Page 2 of 2

Re: Tyson Fury vs James Toney

Posted: 12 Aug 2012, 10:44
by jessi
loaded_gloves wrote:
jessi wrote:Toney been a shite hw anyway, proves nothing !
Only man outside of the giant Riddick Bowe to stop Holyfield, dropped and easily outpointed John Ruiz, easily beat Dominick Guinn, made Sam Peter look ridiculous after Peter dropped Klitschko three times, beat Hasim Rahman..... yeah, he's really been a 'shite' heavyweight hasn't he?
All over the hill mate, your never convince me James toney is a good heavy weight !

Re: Tyson Fury vs James Toney

Posted: 13 Aug 2012, 08:06
by loaded_gloves
All over the hill? Ruiz was champ. Peter had just come off decking Wlad three times and was yet to win the WBC belt. Holyfield, whilst undeniably old, went on to make easier work of Valuev than Haye.

I don't need to convince you, if you want to take a stance that makes you sound uninformed and borderline retarded you're welcome to do so, that's the beauty of Boxrec.

Re: Tyson Fury vs James Toney

Posted: 13 Aug 2012, 18:02
by HomicideHenry
loaded_gloves wrote:Bullshit. The BBBoC would not license this, surely.

Would love to see the casual sports fans trying to comprehend why the great Tyson Fury is fighting a 43 year old middleweight.

Toney could go the distance but the house ref will cook up a ridiculous 'stoppage' for Fury.
Unless it happens here in America, in and around Mississippi :TU:

Re: Tyson Fury vs James Toney

Posted: 15 Aug 2012, 05:39
by oliverfennell
brian13 wrote:
loaded_gloves wrote:Bullshit. The BBBoC would not license this, surely.
They wont because he is over 40 and doesn't hold a World title.
Neither does Delroy Spencer...