Re: Who was the chinniest ATG?
Posted: 08 Dec 2012, 08:34
Hearns for an ATG did not have a good chin. Surprised none mentioned him; he is usually one of the first names to pop up on this topic.
His chin wasn't bad; only stopped once below middle by SRL in the 14th.Ambling Alp II wrote:Hearns for an ATG did not have a good chin. Surprised none mentioned him; he is usually one of the first names to pop up on this topic.
Yes, he counts, but he only was stopped once--at middle by an ATG middle.Syntax Error wrote:Does Felix Trinidad count as an ATG?
If so, I'm nominating him.
Exactly. Like Hamed.theone wrote:Trinidad had bad balance, keeping his feet too close together as he came straight in. Except against Hopkins, he'd bounced back up from flash knockdowns none the worse for wear. He did not have a bad chin.
It was a pleasant surprise, he wasn't chinny.Ambling Alp II wrote:Hearns for an ATG did not have a good chin. Surprised none mentioned him; he is usually one of the first names to pop up on this topic.
As a fellow Hearns fan, were you concerned about Hearn's chin while you watched him against Roldan and Kinchen.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:It was a pleasant surprise, he wasn't chinny.Ambling Alp II wrote:Hearns for an ATG did not have a good chin. Surprised none mentioned him; he is usually one of the first names to pop up on this topic.
Sure, he was certainly vulnerable, that's a far cry from being chinny. Though I wasn't worried heading into either of those fights. Kinchen may have won.keithmoonhangover wrote:As a fellow Hearns fan, were you concerned about Hearn's chin while you watched him against Roldan and Kinchen.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:It was a pleasant surprise, he wasn't chinny.Ambling Alp II wrote:Hearns for an ATG did not have a good chin. Surprised none mentioned him; he is usually one of the first names to pop up on this topic.
Duane Bobickkeithmoonhangover wrote:Saad, what's your definition of chinny?
I'm just asking for your own definition of the word.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Duane Bobickkeithmoonhangover wrote:Saad, what's your definition of chinny?
Whatever your definition is how can it include someone who fought top guys over 6 divisions spanning two decades without ever taking a ten count. While Tommy's heart was immense and that helped him forge through tough times, chinny is just a step too far.
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Duane Bobickkeithmoonhangover wrote:Saad, what's your definition of chinny?
Whatever your definition is how can it include someone who fought top guys over 6 divisions spanning two decades without ever taking a ten count. While Tommy's heart was immense and that helped him forge through tough times, chinny is just a step too far.
That won't stop Saad. ;;-)dempseyfire wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Duane Bobickkeithmoonhangover wrote:Saad, what's your definition of chinny?
Whatever your definition is how can it include someone who fought top guys over 6 divisions spanning two decades without ever taking a ten count. While Tommy's heart was immense and that helped him forge through tough times, chinny is just a step too far.
The majority of knockouts are not 10 counts, so not having taken a 10 count really doesn't mean much (as if a fighter should get extra credit b/c the ref steps in before a 10 count has to be administered . . vs Hagler he was more "out of it" than many a fighter I've seen take 10 count KO losses).
Hearns had great heart, recuperative powers, and skills which enabled him to survive many a shaky moment. But the guy definitely had a weak chin for an ATG. To argue otherwise is kind of silly.
I would think that a chinny fighter is doomed to lose when they get hurt. be it immediately or eventually, they can't recover from being in a bad way.keithmoonhangover wrote:I'm just asking for your own definition of the word.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Duane Bobickkeithmoonhangover wrote:Saad, what's your definition of chinny?
Whatever your definition is how can it include someone who fought top guys over 6 divisions spanning two decades without ever taking a ten count. While Tommy's heart was immense and that helped him forge through tough times, chinny is just a step too far.
I never said his chin wasn't weak compared to the company he keeps. It obviously was. There aren't any all time greats I would call chinny. If the question was of the 50 or so greatest fighters in history who had the weakest chin, Tommy would probably be the answer. Perhaps that's what he wanted and I just took too much exception to the wording. For the record, I don't think Patterson was chinny either.dempseyfire wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Duane Bobickkeithmoonhangover wrote:Saad, what's your definition of chinny?
Whatever your definition is how can it include someone who fought top guys over 6 divisions spanning two decades without ever taking a ten count. While Tommy's heart was immense and that helped him forge through tough times, chinny is just a step too far.
The majority of knockouts are not 10 counts, so not having taken a 10 count really doesn't mean much (as if a fighter should get extra credit b/c the ref steps in before a 10 count has to be administered . . vs Hagler he was more "out of it" than many a fighter I've seen take 10 count KO losses).
Hearns had great heart, recuperative powers, and skills which enabled him to survive many a shaky moment. But the guy definitely had a weak chin for an ATG. To argue otherwise is kind of silly.
keithmoonhangover wrote:dempseyfire wrote:That won't stop Saad. ;;-)SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
The majority of knockouts are not 10 counts, so not having taken a 10 count really doesn't mean much (as if a fighter should get extra credit b/c the ref steps in before a 10 count has to be administered . . vs Hagler he was more "out of it" than many a fighter I've seen take 10 count KO losses).
Hearns had great heart, recuperative powers, and skills which enabled him to survive many a shaky moment. But the guy definitely had a weak chin for an ATG. To argue otherwise is kind of silly.
If you didn't spend all your time sleeping, you could write your book.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
If you didn't make boring posts like that, I wouldn't get so woozy. I've never had much interest in writing a book, so sleep doesn't hurt that in the slightest. It's frankly weird that you keep bringing it up.keithmoonhangover wrote:If you didn't spend all your time sleeping, you could write your book.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
I better start bringing it up more then.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:If you didn't make boring posts like that, I wouldn't get so woozy. I've never had much interest in writing a book, so sleep doesn't hurt that in the slightest. It's frankly weird that you keep bringing it up.keithmoonhangover wrote:If you didn't spend all your time sleeping, you could write your book.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Those fights were at MW and SMW; I consider Hearns at his best at WW and JMW.keithmoonhangover wrote:As a fellow Hearns fan, were you concerned about Hearn's chin while you watched him against Roldan and Kinchen.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:It was a pleasant surprise, he wasn't chinny.Ambling Alp II wrote:Hearns for an ATG did not have a good chin. Surprised none mentioned him; he is usually one of the first names to pop up on this topic.
Tis true but he was also rarely touched in his prime and when he finally does, a string of pretty vicious knockouts ensues.Rover wrote:Don't know if you can glean he had a bad chin in his prime. He was a champ for over a decade before he was first stopped.Jpreisser wrote:I am merely tossing this out here because I am not sure if it warrants any merit but what do we make of Roy Jones Junior`s chin? Clearly it wasn`t tested in the early stages of his career but later on we have become accustomed to him getting starched.
I agree. Much has been made about his jump to heavyweight and I mostly agree with the assessments made. I also agree that Roy Jones Jr. would have beaten both Tarver and Johnson but did they expose the fact that he was chinny. I mean after all, had Jones Jr. retired after the Ruiz fight what would have been on our conclusion of his chin?Controversial wrote:I don't think his jump up to heavyweight and then back down to light heavyweight done him a lot of favours. That coupled with him getting on in years and losing his edge. He was 35 when he fight got stopped and he has continued to fight when he should have jacked it in. A younger and fresher Jones wouldn't have got KO'd by Tarver or Johnson.Jpreisser wrote:I am merely tossing this out here because I am not sure if it warrants any merit but what do we make of Roy Jones Junior`s chin? Clearly it wasn`t tested in the early stages of his career but later on we have become accustomed to him getting starched.