Mark thompson starting on allegedly now....

crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Mark thompson starting on Allegedly channel now....

Post by crusader »

mcato wrote:
manno wrote:Early stoppage, simple as that. MT might not have won that fight in the end but to be robbed of the opportunity to do so will leave a sour taste in his mouth for years to come. Nobody wants to see any1 hurt but at the end of the day if refs cant distinguish between a) heavy shots been thrown and landed and b)The effect (or non-effect in this case) a heavy looking landed shot has on a kid under pressure ie, the last uppercut then start umpiring cricket or sumat. Nobody wants to see fighters stretchered out of the ring but MT's eyes were clear and his legs were steady, these are kids careers FFS :witzend: I could half tolerate it if Thompson had been dug up from some Latvian cemetary and was lookikg for the floor b4 the 1st bell but the guy really came for the win :verysad:
How do ypu know he might not of won the fight? He was ahead.
Thompson was ahead? What's your source? Boxrec now lists the scores as 39-37 x2 for Culcay and 38-38. It's easy to see the rationale for having Thompson ahead, but the official cards support what manno seems to be implying; it would've been difficult for Thompson to win, even if he appeared to shade most rounds.
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: Mark thompson starting on Allegedly channel now....

Post by 15829 »

Wales wrote:
diggler wrote:If it happened the other way round and Thompson was the home fighter in England the fight would off been stopped
You think so? Im not 100% sure. The one thing i will say is many thought mark got lucky against horta, i was there that night and horta certainarly thought so as he stprmed out the ring shouting... Guess sometimes things even themselves out over the course of a career.

I would say mark has thrown himself right back in the british mix, even in defeat. Can he make 147 does anyone know?

I've seen stoppages just as bad, I doubt with the time out he could make 147 and if if he could it would probablt take to much out of him. I'd like to see him fight Jamie Cox for the commonwealth or Joe Selkirk in a British eliminator
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Mark thompson starting on Allegedly channel now....

Post by Wales »

crusader wrote:
mcato wrote:
manno wrote:Early stoppage, simple as that. MT might not have won that fight in the end but to be robbed of the opportunity to do so will leave a sour taste in his mouth for years to come. Nobody wants to see any1 hurt but at the end of the day if refs cant distinguish between a) heavy shots been thrown and landed and b)The effect (or non-effect in this case) a heavy looking landed shot has on a kid under pressure ie, the last uppercut then start umpiring cricket or sumat. Nobody wants to see fighters stretchered out of the ring but MT's eyes were clear and his legs were steady, these are kids careers FFS :witzend: I could half tolerate it if Thompson had been dug up from some Latvian cemetary and was lookikg for the floor b4 the 1st bell but the guy really came for the win :verysad:
How do ypu know he might not of won the fight? He was ahead.
Thompson was ahead? What's your source? Boxrec now lists the scores as 39-37 x2 for Culcay and 38-38. It's easy to see the rationale for having Thompson ahead, but the official cards support what manno seems to be implying; it would've been difficult for Thompson to win, even if he appeared to shade most rounds.
Yeah it is easy to see the rationale for having mark ahead, he was winning the rounds! Really surprised at 2 x 39-37 cards, oh, wait, no im not <Shakes fist in general direction of germany>.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Mark thompson starting on Allegedly channel now....

Post by crusader »

I think of the rationale for having Thompson ahead as the reasons why he should've won more rounds, not simply that 'he was winning the rounds.' A good argument would be that he scored relatively frequently from the outside, while successfully keeping Culcay at a distance which didn't suit him stylistically. This led to a parsimonious and low quality output from Culcay, as he struggled to get into a range from which his quicker, more compact punches were effective. Of the completed rounds, Culcay regularly found his ideal proximity and thereafter capitalized only during the third, which he won clearly. I, therefore, understand how people could've scored the bout 3-1 or 2-1-1 for Thompson, notwithstanding the divergence of those scores from the official scores.
BRENDAN1
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1
Joined: 01 Oct 2012, 05:47

Re: Mark thompson starting on Allegedly channel now....

Post by BRENDAN1 »

MARK THOMPSON WAS CLEARLY AHEAD, HE HADN'T BEEN HURT BY CULCAY AT ALL, I WAS THERE, THE GERMAN CROWD BOOD THE DECISION BY THE INADAQUATE PATHETIC REFEREE. ANOTHER EMBARRASING DECISION IN GERMANY AGAIN, AS I TOLD THE PROMOTER FRANK ON THE NIGHT, NO ONE WILL BE GOING TO GERMANY SOON TO FIGHT AND THAT IS A SHAME FOR SUCH A RESPECTFUL AUDIENCE AS THE GERMAN'S WERE. MARTIN MURRAY WAS ANOTHER CHEATED OVER THERE,CULCAY KNEW HE WAS VERY LUCKY AND THAT IS WHY HE SAID HE WON'T GIVE MARK A REMATCH.
Post Reply