BoxRec

crusader wrote:Your explanation was that your son should've won the bout because he won more rounds. I'm not concerned with such a broad explanation; I wanted to know why individual rounds unarguably should've been scored for him.

I didn't explain my opinion because it would induce a heart attack, rage, or some other calamity in you. You already claimed that I hate your son, which shows your petulant intolerance for commentary that doesn't praise him.

I love it when people think they know something and they don't, "your son" ha ha and listen dipstick winning more rounds usually means you have won a fight, well in my book it does, I don't see an explanation for your baseless opinion, but judging by the explanation of your opinion of the Maxwell fight, who cares, your a know it all, I also hate people who come on the forums armed with a dictionary, to seem intelligent, pathetic really.

Just another point if you land more punches too.

Peter Parker wrote:

crusader wrote:Your explanation was that your son should've won the bout because he won more rounds. I'm not concerned with such a broad explanation; I wanted to know why individual rounds unarguably should've been scored for him.

I didn't explain my opinion because it would induce a heart attack, rage, or some other calamity in you. You already claimed that I hate your son, which shows your petulant intolerance for commentary that doesn't praise him.

I love it when people think they know something and they don't, "your son" ha ha and listen dipstick winning more rounds usually means you have won a fight, well in my book it does, I don't see an explanation for your baseless opinion, but judging by the explanation of your opinion of the Maxwell fight, who cares, your a know it all, I also hate people who come on the forums armed with a dictionary, to seem intelligent, pathetic really.

So are you saying your not the poster formerly known as Safeerah ??

Deny all you like , Its obvious from your ramblings who you are , again , in one of your many guises

Looking On wrote:

Peter Parker wrote:

crusader wrote:Your explanation was that your son should've won the bout because he won more rounds. I'm not concerned with such a broad explanation; I wanted to know why individual rounds unarguably should've been scored for him.

I didn't explain my opinion because it would induce a heart attack, rage, or some other calamity in you. You already claimed that I hate your son, which shows your petulant intolerance for commentary that doesn't praise him.

I love it when people think they know something and they don't, "your son" ha ha and listen dipstick winning more rounds usually means you have won a fight, well in my book it does, I don't see an explanation for your baseless opinion, but judging by the explanation of your opinion of the Maxwell fight, who cares, your a know it all, I also hate people who come on the forums armed with a dictionary, to seem intelligent, pathetic really.

So are you saying your not the poster formerly known as Safeerah ??

Deny all you like , Its obvious from your ramblings who you are , again , in one of your many guises

Mong

Congleton wrote:

Peter Parker wrote:

sweetscience wrote:what was your old name on here Peter Parker ?

PIGG lol

PIGG as in PIGG Wilson, have you had that tw*t here as well?

He comes on ESB all the time just posting PIGG with a silly PIGG smiley, he's been banned numerous times but keeps coming back.

I thought it was an ESB disease, I'm dismayed to hear it's infected this place too

HATE THE PIGG!!

He PMs me regularly

Peter Parker wrote:

Looking On wrote:
So are you saying your not the poster formerly known as Safeerah ??

Deny all you like , Its obvious from your ramblings who you are , again , in one of your many guises

Mong

mmm thats 3 others calling you a troll

Congleton wrote:

danconnollyeire wrote: He PMs me regularly

You must be a friend of the PIGG?

mmm I just got a PM

Congleton wrote:PIGG

The peado is back

Why don't all the children start a new thread now you've ruined this one. Well done.

davidas wrote:Why don't all the children start a new thread now you've ruined this one. Well done.

Whatever PIG haha

sweetscience wrote:

davidas wrote:Why don't all the children start a new thread now you've ruined this one. Well done.

Whatever PIG haha

Give it a rest with this PIGG business Dan.