Page 2 of 2
Posted: 23 Mar 2004, 12:17
by jamesmcdonnell
Strange eh, I don't see how he can be rated so high there are others below him who have beaten far better opposition, unless it only counts European opponents....still would seem odd.
Posted: 23 Mar 2004, 12:19
by knockout
007 wrote:Thanks. Where can I find those??
http://www.boxebu.com/eburatings1pag.pdf
Posted: 23 Mar 2004, 12:21
by stujones
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Strange eh, I don't see how he can be rated so high there are others below him who have beaten far better opposition, unless it only counts European opponents....still would seem odd.
I don't think it does - I'm sure thats the same points he's got on the World scene. I'm afraid the Boxrec system for all its valiant effort is somewhat flawed. I mean check out their number 1 world heavyweight (or their number 1 light welter).
Posted: 23 Mar 2004, 12:23
by knockout
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Strange eh, I don't see how he can be rated so high there are others below him who have beaten far better opposition, unless it only counts European opponents....still would seem odd.
James i was going to do a post this morning on the subject.
Audley rated at 19 higher than Rahman, Maskaev, Bewster, Etienne, Mercer, Samil Sam.
Vladimir ranked a lot higher than Sanders who ko'd him.
thats why computerised rankings dont work very well