BoxRec

So was this on sky sports news? And has it come from FW or haye? Will believe it when I see it

wazza and fat dan

smoggy7188 wrote:wazza and fat dan

Has Warren actually said it?

he is hinting very very stronly

smoggy7188 wrote:he is hinting very very stronly

I bet it does not happen. I happily pay to see it though bt prefer it on british boxing board show otherwise I can see WBU.WBF fights being allowed.

Datsue wrote:It's a disgrace/fleecing the public/undermining the board/Haye's a coward/Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells/I'd probably go to this, actually/I blame George Groves.

That is all.

wtf.

Rival promoter Barry Hearn believes this fight should not happen

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... fight.html

Bennyblanco wrote:So was this on sky sports news? And has it come from FW or haye? Will believe it when I see it

Steve Bunce was building up some "big announcement" to be made tomorrow on his Boxing Hour show, so could this be it? Or will it be a deal with Hatton Promotions?

(Or George Groves to fight Mayweather and Pacquiao on the same night...)

DMMA wrote:

Bennyblanco wrote:So was this on sky sports news? And has it come from FW or haye? Will believe it when I see it

Steve Bunce was building up some "big announcement" to be made tomorrow on his Boxing Hour show, so could this be it? Or will it be a deal with Hatton Promotions?

(Or George Groves to fight Mayweather and Pacquiao on the same night...)

The big annoucement could be Mitchell v Burns!

Final round wrote:Rival promoter Barry Hearn believes this fight should not happen

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... fight.html

I'm no expert and correct me if I'm wrong but didn't Barry Hearn give John Higgins the chance to play snooker again after match fixing?

Final round wrote:Rival promoter Barry Hearn believes this fight should not happen

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... fight.html

Hearn would give his right arm to be promoting a fight like this and anyone who believes his indignation over this fight is very naive.

Final round wrote:Rival promoter Barry Hearn believes this fight should not happen

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... fight.html

Hearn would give his right arm to be promoting a fight like this and anyone who believes his indignation over this fight is very naive.

Bennyblanco wrote:

Final round wrote:Rival promoter Barry Hearn believes this fight should not happen

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... fight.html

I'm no expert and correct me if I'm wrong but didn't Barry Hearn give John Higgins the chance to play snooker again after match fixing?

Was Higgins not found "not guilty"?

Higgins was not quilty of taking money but guilty of giving the impression that he would take money.

iamasadlittleboy wrote:

Bennyblanco wrote:

Final round wrote:Rival promoter Barry Hearn believes this fight should not happen

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... fight.html

I'm no expert and correct me if I'm wrong but didn't Barry Hearn give John Higgins the chance to play snooker again after match fixing?

Was Higgins not found "not guilty"?

Yes found not guilt after formal investigation by WPBSA head an ex met chief defective then independent tribunal. he was still fined and banned for 6 months.

Dan Dares wrote:

gobbles wrote:

IRLangmaid25 wrote:I am not surprised that this fight has been announced in all honesty but I am struggling to work up any enthasuism for it in all honesty because all I can see his Haye making an utter mess of Chisora before getting battered senseless by a determined Vitali K who wants to the finish the job that Wladimir started.

What fight has been announced?

If Haye fights Chisora in July, I'll eat hay with a donkey.

Looks like I'm eating Hay (with a Donkey).

Sonny Barch wrote:Remember when Jon Robinson set up the IBF - UK years ago? Boxing News refused to cover their shows (even though they carried reports of IBF 'World' title fights) I wonder what stance BN will take with this new federation?

That is a great question, Sonny.

dondada wrote:

Sonny Barch wrote:Remember when Jon Robinson set up the IBF - UK years ago? Boxing News refused to cover their shows (even though they carried reports of IBF 'World' title fights) I wonder what stance BN will take with this new federation?

That is a great question, Sonny.

It is a great question, looked like Boxing News really endorsed allegedly with their sponsorship of the Mayweather vs Cotto fight..... a load of advertising and sponsorship package with the TV channel might influence their stance on the fight.

MachoMan09 wrote:

dondada wrote:

Sonny Barch wrote:Remember when Jon Robinson set up the IBF - UK years ago? Boxing News refused to cover their shows (even though they carried reports of IBF 'World' title fights) I wonder what stance BN will take with this new federation?

That is a great question, Sonny.

Whatever their stance may be, I'm 100% sure they'll cover the fight.

Oh aye. However, I do think this move is incredibly significant for the future governance of our sport.

MachoMan09 wrote:

dondada wrote:

MachoMan09 wrote: Whatever their stance may be, I'm 100% sure they'll cover the fight.

Oh aye. However, I do think this move is incredibly significant for the future governance of our sport.

Me too. I can see upsides and downsides.

Yes, the big worry for me is fighters not being deemed fit, for whatever reason, to hold a licence - getting licenced to fight..... yes sure that happens now on the unlicenced circuit, but then they don't expect to fill football stadiums.

Could we, as an example, have the winner of this fight fighting Riddick Bowe (I'm making an assumption that Riddick wouldn't pass the BBBoC medicals based on his appearance on ringside).

Whilst it not be due to a physical medical issue, the BBBoC have deemed Derek Chisora as currently unfit to hold a boxing licence. We must have uniformity on who is and who is not fit to fight.

Great points, stu and that's just for starters...this is a real challenge to the BBBoC, make no mistake about it.

dondada wrote:

MachoMan09 wrote:

dondada wrote: That is a great question, Sonny.

Whatever their stance may be, I'm 100% sure they'll cover the fight.

Oh aye. However, I do think this move is incredibly significant for the future governance of our sport.

And I'm very interested to see how the totally impartial, 'tell it like it is' Steve Bunce tackles it...

The Dark Destroyer wrote:I'm genuinely shocked that Haye has taken this. What does it offer him? Financially or career wise?

Financially, the answer should be obvious. Career wise, it's a good match, even leaving aside the marketable grudge. A year's layoff from a damaging world title loss, he goes in with a respected fringe contender. That's fair enough. What other kind of fight would he have? Any lower down the rung could be a mismatch, and any higher would be undeserved.

How well is this fight going to sell? I'm not sure....

MachoMan09 wrote:

stujones wrote:We must have uniformity on who is and who is not fit to fight.

Why must we have uniformity? And who are "we" anyway? If 22 fat knackers with bad knees and no eyes decided to book Wembley for a football match and sell tickets for the privilege of being able to watch, what's the problem? The onus is on the potential customer to decide if they want to buy a ticket or not.

Not sure the analogy is exactly holds true cause of the more violent nature of the sport. If you have 22 fat knackers with bad knees - you can see exactly what the problem is and you can make judgments (the punter).

If you have a fighter with some damage retina, not that visible in press conferences etc, or you have a fighter who has had some neural damage.... and they end up blinded or worst.... how will the press react, what about insurance details and claims etc. What will that do for the nay sayers who want to ban the sport.

Spencer Oliver recently spoke and said words to the effect of "if by some miracle the BBBoC would licence me, I wouldn't hesistate but to comeback"..... Now, Spencer is aware that the BBBoC wouldn't and he is not actively seeking out a chance with them.... but now there are avenues available..... possibly not for Spencer himself, because his was such a high profile problem.... but what about Barry Jones before him, or Nigel Wright now.