BoxRec

keithmoonhangover wrote:

iamasadlittleboy wrote:

clopixolacuphase wrote: First of all, there is surely no way this bill gets made. Second, if by some miracle Allegedly put that show together and you're not into it... What the eff is up with you? I'd be ringside

I'm not against the BILL just again Haye v Chisora. Mitchell v Burns would get me interested, I wouldn't be convinced that Groves would actually turn up for a fight and Cleverly v Shuktoksy? I'd imagine I'd have sex with Kelly Brook a long time before that fight gets made.

Haye didn't fleece anyone. He won the title, then defended against his mandatory and then he had a well deserved mandatory. Then he had the guts to step up and fight the best heavyweight in the world, when he could easily have gone the easy route and fought Holyfield for big bucks in Vegas.

I'm a huge boxing fan, but there was no way I was paying a penny to see Haye-Harrison.

Yes, the Klitschko fight was a stinker, but then most of Wlad's fights are.

You not paying for Haye-Harrison doesn't mean the casual public didn't. In fact it seems like a lot of people DID pay for it and where very unhappy about it. The Klitschko fight was a stinker but to then go "it my toe boohoo" was bull and summed up Haye's entire reign at Heavyweight-Disappointing. He won a title yes-in a stinker that he blamed on a bad hand, defended against an undeserving mandatory, defended in a joke voluntary and then limped around against the best heavyweight, at least go out on your effing sheild.

1. Let's see anyone fight a 7' 4" Russian and make it look good.
2. It didn't matter if Ruiz was an undeserving mandatory, Haye had no choice but to fight him or get stripped.
3. Harrison was the one that didn't try and win the fight, not Haye.
4. Haye lost fair and aquare to the best Heavyweight on the planet.

Get a grip man.

Valuev is officially listed as 7'. Every time I heard Haye say 7'2" I cringed. Now he's 7'4"?

keithmoonhangover wrote:

iamasadlittleboy wrote:

clopixolacuphase wrote: First of all, there is surely no way this bill gets made. Second, if by some miracle Allegedly put that show together and you're not into it... What the eff is up with you? I'd be ringside

I'm not against the BILL just again Haye v Chisora. Mitchell v Burns would get me interested, I wouldn't be convinced that Groves would actually turn up for a fight and Cleverly v Shuktoksy? I'd imagine I'd have sex with Kelly Brook a long time before that fight gets made.

Haye didn't fleece anyone. He won the title, then defended against his mandatory and then he had a well deserved mandatory. Then he had the guts to step up and fight the best heavyweight in the world, when he could easily have gone the easy route and fought Holyfield for big bucks in Vegas.

I'm a huge boxing fan, but there was no way I was paying a penny to see Haye-Harrison.

Yes, the Klitschko fight was a stinker, but then most of Wlad's fights are.

You not paying for Haye-Harrison doesn't mean the casual public didn't. In fact it seems like a lot of people DID pay for it and where very unhappy about it. The Klitschko fight was a stinker but to then go "it my toe boohoo" was bull and summed up Haye's entire reign at Heavyweight-Disappointing. He won a title yes-in a stinker that he blamed on a bad hand, defended against an undeserving mandatory, defended in a joke voluntary and then limped around against the best heavyweight, at least go out on your effing sheild.

1. Let's see anyone fight a 7' 4" Russian and make it look good.
2. It didn't matter if Ruiz was an undeserving mandatory, Haye had no choice but to fight him or get stripped.
3. Harrison was the one that didn't try and win the fight, not Haye.
4. Haye lost fair and aquare to the best Heavyweight on the planet.

Get a grip man.

1-Holyfield looked much better against Valuev than Haye, not only did Holyfield throw more, land more etc but he also didn't run around in what resembled a track event more than a boxing contest, so did Chagaev...
2-Your right he didn't have any choice, doesn't mean we should be defending it or the WBA's link with Ruiz which from the time Lewis "sold" the belt to the Haye fight was disgusting.
3-Harrison didn't try because he was shitting his pants, Haye did bugger all for 2 rounds. IF Wladimir fought Harrison with the same apprehensive manner we'd be calling it a stinker as well, heck Moremeck put up a better effort against Wlad that Harrison did against Haye.
4-Yes he lost fair and square, did I ever claim otherwise? I just thought the whole toe bollocks was erm..well bollocks. I'm sorry but I don't reward guys who I feel rip me off, I don't defend loud mouths who fail to back up their talk and most of all I don't defend guys who don't deserve defending.

Valuev never stops growing

clopixolacuphase wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:

iamasadlittleboy wrote: I'm not against the BILL just again Haye v Chisora. Mitchell v Burns would get me interested, I wouldn't be convinced that Groves would actually turn up for a fight and Cleverly v Shuktoksy? I'd imagine I'd have sex with Kelly Brook a long time before that fight gets made.
You not paying for Haye-Harrison doesn't mean the casual public didn't. In fact it seems like a lot of people DID pay for it and where very unhappy about it. The Klitschko fight was a stinker but to then go "it my toe boohoo" was bull and summed up Haye's entire reign at Heavyweight-Disappointing. He won a title yes-in a stinker that he blamed on a bad hand, defended against an undeserving mandatory, defended in a joke voluntary and then limped around against the best heavyweight, at least go out on your effing sheild.

1. Let's see anyone fight a 7' 4" Russian and make it look good.
2. It didn't matter if Ruiz was an undeserving mandatory, Haye had no choice but to fight him or get stripped.
3. Harrison was the one that didn't try and win the fight, not Haye.
4. Haye lost fair and aquare to the best Heavyweight on the planet.

Get a grip man.

Valuev is officially listed as 7'. Every time I heard Haye say 7'2" I cringed. Now he's 7'4"?

Alright he's 7 foot tall, I was trying to make a point, not list his accurate height.

Haye will stop him in the mid rounds, if we have to put up with this fight to get Haye/Vit then so be it.

keithmoonhangover wrote:
1. Let's see anyone fight a 7' 4" Russian and make it look good.

"It" being the fight? It was dull as fornicate.
2. It didn't matter if Ruiz was an undeserving mandatory, Haye had no choice but to fight him or get stripped.

3. Harrison was the one that didn't try and win the fight, not Haye.

The same Haye who did literally nothing until the third round?

4. Haye lost fair and aquare to the best Heavyweight on the planet.

He also threw himself onto the floor more times than he threw a punch and I'm not being facetious. He didn't even try.

Get a grip man.

[/quote]

Ooh Matron.

smoggy7188 wrote:Haye will stop him in the mid rounds, if we have to put up with this fight to get Haye/Vit then so be it.

I actually think it would be a good fight for haye to prove a point, a lot of people especially the yanks think haye and chisora are on the same level and will have shock when haye demolishes chisora early. It would then create a massive amount of interest and pressure in creating a vitali fight.

I see Haye bashing Chisora up badly in this one. He's great against guys his own size and very aggressive. It's only against giants that Haye boxes negatively (Valuev, Klitschko, Harrison).

SteveDow wrote:I see Haye bashing Chisora up badly in this one. He's great against guys his own size and very aggressive. It's only against giants that Haye boxes negatively (Valuev, Klitschko, Harrison).

I think so too it will be like Haye v Ruiz was.

I would definately have interest in seeing Haye beat Fury and Chisora, basically clear up domestically then try a Klitschko.

Would casuals fans bother with Haye again. The only way if thier another incident at weigh inn. It would not be licenced by the board if it happens in UK.

leforge wrote:Would casuals fans bother with Haye again. The only way if thier another incident at weigh inn. It would not be licenced by the board if it happens in UK.

The casual fans will aways get caught up in the hype. Its the hardcore fans doing the complaining and despite what they say they will all be watching.

leforge wrote:Would casuals fans bother with Haye again.

Your joking aren't you , if this fight happens everyone will want to see it. The press conferance brawl is the most watched fight of the year. Everyone with a half interest in boxing will want to see it.

Kingfinn and Keith still sucking on Haye chod.

Karl Jade wrote:Kingfinn and Keith still sucking on Haye chod.

Momentarily struck by morbid curiosity (whether he was named after a cool old fighter I'd never heard of or something), I stuck Karl Jade into Google.

Karl, could this be you?

http://www.facebook.com/people/Karl-Jad ... 2502334441

Small matter of licenses could be an issue if it were to be staged in the UK.

Povetkin/Rahman is on the same bill.

Sky Sports News are running the story this morning that it's going to be at Upton Park.

keithmoonhangover wrote: 4. Haye lost fair and aquare to the best Heavyweight on the planet.

If he'd have had a real go and lost he would have come away with a lot of credit. He didn't. The irony being that in the fleeting moments early in the contest when he was aggressive, he had little bits of success.

If Haye wants Vitali, this is how he gets him. Great stuff.

clopixolacuphase wrote:

Karl Jade wrote:Kingfinn and Keith still sucking on Haye chod.

Momentarily struck by morbid curiosity (whether he was named after a cool old fighter I'd never heard of or something), I stuck Karl Jade into Google.

Karl, could this be you?

http://www.facebook.com/people/Karl-Jad ... 2502334441

King Geedorah wrote:I like this fight in purely boxing terms, but if the BBBoC sanction it there are serious questions raised about how you can confidently announce a fight when one guy is banned without getting a heads up from the Board. On the other hand, if it is sanctioned by proxy then it creates a dangerous precedent that could be bad for the sport. On the middle finger, eff it, there's controversy in them thar hills -- whoop, whoop.

If it sanctioned by another board give it less than a year we have two boxing boards in the UK, then if that happens another British title. The fight should only happen if board approve.

MachoMan09 wrote:

leforge wrote:

King Geedorah wrote:I like this fight in purely boxing terms, but if the BBBoC sanction it there are serious questions raised about how you can confidently announce a fight when one guy is banned without getting a heads up from the Board. On the other hand, if it is sanctioned by proxy then it creates a dangerous precedent that could be bad for the sport. On the middle finger, eff it, there's controversy in them thar hills -- whoop, whoop.

If it sanctioned by another board give it less than a year we have two boxing boards in the UK, then if that happens another British title. The fight should only happen if board approve.

Maybe that's the plan? The owners of BN may effectively choose to go down the UFC line of having their own fighters, titles, rules, etc...

If FW could pull it off i wouldnt be opposed to it, i like the idea of having a high quality UFC style body in boxing.