Re: Guerrero/Berto RBR.
Posted: 24 Nov 2012, 23:35
Damn Thurman looked impressive.
amazingly he is more well spoken than MayweatherBlodhemn wrote:'I change more numbers than a...a...hood guy with drugs in his basement' - Broner.
Blodhemn wrote:'I change more numbers than a...a...hood guy with drugs in his basement' - Broner.
x2eul wrote:Damn Thurman looked impressive.
Big part of why I like Thurman, articulate tough guys are few and far between nowadaysJAHamilton77 wrote:a hood guy with drugs in the basement?
let me see you cook cook?
way to set the black man back about 20 years
Blodhemn wrote:'I change more numbers than a...a...hood guy with drugs in his basement' - Broner.
Talent-wise he may have an argument, it's his resume that falls short but a lot of people place achievement lower than perceived ability in their lists, Roy is clearly one of them.JAHamilton77 wrote:Roy Jones says Broner is top 5 p4p
RJJ's been hit in the head too much if he thinks that.JAHamilton77 wrote:Roy Jones says Broner is top 5 p4p
Didn't catch that.JAHamilton77 wrote:Guerrero vs Ortiz is next according to Lampley
So did I. Still a legit opponent.[/quote]Rover wrote:Yes I am. Look in the current scene thread. Called it before the fight started.
Like most rappers or modern people in general? Wit seems more like a thing of the past. Cool that he said his performance against Ponce was due to style and didn't make excuses like most everyone else including HBO do.Diamond WEAPON wrote:Blodhemn wrote:'I change more numbers than a...a...hood guy with drugs in his basement' - Broner.![]()
Like I said before, his lines are running dry, Broner is like most modern rappers, just not that clever and very derivative. He should stick to being a pompous twat and getting his hair brushed, he's not as quick-witted as he'd like to believe and he's imitating Floyd's speech patterns and mannerisms more everyday
Everyone knows Thurman has power and everyone should know Quintana will more than likely fold when getting hit hard. The fight was worthless. I'm not slamming Thurman, I'm slamming HBO and Quintana.[/quote]Blodhemn wrote:So did I. Still a legit opponent.Rover wrote:Yes I am. Look in the current scene thread. Called it before the fight started.
I like both fighters, though neither is in my top 10 favorites.SouthpawStephen wrote:I've been slamming Guerrero lately. Hopefully I will not be eating crow tonight.
Damn right.SouthpawStephen wrote:You dare question Might Max????Rover wrote:When was Camacho/Mancini the second-most wanted fight in boxing behind Leonard/Hagler?
Hagler/Hearns, Max.
(Mancini lost his belt to Bramble in June 84 and the rematch 8 months later before Hags and Hearns had fought.)
That's ok, I slammed it for you.Rover wrote:He'd just stopped Latimore. Thurman also was moving up. I expected the result, but I won't slam the fight as not a legit one.Blodhemn wrote: Everyone knows Thurman has power and everyone should know Quintana will more than likely fold when getting hit hard. The fight was worthless. I'm not slamming Thurman, I'm slamming HBO and Quintana.
No, you slammed it for you.Blodhemn wrote:That's ok, I slammed it for you.Rover wrote:He'd just stopped Latimore. Thurman also was moving up. I expected the result, but I won't slam the fight as not a legit one.Blodhemn wrote: Everyone knows Thurman has power and everyone should know Quintana will more than likely fold when getting hit hard. The fight was worthless. I'm not slamming Thurman, I'm slamming HBO and Quintana.