Page 2 of 2
Re: Buglioni
Posted: 31 May 2012, 06:07
by Vano-irons
Bryn wrote:Vano-irons wrote:
I've also heard that BJS absolutely battered Mendy in sparring. Like, totally fucked him up
Interesting. When was this mate?
BJS is one of my favourite domestic fighters, I'm certain we will see him challenge and win an alphabet title in the next few years.
This was at the beginning of the month apparently (I wasn't there, but heard from someone at the TKO).
I really like Billy Joe as well. Massively exciting prospect with power and pretty good boxing skills. Warren needs to move him along a bit quicker tho
Re: Buglioni
Posted: 31 May 2012, 06:09
by Superheavy
Vano-irons wrote:He has pretty much blown everyone away at this level so far, so the Latvians and TTGs won't tell us too much.
TTGs

Re: Buglioni
Posted: 01 Jun 2012, 14:54
by DannyNaz
What did I say about noble??? No wonder they didn't put frank in with him!!!
Wish I could find somewhere to put a wager on these undercard fights! I knew noble could win this.
Re: Buglioni
Posted: 01 Jun 2012, 14:56
by smoggy7188
Dignum looks tiny.
Re: Buglioni
Posted: 01 Jun 2012, 15:10
by DannyNaz
Probably a day before weigh in as well smoggy!
Noble is a lot better than his record when in the mood though.
Re: Buglioni
Posted: 01 Jun 2012, 15:12
by smoggy7188
smith looks tiny too, i fancy ancliff here.
Re: Buglioni
Posted: 01 Jun 2012, 15:24
by smoggy7188
Ancliff really is slipping, needs to think bout packing in cos he takes a alot of shots. i remember seeing him in with joe murray and he was really good.
Re: Buglioni
Posted: 01 Jun 2012, 15:52
by DannyNaz
I really think he hasn't got the desire anymore and is there for a decent pay day.
Hasn't looked great in his last few.
Re: Buglioni
Posted: 01 Jun 2012, 17:28
by Old bones Ian
I'm a fan of Buglioni, but his footwork isn't good tonight. His feet are squarein up his body in there
Re: Buglioni
Posted: 01 Jun 2012, 17:44
by The Insider
Watching him now and he's far to easy to hit. Soon as he faces a live opponent or banger he could be in trouble. I agree with the commentators that he doesn't get his hands back quick enough.
Re: Buglioni
Posted: 01 Jun 2012, 17:45
by smoggy7188
If he didnt have all the fans there wudnt be such a fuss about him.
Re: Buglioni
Posted: 01 Jun 2012, 17:46
by Old bones Ian
He's doing ok tonight, but he needs a fight away from home IMO.
Re: Buglioni
Posted: 01 Jun 2012, 17:48
by smoggy7188
Agree with that but they will milk the fans as much as they can by keeping him in london.
Re: Buglioni
Posted: 01 Jun 2012, 17:51
by Old bones Ian
He looked bored in there tonight. I'm guessing he gets good sparring, but i think he needs to work on his footwork, get himself in and out better. He's not going to walk everyone down, and thats all he's doing at the moment with the quality of opponents. He needs to get in with champions sparring.
Re: Buglioni
Posted: 01 Jun 2012, 17:53
by smoggy7188
He looks vulnerable at the moment. i like buncey but i wish he would get off buglionis cock.
Re: Buglioni
Posted: 01 Jun 2012, 18:16
by The Insider
Not impressed on that performance. Hes a work in progress and its early days so he may yet prove me wrong.
Re: Buglioni
Posted: 01 Jun 2012, 18:20
by milpool
First time I've seen Buglioni, wasn't massively impressed. He shipped a lot of silly punches but to his credit he showed a lot of concentration and just got on with the job.
He's still learning but they need to bring him on slowly.
Re: Buglioni
Posted: 01 Jun 2012, 18:28
by markfightoptions
Again im totally unimpressed by this kid, i would definitely like to see his opponent fight again soon - hard as nails.
Re: Buglioni
Posted: 02 Jun 2012, 01:46
by iftkwoody
yid14 wrote:iftkwoody wrote:He looks pretty good think he'll have to be taken slow tho as he has a lot of faults.
When you out again Dan?
Probably september mate there is talks of a title fight. Masters I think
Re: Buglioni
Posted: 02 Jun 2012, 01:57
by iftkwoody
I fought meikle and dont underestimate him he is a very tough slippery fighter he is also an absolutely top bloke but thats for another thread. To be honest I think i didn't see anything from buglioni I wasn't expecting. He looks the part and has a good level of skill just got a young head on his shoulders I have been told that he is the "next bog thing" and i wish him all the best in being that but he has a lot to learn first. All the stuff about his crown being too much and putting him off shouldn't be a factor because that is a key part of Boxing if your good your not just a good boxer your good at handling pressure and loads of other things. I always say a good boxer doesn't always make a good boxer theres so much more than skill to be counted for.
Anyway frank looks like a decent from fighter and by his interviews a top bloke and I look forward to seeing him progress
Re: Buglioni
Posted: 02 Jun 2012, 02:14
by crusader
Buglioni was hit too much, especially during the first three rounds.
Re: Buglioni
Posted: 02 Jun 2012, 02:25
by crusader
BTW---Am I correct in thinking that the score was 60-55?
BoxRec lists it as 60-54
Re: Buglioni
Posted: 02 Jun 2012, 04:58
by safeerah
Greavesy wrote:This week Buglioni fights again
Only Jody Miekle
so shouldnt be much trouble
But how far can he go ?
First time i saw him i was impressed
but then when i saw him again i wasnt too impress at all .
I think he is a accident waiting to happen, no defense at all, upright with his head up like a beacon and loads up too much, shame really great support, unfortunately when he goes up in level he will be found out, if not before.
Re: Buglioni
Posted: 02 Jun 2012, 11:46
by palooka
It's too early to tell; he was a very good amateur without being the best at his weight. He has a good frame and looks strong. He'll need to be moved steady and can't imagine he'll face a hitter for a few years yet. He has a great following and I imagine he'll be in some decent scraps and earn a few quid.