Page 2 of 2

Re: Best at Welter since Leonard-Hearns

Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 03:38
by Ezzard
I wrote out a list of guys who I thought would have a chance of making the top 10. I then looked at who they beat...and, to a lesser extent, who they lost narrowly to...only counting guys who moved up in weight if I had them on the list. Again, I wanted to see what difference that made.

Re: Best at Welter since Leonard-Hearns

Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 03:49
by Rover
SaadOffTheDeck wrote: Whitaker would box circles around Cuevas.
Yep. Palomino, too. But elmer considers Palomino and Cuevas "exceptional."

Re: Best at Welter since Leonard-Hearns

Posted: 15 Feb 2013, 03:50
by SaadOffTheDeck
Palomino would have been a good fight.