Page 2 of 2

Re: Cockneygymrat

Posted: 24 May 2012, 18:41
by Horse
Deno1986 wrote:Don't fret, mate. Take it as a compliment. :TU:
I will then, thanks. :TU:

Re: Cockneygymrat

Posted: 24 May 2012, 18:44
by exittored
I like Cockneygymrat, he's ok in my books and you need your head examining making a thread about him.

Re: Cockneygymrat

Posted: 24 May 2012, 18:45
by Palimpsest
states wrote:
kevo wrote:
Horse wrote:I am not sure how to respond to that.
With a question?
Horse?
:lol:

Re: Cockneygymrat

Posted: 24 May 2012, 18:50
by JDC
From what I've seen, he's been a good poster. Not saying I agree with him, but he's put his points across in a reasonable manner (again from what I've seen). If he's replaced an old alias... so what?

If you don't agree with him, take him on.

Re: Cockneygymrat

Posted: 24 May 2012, 19:06
by Palimpsest
Horse wrote:
Palimpsest wrote:Image
You are new so I don't know much about you, are you a troll?
Judging by your posts in this thread you're hardly in a position to accuse anyone of being a 'troll'

Image

Re: Cockneygymrat

Posted: 24 May 2012, 19:08
by Horse
Palimpsest wrote:Judging by your posts in this thread you're hardly in a position to accuse anyone of being a 'troll'
Have a look at your posts in this thread, they are far more trollish than anyone else's.

Re: Cockneygymrat

Posted: 24 May 2012, 19:12
by Palimpsest
Horse wrote:
Palimpsest wrote:Judging by your posts in this thread you're hardly in a position to accuse anyone of being a 'troll'
Have a look at your posts in this thread, they are far more trollish than anyone else's.
This from 'Horse' who has gone out his way to be argumentative from the outset :lol:

Re: Cockneygymrat

Posted: 24 May 2012, 19:14
by Horse
Palimpsest wrote:This from 'Horse' who has gone out his way to be argumentative from the outset :lol:
I don't believe that is the case.

Re: Cockneygymrat

Posted: 24 May 2012, 19:15
by states
I disagree.

Re: Cockneygymrat

Posted: 24 May 2012, 19:18
by Palimpsest
Horse wrote:
Palimpsest wrote:This from 'Horse' who has gone out his way to be argumentative from the outset :lol:
I don't believe that is the case.
Good night 'Horse'

Re: Cockneygymrat

Posted: 24 May 2012, 19:19
by Horse
states wrote:I disagree.
Petty, petty, petty.

Re: Cockneygymrat

Posted: 24 May 2012, 19:19
by JDC
I like the way Horse does it, always have. Asks very blunt questions and gives nothing away. It's like here's a platform... go talk stupid :OhYes:

Re: Cockneygymrat

Posted: 24 May 2012, 19:20
by Horse
Palimpsest wrote:Good night 'Horse'
Grow up, Palimpsest, you time wasting troll.

Re: Cockneygymrat

Posted: 24 May 2012, 19:23
by Horse
JDC wrote:I like the way Horse does it, always have. Asks very blunt questions and gives nothing away. It's like here's a platform... go talk stupid :OhYes:
:TU:

Re: Cockneygymrat

Posted: 24 May 2012, 19:26
by Palimpsest
Horse wrote:
Palimpsest wrote:Good night 'Horse'
Grow up, Palimpsest, you time wasting troll.
I've been rebuked ....... by 'Horse' :oops:

Re: Cockneygymrat

Posted: 24 May 2012, 20:46
by Poncey
Horse wrote:
Palimpsest wrote:Judging by your posts in this thread you're hardly in a position to accuse anyone of being a 'troll'
Have a look at your posts in this thread, they are far more trollish than anyone else's.
But Looking at all threads, he isn't.

The poster in question is on my radar.

Bat signal was sent up yesterday.

Re: Cockneygymrat

Posted: 25 May 2012, 00:19
by Craig14
That was a funny 2 minutes reading the entire thread. It's like something out of faulty towers. :lol:

Re: Cockneygymrat

Posted: 25 May 2012, 01:09
by Deserter
Adamj1987 wrote:
Deserter wrote:
Horse wrote:My question was rhetorical. Didn't you understand that?
I did. It doesn't change my point.
ironic
:lol:

Re: Cockneygymrat

Posted: 25 May 2012, 01:11
by Deserter
kevo wrote:
Horse wrote:
Deno1986 wrote:Sometimes Horse reminds me of an online version of Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory. Respect, man! :bow:
I am not sure how to respond to that.
With a question?
:lol: :lol: :bow: :bow:

Re: Cockneygymrat

Posted: 25 May 2012, 03:50
by taffytoon
Horse wrote:Would you make this thread if you agreed with him?
Who says I do not agree with him? I think a lot of what he says makes sence, I would just like to know who he really is as in my opinion he is an established member. He has shown some very valid opinions to be honest.

Re: Cockneygymrat

Posted: 25 May 2012, 04:27
by Palimpsest
Poncey wrote:
Horse wrote:
Palimpsest wrote:Judging by your posts in this thread you're hardly in a position to accuse anyone of being a 'troll'
Have a look at your posts in this thread, they are far more trollish than anyone else's.
But Looking at all threads, he isn't.

The poster in question is on my radar.

Bat signal was sent up yesterday.
Oh dear :oo

Re: Cockneygymrat

Posted: 25 May 2012, 15:30
by Yes We Can
taffytoon wrote:
Horse wrote:Would you make this thread if you agreed with him?
Who says I do not agree with him? I think a lot of what he says makes sence, I would just like to know who he really is as in my opinion he is an established member. He has shown some very valid opinions to be honest.
Who cares either way?

Alias on internet forum shocker?!?!

Re: Cockneygymrat

Posted: 25 May 2012, 19:23
by taffytoon
funtime wrote:
taffytoon wrote:
Horse wrote:Would you make this thread if you agreed with him?
Who says I do not agree with him? I think a lot of what he says makes sence, I would just like to know who he really is as in my opinion he is an established member. He has shown some very valid opinions to be honest.
Who cares either way?

Alias on internet forum shocker?!?!
Suppose you're right funtime :bow: