Re: Ian John Lewis - Please just retire
Posted: 13 Nov 2012, 15:13
Tom Dallas v Zack Page
tear up wrote:
Ill fuckin knock you to the moon ya prick and yes your right one fight I did think he had done. Few of mine but I'm wrong
Oops sorry Mickey, that one was not meant for you.rhino222 wrote:tear up wrote:
Ill fuckin knock you to the moon ya prick and yes your right one fight I did think he had done. Few of mine but I'm wrong
and you can shut up....
Yep, a perfect example.Superheavy wrote:Tom Dallas v Zack Page
rhino222 wrote:Oops sorry Mickey, that one was not meant for you.rhino222 wrote:tear up wrote:
Ill fuckin knock you to the moon ya prick and yes your right one fight I did think he had done. Few of mine but I'm wrong
and you can shut up....
cheers bud, lots of man love from me....tear up wrote:
I jumped the gun rhino So amen to that mate
Apparently there is (or at least was) a contingency plan if a Prizefighter fighter is a draw - it goes an extra round.Deano s wrote:stujones wrote:I just wonder if the pressure is getting to him. He gets a lot of flak on the forums, no doubt he reads them.
He seems to have lost it, the post listing his bad calls as either a ref or a judge is now very long. He used to be an exceptional ref, the best in the business for me back 4/5 years ago. I remember when Craig Docherty was defending his Commonwealth Super Feather title and him allowing Craig to continue with an horrendous cut - that was the first time I had ever disagreed with any call he'd made.
I think he needs to take a break, not retire - he's young and was fantastic but I think there are too many eyes watching his performances now and he is finding the pressure tough.your right stu he was one of the best in the business iv seen him ref many a good fight and get the balance just right letting fights flow and breaking fighters up at the right times the prizefighter thing did him no favors but everyone must remember you can not score a prizefighter fight a draw and this puts pressure on the judges. the shannon briggs fight everyone was on his case, but to me there where no flurrys of punches that warranted a stoppage yes briggs took a beating but it was from a series of one two's and single big rights over 12 rounds no sustained attacks that a ref could jump in to. yes the enzo stoppage was shocking and im sure he knows he fu-ked that up but i bet he had in that back of his mind that enzo is shot and didn't want enzo to sustain any long lasting damage perhaps a break for him may be a good call stu
Who says that is the case?Deano s wrote:everyone must remember you can not score a prizefighter fight a draw and this puts pressure on the judges.
Jeff thomas record says different he had a draw in prizefighter and lost to the refs deciding vote but it went down as draw on his record.Horse wrote:Who says that is the case?Deano s wrote:everyone must remember you can not score a prizefighter fight a draw and this puts pressure on the judges.
Did the BBBofC declare that a Prizefighter fight could not be judged a draw?
When was it ever flipping announced that a Prizefighter judge could not score a Prizefighter fight a draw?
Hey Darcy i dont know if that used to b the rule but its not the same now only the promoter gets a list of whos working the show and apart from title fights the refs decide whos working which bout on the night.Darcy Delaney wrote:someone said before about why did they let IJL ref the fight,in title fights both fighters are sent a letter by the board telling them who the ref/judges are, if there was any problem then why didn't they (the boxers) contact the board to ask for someone different ?, i think IJL is all in all a good ref but maybe the board could look at not letting him ref any title fights and stick to 4/6 round fights just like some fighters are restricted to ?, (just to get his confidence back) ? people slagging him off is not the way to help him improve as a ref in what is such a difficult job to do ?
Never heard that for pros but ive seen it done a few times on unlicensed shows . maybe would be a good thing to adoptstujones wrote:Apparently there is (or at least was) a contingency plan if a Prizefighter fighter is a draw - it goes an extra round.Deano s wrote:stujones wrote:I just wonder if the pressure is getting to him. He gets a lot of flak on the forums, no doubt he reads them.
He seems to have lost it, the post listing his bad calls as either a ref or a judge is now very long. He used to be an exceptional ref, the best in the business for me back 4/5 years ago. I remember when Craig Docherty was defending his Commonwealth Super Feather title and him allowing Craig to continue with an horrendous cut - that was the first time I had ever disagreed with any call he'd made.
I think he needs to take a break, not retire - he's young and was fantastic but I think there are too many eyes watching his performances now and he is finding the pressure tough.your right stu he was one of the best in the business iv seen him ref many a good fight and get the balance just right letting fights flow and breaking fighters up at the right times the prizefighter thing did him no favors but everyone must remember you can not score a prizefighter fight a draw and this puts pressure on the judges. the shannon briggs fight everyone was on his case, but to me there where no flurrys of punches that warranted a stoppage yes briggs took a beating but it was from a series of one two's and single big rights over 12 rounds no sustained attacks that a ref could jump in to. yes the enzo stoppage was shocking and im sure he knows he fu-ked that up but i bet he had in that back of his mind that enzo is shot and didn't want enzo to sustain any long lasting damage perhaps a break for him may be a good call stu
I thought there was one stage in the Briggs fight (I think it was the end of the 7th round) in which Briggs was really rocked I think thats when it was getting beyond a joke that the fight continued. Even Briggs looked on like it HAD been stopped.
i'm only going off when my brothers boxed for a title they got a letter from the board and in it they said that if there was any problem with the ref ect ect then get in contact, but if you say the promoter gets a letter then he must of been happy with it alljonp wrote:Hey Darcy i dont know if that used to b the rule but its not the same now only the promoter gets a list of whos working the show and apart from title fights the refs decide whos working which bout on the night.Darcy Delaney wrote:someone said before about why did they let IJL ref the fight,in title fights both fighters are sent a letter by the board telling them who the ref/judges are, if there was any problem then why didn't they (the boxers) contact the board to ask for someone different ?, i think IJL is all in all a good ref but maybe the board could look at not letting him ref any title fights and stick to 4/6 round fights just like some fighters are restricted to ?, (just to get his confidence back) ? people slagging him off is not the way to help him improve as a ref in what is such a difficult job to do ?
I'm afraid it is this very modern, very British approach of 'Ooh let's not give someone too hard a time' that has let this man referee and judge incompetently for so long now. Something needs to be done, enough is enough I can't swallow one more fight-spoiling decision from this man!Ratchet Exits Nu wrote:lets give him a break, we all make mistakes.
Just wondering if you would like to elaborate? Clean early KO's are bad, but why would you say people don't come back from them, where's your science lad?hurlock wrote:Darcey the hardest job is that of the fighters!
IMO enzo shouldn't be licensed we have all seen him taken out bad style on numerous occasions.
There are people on here that don't realise that when a fighter suffers a certain ko there is no coming back as the damage is done!
Ricky v manny is one