Re: Matchroom Monopoly on Sky
Posted: 11 Sep 2012, 16:47
I wrote a proper little response to that question until I saw what you did.dondada wrote:Brook v Saliva won't get people's mouths watering?
I wrote a proper little response to that question until I saw what you did.dondada wrote:Brook v Saliva won't get people's mouths watering?
Well spottedHorse wrote:I wrote a proper little response to that question until I saw what you did.dondada wrote:Brook v Saliva won't get people's mouths watering?
I thought Saturday was very much hit and miss.ashedward wrote:My thoughts is that it`s way to early to tell,for what it`s worth i thought last saturdays card was good 4 live fights at differant levals, Lee Purdy was trending at one point and eveyone in arena seemed to enjoy themselves.The Belfast card looks very good,quality fights is the main thing,i dont have a problem with imports if they are good fighters who give are lads a competatve fights,Belfast should be buzzing.
I think we can tell by Cleverly's reign how much credence being WBO mandatory holds. He has been champ for ages now and hasn't had a single mandatory that I can think of.The Dark Destroyer wrote:Well he was number one in the WBO's rankings for quite a while.jameswilson wrote:Saying Brook is having a 13th final eliminator is a bit strong. His last fight was an eliminator and this one is a final eliminator, there's nothing long and drawn out about the process he has gone through. It's hardly the second coming of Howard Eastman or Junior Witter's situations where they were sat as the WBC mandatory seemingly for years.