Okay, thanks.
Post Reply