Widest ever score after 12 rounds ?

Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Widest ever score after 12 rounds ?

Post by Datsue »

iamasadlittleboy wrote:120-104, 119-105 (twice)
The scores of the recent rematch between Ezequiel Osvaldo Maderna and Ruben Eduardo Acosta
Wow. Do they still use the old half-point thing down in Argie, or is that only for domestic-level clashes? 'Cos if that's half-point scoring, fvck me...

& at this point I'd like to add I'm in favour of more use being made of the 10 points. Seems silly to have ten points & only use three of them, max. Something like 10-8 for winning a round, 10-9 for scraping a round, with each knockdown being a point off (rather than today's automatic 10-8 thing). Might change the pace & flow of twelve round fights, but I've been going off that for a while now.
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Widest ever score after 12 rounds ?

Post by orbtastic »

Didn't one of the minor organisations use a 20 point must system for a while? I seem to recall that, back in the late 90s. If so, then one of them could technically be the biggest differences in scores perhaps?
LeedsLad
Cruiserweight
Posts: 996
Joined: 02 Jul 2010, 06:15

Re: Widest ever score after 12 rounds ?

Post by LeedsLad »

I don't automatically score a round 10-8 if there's a KD.

If fighter A is winning a round fairly clearly, and is decked with ten seconds left, should there really be a three point swing? It's just lazy scoring IMHO.

Also, if a guy is battering the opponent around the ring (round 8 of Hatton vs Floyd for instance) - that's surely more dominant than just winning a round fractionally but scoring a KD?

I score a few even rounds - rather than just guessing or trying to find something that's not really there.... 10-9 should be for close rounds, and 10-8 for clear ones.

If fighter A wins most of a round but is dropped, score it 10-9 against him. Fighter B should have to actually win the round clearly to get a 10-8 I feel.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11791
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Widest ever score after 12 rounds ?

Post by Old bones Ian »

orbtastic wrote:Didn't one of the minor organisations use a 20 point must system for a while? I seem to recall that, back in the late 90s. If so, then one of them could technically be the biggest differences in scores perhaps?
The WBU used it, but it was still scoring a round 20-20 or 20-19 etc. I couldn't see the differene from a 10 point system. Glen Johnson v Silvio Branco was scored
226-236 , 221-238, 222-237
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6148
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Re: Widest ever score after 12 rounds ?

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

-KOKid- wrote:Terry Norris W12 Sugar Ray Leonard.
Scored 119-103, 120-104 and 116-110 (absurdly generous).

I remember picking Leonard to win that one :KO:
ha ha yeah that's the fight i thought of. :OhYes:

that one judge 116-110. :o
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Widest ever score after 12 rounds ?

Post by orbtastic »

Old bones Ian wrote:
orbtastic wrote:Didn't one of the minor organisations use a 20 point must system for a while? I seem to recall that, back in the late 90s. If so, then one of them could technically be the biggest differences in scores perhaps?
The WBU used it, but it was still scoring a round 20-20 or 20-19 etc. I couldn't see the differene from a 10 point system. Glen Johnson v Silvio Branco was scored
226-236 , 221-238, 222-237
Glad I didn't imagine it.

I thought Jon's reasoning was that instead of a 10-9 you may score it 20-18 and instead of 10-8 you might score it 20-16 or 20-17 so after 12 rounds you have a greater potential points differential, even for close or evenly scored fights.

236-226, for example, is a 10 point difference (sorry for stating the obvious) - Which in "normal" terms could be scoring 11 rounds to one guy and 1 to the other i.e. 119-109 - More or less a whitewash and not remotely close on the scorecards...but 236-226 could indicate a fight where it's 8-4 in rounds (which is what most scored that bout) but rather than there be a 4 point deficit i.e. 116-112 , there's a wider deficit.

Don't even know if that makes sense or not. I'm pretty sure his reasoning was to stop close-ish fights being draws or controversially scored.

Pretty pointless though.
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Widest ever score after 12 rounds ?

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

OK this was only a 4 rounder but...was Gary Cornish v Tayar Mehmed really 40-30? O_o
Freiheit
Editor
Editor
Posts: 2851
Joined: 28 Dec 2001, 20:00

Re: Widest ever score after 12 rounds ?

Post by Freiheit »

Speaking of strange scores. Last saturday in Ghana that was scored: judge: Erasmus Dowuana Owoo 112-112 | judge: May Mensah Akakpo 110-112 | judge: Michael Neequaye 105-118
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Widest ever score after 12 rounds ?

Post by Datsue »

Brandon Rios vs Ricardo Dominguez

98-95 | 100-96 | 94-95

100-96? I'm all for drawn rounds, but FFS!
Bajingo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 14
Joined: 19 Nov 2010, 13:42

Re: Widest ever score after 12 rounds ?

Post by Bajingo »

Jeff Thomas wrote:On another note one judge scored johnny nelsons fight with allison rodriguez 120-119.... 11 rounds even one to Rodriguez
Must have been a classic.
Post Reply