BoxRec

Posted: **22 Aug 2012, 10:09**

Burns is the best active British fighter.

But I like being contrary sometimes. And I love Froch as much as the next man, unless the next man is a Canadian by way of Romania.

Posted: **22 Aug 2012, 12:27**

BoxRob wrote:Billy Nelson, yes it is my first post on here as I said, I dont normally comment...Just observe. And that doesn't mean when I do make a comment that I'm talking 'shit'. I came on here to ask for opinions from a rumour I heard and wondered if it was true or a wise move?

In less than 14 hours since I asked my question you come on here and say that I have gone 'quiet'. No, I just don't live on my PC or on it 24/7, I have other things to get on with in my life. Anyway, you seem up tight about this fight...Which is understandable as you know, it is a tough fight.oh and I'm far from a fool.

@JoeLouis1234, I'm not trying to play any 'tricks'. Surely professionals wouldn't fool for such a thing anyway. Billy, just because Mr Louis has his opinion, doesn't mean he is 'right' or the 'cat is out the bag' ? Just think there is no smoked without fire....
I didin't realise you was so sensitive or infact that you viewed these pages. I will be a bit more careful next time so to not upset you.

I hate the phrase "no smoke without fire" because there physically CAN be smoke without fire, and no fornicating WAY would ricky leave billy, had to do a double take when I read the OP. I can start a rumour that john smith is a paedophile, does that mean theres "no smoke without fire" if people start repeating it?

Posted: **22 Aug 2012, 12:28**

BoxRob wrote:Billy Nelson, yes it is my first post on here as I said, I dont normally comment...Just observe. And that doesn't mean when I do make a comment that I'm talking 'shit'. I came on here to ask for opinions from a rumour I heard and wondered if it was true or a wise move?

In less than 14 hours since I asked my question you come on here and say that I have gone 'quiet'. No, I just don't live on my PC or on it 24/7, I have other things to get on with in my life. Anyway, you seem up tight about this fight...Which is understandable as you know, it is a tough fight.oh and I'm far from a fool.

@JoeLouis1234, I'm not trying to play any 'tricks'. Surely professionals wouldn't fool for such a thing anyway. Billy, just because Mr Louis has his opinion, doesn't mean he is 'right' or the 'cat is out the bag' ? Just think there is no smoked without fire....
I didin't realise you was so sensitive or infact that you viewed these pages. I will be a bit more careful next time so to not upset you.

I hate the phrase "no smoke without fire" because there physically CAN be smoke without fire, and no fornicating WAY would ricky leave billy, had to do a double take when I read the OP. I can start a rumour that john smith is a paedophile, does that mean theres "no smoke without fire" if people start repeating it?

Posted: **22 Aug 2012, 12:28**

BoxRob wrote:Billy Nelson, yes it is my first post on here as I said, I dont normally comment...Just observe. And that doesn't mean when I do make a comment that I'm talking 'shit'. I came on here to ask for opinions from a rumour I heard and wondered if it was true or a wise move?

In less than 14 hours since I asked my question you come on here and say that I have gone 'quiet'. No, I just don't live on my PC or on it 24/7, I have other things to get on with in my life. Anyway, you seem up tight about this fight...Which is understandable as you know, it is a tough fight.oh and I'm far from a fool.

@JoeLouis1234, I'm not trying to play any 'tricks'. Surely professionals wouldn't fool for such a thing anyway. Billy, just because Mr Louis has his opinion, doesn't mean he is 'right' or the 'cat is out the bag' ? Just think there is no smoked without fire....
I didin't realise you was so sensitive or infact that you viewed these pages. I will be a bit more careful next time so to not upset you.

Posted: **23 Aug 2012, 03:35**

jonp wrote:
BoxRob wrote:Billy Nelson, yes it is my first post on here as I said, I dont normally comment...Just observe. And that doesn't mean when I do make a comment that I'm talking 'shit'. I came on here to ask for opinions from a rumour I heard and wondered if it was true or a wise move?

In less than 14 hours since I asked my question you come on here and say that I have gone 'quiet'. No, I just don't live on my PC or on it 24/7, I have other things to get on with in my life. Anyway, you seem up tight about this fight...Which is understandable as you know, it is a tough fight.oh and I'm far from a fool.

@JoeLouis1234, I'm not trying to play any 'tricks'. Surely professionals wouldn't fool for such a thing anyway. Billy, just because Mr Louis has his opinion, doesn't mean he is 'right' or the 'cat is out the bag' ? Just think there is no smoked without fire....
I didin't realise you was so sensitive or infact that you viewed these pages. I will be a bit more careful next time so to not upset you.
You know when you said you dont normally comment just observe.You do know it shows that you joined two days ago? And to just observe the British forum you have to join so how long as this observing been going on?

To be fair, I have viewed the British forum without logging on. I know at a time you couldn't do that but I've always been able to view the other forums without being a member.

Posted: **23 Aug 2012, 04:24**

billy nelson wrote:
BoxRob wrote:Billy Nelson, yes it is my first post on here as I said, I dont normally comment...Just observe. And that doesn't mean when I do make a comment that I'm talking 'shit'. I came on here to ask for opinions from a rumour I heard and wondered if it was true or a wise move?

In less than 14 hours since I asked my question you come on here and say that I have gone 'quiet'. No, I just don't live on my PC or on it 24/7, I have other things to get on with in my life. Anyway, you seem up tight about this fight...Which is understandable as you know, it is a tough fight.oh and I'm far from a fool.

@JoeLouis1234, I'm not trying to play any 'tricks'. Surely professionals wouldn't fool for such a thing anyway. Billy, just because Mr Louis has his opinion, doesn't mean he is 'right' or the 'cat is out the bag' ? Just think there is no smoked without fire....
I didin't realise you was so sensitive or infact that you viewed these pages. I will be a bit more careful next time so to not upset you.
Listen mate the last thing I'm worried about is RUMOURS you have heard,rest assured I'm im in no way uptight about Ricky's fight with Kevin I'm 100 percent confident has I know I have the better all round fighter.Dagenham Boxrob

I didn't say you was or should be 'worried'. and I'm not from Dagenham by the way

Posted: **23 Aug 2012, 04:26**

billy nelson wrote:ps Ricky looked great in sparring today!

Thats brilliant

Posted: **23 Aug 2012, 04:31**

jonp wrote:
BoxRob wrote:Billy Nelson, yes it is my first post on here as I said, I dont normally comment...Just observe. And that doesn't mean when I do make a comment that I'm talking 'shit'. I came on here to ask for opinions from a rumour I heard and wondered if it was true or a wise move?

In less than 14 hours since I asked my question you come on here and say that I have gone 'quiet'. No, I just don't live on my PC or on it 24/7, I have other things to get on with in my life. Anyway, you seem up tight about this fight...Which is understandable as you know, it is a tough fight.oh and I'm far from a fool.

@JoeLouis1234, I'm not trying to play any 'tricks'. Surely professionals wouldn't fool for such a thing anyway. Billy, just because Mr Louis has his opinion, doesn't mean he is 'right' or the 'cat is out the bag' ? Just think there is no smoked without fire....
I didin't realise you was so sensitive or infact that you viewed these pages. I will be a bit more careful next time so to not upset you.
You know when you said you dont normally comment just observe.You do know it shows that you joined two days ago? And to just observe the British forum you have to join so how long as this observing been going on?

You can observe the British forum without joining, which I have been doing, not just the British.

, Why is everyone so defensive and challenging here? I simply enquired about a rumour I heard and just ask an opinion, why should I be attacked for that. Didn't know I had to run it past my brief before making a statement here.......

Posted: **23 Aug 2012, 04:35**

billy nelson wrote:
BoxRob wrote:Billy Nelson, yes it is my first post on here as I said, I dont normally comment...Just observe. And that doesn't mean when I do make a comment that I'm talking 'shit'. I came on here to ask for opinions from a rumour I heard and wondered if it was true or a wise move?

In less than 14 hours since I asked my question you come on here and say that I have gone 'quiet'. No, I just don't live on my PC or on it 24/7, I have other things to get on with in my life. Anyway, you seem up tight about this fight...Which is understandable as you know, it is a tough fight.oh and I'm far from a fool.

@JoeLouis1234, I'm not trying to play any 'tricks'. Surely professionals wouldn't fool for such a thing anyway. Billy, just because Mr Louis has his opinion, doesn't mean he is 'right' or the 'cat is out the bag' ? Just think there is no smoked without fire....
I didin't realise you was so sensitive or infact that you viewed these pages. I will be a bit more careful next time so to not upset you.
And do inform us all were you heard your rumour from

Your not worried about it I thought? No big source, just a few general people who I thought was in the know.Wow, didn't realise I'd be shot down for asking opinions on what I heard

Posted: **23 Aug 2012, 04:45**

GreenLightning wrote:
BoxRob wrote:Billy Nelson, yes it is my first post on here as I said, I dont normally comment...Just observe. And that doesn't mean when I do make a comment that I'm talking 'shit'. I came on here to ask for opinions from a rumour I heard and wondered if it was true or a wise move?

In less than 14 hours since I asked my question you come on here and say that I have gone 'quiet'. No, I just don't live on my PC or on it 24/7, I have other things to get on with in my life. Anyway, you seem up tight about this fight...Which is understandable as you know, it is a tough fight.oh and I'm far from a fool.

@JoeLouis1234, I'm not trying to play any 'tricks'. Surely professionals wouldn't fool for such a thing anyway. Billy, just because Mr Louis has his opinion, doesn't mean he is 'right' or the 'cat is out the bag' ? Just think there is no smoked without fire....
I didin't realise you was so sensitive or infact that you viewed these pages. I will be a bit more careful next time so to not upset you.

I hate the phrase "no smoke without fire" because there physically CAN be smoke without fire, and no effing WAY would ricky leave billy, had to do a double take when I read the OP. I can start a rumour that john smith is a paedophile, does that mean theres "no smoke without fire" if people start repeating it?

I prefer where there's no smoke there's no fire myself.

Posted: **23 Aug 2012, 04:46**

mfc_se15 wrote:
jonp wrote:
BoxRob wrote:Billy Nelson, yes it is my first post on here as I said, I dont normally comment...Just observe. And that doesn't mean when I do make a comment that I'm talking 'shit'. I came on here to ask for opinions from a rumour I heard and wondered if it was true or a wise move?

In less than 14 hours since I asked my question you come on here and say that I have gone 'quiet'. No, I just don't live on my PC or on it 24/7, I have other things to get on with in my life. Anyway, you seem up tight about this fight...Which is understandable as you know, it is a tough fight.oh and I'm far from a fool.

@JoeLouis1234, I'm not trying to play any 'tricks'. Surely professionals wouldn't fool for such a thing anyway. Billy, just because Mr Louis has his opinion, doesn't mean he is 'right' or the 'cat is out the bag' ? Just think there is no smoked without fire....
I didin't realise you was so sensitive or infact that you viewed these pages. I will be a bit more careful next time so to not upset you.
You know when you said you dont normally comment just observe.You do know it shows that you joined two days ago? And to just observe the British forum you have to join so how long as this observing been going on?

I didn't know that was the case but assuming it is that is class haha!!

Thats not the case though....

Posted: **23 Aug 2012, 04:48**

GreenLightning wrote:
BoxRob wrote:Billy Nelson, yes it is my first post on here as I said, I dont normally comment...Just observe. And that doesn't mean when I do make a comment that I'm talking 'shit'. I came on here to ask for opinions from a rumour I heard and wondered if it was true or a wise move?

In less than 14 hours since I asked my question you come on here and say that I have gone 'quiet'. No, I just don't live on my PC or on it 24/7, I have other things to get on with in my life. Anyway, you seem up tight about this fight...Which is understandable as you know, it is a tough fight.oh and I'm far from a fool.

@JoeLouis1234, I'm not trying to play any 'tricks'. Surely professionals wouldn't fool for such a thing anyway. Billy, just because Mr Louis has his opinion, doesn't mean he is 'right' or the 'cat is out the bag' ? Just think there is no smoked without fire....
I didin't realise you was so sensitive or infact that you viewed these pages. I will be a bit more careful next time so to not upset you.

I hate the phrase "no smoke without fire" because there physically CAN be smoke without fire, and no effing WAY would ricky leave billy, had to do a double take when I read the OP. I can start a rumour that john smith is a paedophile, does that mean theres "no smoke without fire" if people start repeating it?

Yes, good point. Thats not the right phrase...

Posted: **23 Aug 2012, 04:50**

jonp wrote:Joining date is just under yr user name.Also try using the british forum if your not logged in

Don't just observe British forum, and not just this site either. Also, have just been on this forum without logging in?

Posted: **23 Aug 2012, 05:57**

Thats the point until recently you couldnt even come on the british forum with out logging in .So if your saying you did when you only joined 3 days ago either it isnt true or you come on under another name.If you were under another name people only create new identities to cause trouble or talk BS usualy.

Posted: **23 Aug 2012, 08:52**

jonp wrote:Thats the point until recently you couldnt even come on the british forum with out logging in .So if your saying you did when you only joined 3 days ago either it isnt true or you come on under another name.If you were under another name people only create new identities to cause trouble or talk BS usualy.

Wait a minute, hold on here! Are you 'questioning me'? Your a wasted talent, they could do with your sort in the Police Force. You need to brush up just a little though. Re read my post, I said "I normally observe and not comment" ..I'm not just talking about this forum, the 'British Scene'. Meaning I observe the Currant Scene' the 'Training Scene', Other Topics' etc, reading other forums on other sites aswell. Cause trouble and BS talk??

Really? Didn't realise I was talking to School kids. What 'trouble' is there to be caused talking about boxing? Grow up mate, asked for a simple opinion. Wow a lot of you are a paranoid bunch aren't you

Posted: **23 Aug 2012, 08:52**

jonp wrote:Thats the point until recently you couldnt even come on the british forum with out logging in .So if your saying you did when you only joined 3 days ago either it isnt true or you come on under another name.If you were under another name people only create new identities to cause trouble or talk BS usualy.

Wait a minute, hold on here! Are you 'questioning me'? Your a wasted talent, they could do with your sort in the Police Force. You need to brush up just a little though. Re read my post, I said "I normally observe and not comment" ..I'm not just talking about this forum, the 'British Scene'. Meaning I observe the Currant Scene' the 'Training Scene', Other Topics' etc, reading other forums on other sites aswell. Cause trouble and BS talk??

Really? Didn't realise I was talking to School kids. What 'trouble' is there to be caused talking about boxing? Grow up mate, asked for a simple opinion. Wow a lot of you are a paranoid bunch aren't you

Posted: **23 Aug 2012, 09:53**

Cause trouble and BS talk?? Really? Didn't realise I was talking to School kids. What 'trouble' is there to be caused talking about boxing? Grow up mate, asked for a simple opinion. Wow a lot of you are a paranoid bunch aren't you

Anyone who has observed the forums would know that whenver you voice an opinion then you are there to be agreed or disagreed with, relax its not personal when people question you. Now is there any truth in the rumour that Ricky Burns is planning to switch trainers?

DD

Posted: **23 Aug 2012, 10:19**

Youve been qble to view without logging on for months and months, maybe 12. My ipad auto logs me out so very rare do i come into brit forum logged on. It was members only for couple years for the same reason everytime you write f-r-a-n-k-warr-e-n the word allegedly automaticaly came up, hence a lot of old posters refer to him as allegedly

Posted: **23 Aug 2012, 15:48**

coachster wrote:
Cause trouble and BS talk?? Really? Didn't realise I was talking to School kids. What 'trouble' is there to be caused talking about boxing? Grow up mate, asked for a simple opinion. Wow a lot of you are a paranoid bunch aren't you
Anyone who has observed the forums would know that whenver you voice an opinion then you are there to be agreed or disagreed with, relax its not personal when people question you. Now is there any truth in the rumour that Ricky Burns is planning to switch trainers? DD

To be honest I don't know, a few people talking in the gym and Burns v Mitchell came up. Couple of them was discussing about Burns leaving his trainer, which for the record I thought was a bad idea this close to a big fight. Also for the record I believe that Burns wins this clear on points and that it would be a bad move if Burns was to switch trainers. (Take note Billy Nelson, before you 'jump' all over me)

Posted: **23 Aug 2012, 17:59**

Come on then rob what gym were you in when you allegedly heard this rumour?

Posted: **24 Aug 2012, 09:45**

billy nelson wrote:Come on then rob what gym were you in when you allegedly heard this rumour?

Billy, a bit of advice. Don't show your worried or bothered by it. It's the least of your worries...remember ;;-)

I dont care if you don't believe me. And to be honest, I personally couldn't care less if true or not. Just had an opinion that if it was true it wouldn't be a wise move to change this near a fight. The more the fight gets nearer of course the less likely this 'rumour' is true. So Billy, as each day passes you can chill alittle bit more

.....Only if it does concern you that is

Posted: **24 Aug 2012, 10:42**

Ricky won't leave Billy unless Kevin beats him !
What trainers have you got in mind from the 23rd of september then Ricky ?
I've heard Jimmy Tibbs is good, along way down the road though !
Kevin Mitchell is the pride of Essex and East London ! Come on kev, show the jocks how to really fight !

Posted: **24 Aug 2012, 10:53**

jessi wrote:Ricky won't leave Billy unless Kevin beats him !
What trainers have you got in mind from the 23rd of september then Ricky ?
I've heard Jimmy Tibbs is good, along way down the road though !
Kevin Mitchell is the pride of Essex and East London ! Come on kev, show the jocks how to really fight !

Same way he fought against Katsidis hopefully

Posted: **24 Aug 2012, 11:02**

ShadrachSimmo wrote:
jessi wrote:Ricky won't leave Billy unless Kevin beats him !
What trainers have you got in mind from the 23rd of september then Ricky ?
I've heard Jimmy Tibbs is good, along way down the road though !
Kevin Mitchell is the pride of Essex and East London ! Come on kev, show the jocks how to really fight !
Same way he fought against Katsidis hopefully

Mitchell will slowly show everyone that the katsidis fight was nothing but a bad day at the office, burns will be knocked out in spectacular fashion to silence 10,000 jocks all at once !

Posted: **24 Aug 2012, 11:13**

jessi wrote:
ShadrachSimmo wrote:
jessi wrote:Ricky won't leave Billy unless Kevin beats him !
What trainers have you got in mind from the 23rd of september then Ricky ?
I've heard Jimmy Tibbs is good, along way down the road though !
Kevin Mitchell is the pride of Essex and East London ! Come on kev, show the jocks how to really fight !
Same way he fought against Katsidis hopefully
Mitchell will slowly show everyone that the katsidis fight was nothing but a bad day at the office, burns will be knocked out in spectacular fashion to silence 10,000 jocks all at once !

Aye because we are all still laughing after Katsidis wiped him out without breaking sweat.

BoxRec

Ricky Burns

Re: Ricky Burns

Re: Ricky Burns

Re: Ricky Burns

Re: Ricky Burns

Re: Ricky Burns

Re: Ricky Burns

Re: Ricky Burns

Re: Ricky Burns

Re: Ricky Burns

Re: Ricky Burns

Re: Ricky Burns

Re: Ricky Burns

Re: Ricky Burns

Re: Ricky Burns

Re: Ricky Burns

Re: Ricky Burns

Re: Ricky Burns

Re: Ricky Burns

Re: Ricky Burns

Re: Ricky Burns

Re: Ricky Burns

Re: Ricky Burns

Re: Ricky Burns

Re: Ricky Burns

Re: Ricky Burns