Page 2 of 2

Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard

Posted: 24 Mar 2013, 08:39
by handsofstone
If the Robert Stieglitz/George Groves fight did get made and Stieglitz came at Groves like he did with Arthur Abraham last night and Groves came out like he did at the start of the Glen Johnson fight then that would be some tear up :box:

Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard

Posted: 24 Mar 2013, 08:40
by Lenny
loaded_gloves wrote:Hold on, the WBO force mandatories now?

Where did that come from?

Joe Calzaghe had two mandatories in 10 years - both times against the undeserving Mario Weit.

Amazes me that anyone considers the WBO a major belt.
I think it's more to the fact the other organisations have come down to their level, or below where the WBA is concerned

Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard

Posted: 24 Mar 2013, 08:41
by handsofstone
Lenny wrote:
loaded_gloves wrote:Hold on, the WBO force mandatories now?

Where did that come from?

Joe Calzaghe had two mandatories in 10 years - both times against the undeserving Mario Weit.

Amazes me that anyone considers the WBO a major belt.
I think it's more to the fact the other organisations have come down to their level, or below where the WBA is concerned
x2 well put mate

Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard

Posted: 24 Mar 2013, 11:09
by btahthezone
I think the corner did the right thing pulling him out he was clearly affected with the eye and could t see much coming.

I think Groves v Stieglitz is the right fight and I think Groves wins. He is number one contender of I'm right in saying. Groves with a good fight in April leading up to the fight in the summer hopefully. Groves moves more than AA and has a better array of shots to push out. He comfortably wins over the distance.

Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard

Posted: 24 Mar 2013, 13:09
by Deno1986
sharpei_louis wrote:
Deno1986 wrote:

I kind of agree. Even though AA didn't look interested and wasn't doing anything (which is how he normally starts), I doubt Stieglitz could have kept up that pace for the whole fight.
Less than a third of the fight was enough though wasn't it!
Yes obviously but I was offering my opinion as to what I thought might have happened if AA's eye didn't close. Hypothetical stuff and all that jazz!

Re: Abraham v Stieglitz and undercard

Posted: 24 Mar 2013, 13:12
by Jack B
handsofstone wrote:
Lenny wrote:
loaded_gloves wrote:Hold on, the WBO force mandatories now?

Where did that come from?

Joe Calzaghe had two mandatories in 10 years - both times against the undeserving Mario Weit.

Amazes me that anyone considers the WBO a major belt.
I think it's more to the fact the other organisations have come down to their level, or below where the WBA is concerned
x2 well put mate
This wasn't a WBO enforced mandatory anyway (Groves is No.1). Was a rematch clause in the contract from the first fight.