Re: Cockneygymrat
Posted: 24 May 2012, 18:41
I will then, thanks.Deno1986 wrote:Don't fret, mate. Take it as a compliment.
I will then, thanks.Deno1986 wrote:Don't fret, mate. Take it as a compliment.
states wrote:Horse?kevo wrote:With a question?Horse wrote:I am not sure how to respond to that.
Judging by your posts in this thread you're hardly in a position to accuse anyone of being a 'troll'Horse wrote:You are new so I don't know much about you, are you a troll?Palimpsest wrote:

Have a look at your posts in this thread, they are far more trollish than anyone else's.Palimpsest wrote:Judging by your posts in this thread you're hardly in a position to accuse anyone of being a 'troll'
This from 'Horse' who has gone out his way to be argumentative from the outsetHorse wrote:Have a look at your posts in this thread, they are far more trollish than anyone else's.Palimpsest wrote:Judging by your posts in this thread you're hardly in a position to accuse anyone of being a 'troll'
I don't believe that is the case.Palimpsest wrote:This from 'Horse' who has gone out his way to be argumentative from the outset
Good night 'Horse'Horse wrote:I don't believe that is the case.Palimpsest wrote:This from 'Horse' who has gone out his way to be argumentative from the outset
Petty, petty, petty.states wrote:I disagree.
Grow up, Palimpsest, you time wasting troll.Palimpsest wrote:Good night 'Horse'
JDC wrote:I like the way Horse does it, always have. Asks very blunt questions and gives nothing away. It's like here's a platform... go talk stupid
I've been rebuked ....... by 'Horse'Horse wrote:Grow up, Palimpsest, you time wasting troll.Palimpsest wrote:Good night 'Horse'
But Looking at all threads, he isn't.Horse wrote:Have a look at your posts in this thread, they are far more trollish than anyone else's.Palimpsest wrote:Judging by your posts in this thread you're hardly in a position to accuse anyone of being a 'troll'
Adamj1987 wrote:ironicDeserter wrote:I did. It doesn't change my point.Horse wrote:My question was rhetorical. Didn't you understand that?
kevo wrote:With a question?Horse wrote:I am not sure how to respond to that.Deno1986 wrote:Sometimes Horse reminds me of an online version of Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory. Respect, man!
Who says I do not agree with him? I think a lot of what he says makes sence, I would just like to know who he really is as in my opinion he is an established member. He has shown some very valid opinions to be honest.Horse wrote:Would you make this thread if you agreed with him?
Oh dearPoncey wrote:But Looking at all threads, he isn't.Horse wrote:Have a look at your posts in this thread, they are far more trollish than anyone else's.Palimpsest wrote:Judging by your posts in this thread you're hardly in a position to accuse anyone of being a 'troll'
The poster in question is on my radar.
Bat signal was sent up yesterday.
Who cares either way?taffytoon wrote:Who says I do not agree with him? I think a lot of what he says makes sence, I would just like to know who he really is as in my opinion he is an established member. He has shown some very valid opinions to be honest.Horse wrote:Would you make this thread if you agreed with him?
Suppose you're right funtimefuntime wrote:Who cares either way?taffytoon wrote:Who says I do not agree with him? I think a lot of what he says makes sence, I would just like to know who he really is as in my opinion he is an established member. He has shown some very valid opinions to be honest.Horse wrote:Would you make this thread if you agreed with him?
Alias on internet forum shocker?!?!