Page 2 of 2

Re: Best Middleweight in Britain

Posted: 02 May 2013, 17:39
by davie
JayMc wrote:
I know it's been said a million times but it would be great to have a domestic super 6 for this current crop of middleweights

Murray, Macklin, Barker, Lee, Saunders, Ryder.

Never gonna happen though :witzend:
as entertaining as the fight would be for us. do we really want our 6 best domestic talents locked in a competition that means none of them will have any chance whatsoever of winning a world title for the next 2-3 years.

If even one of barker/macklin/murray had picked up a title in the last couple years i'd be all for it but a super six is just not going to happen when you have 3 30 year olds who are able to consistantly pick up world title shots

Re: Best Middleweight in Britain

Posted: 02 May 2013, 17:40
by lefty
Counter-puncher wrote:see the McEwan fight lefty, for a more tecnhically-adept boxer in McEwan eventually getting outmanned (basically in my opinion because Lee was a half stone or whatever bigger), skillswise McEwan had Lee ovr a barrel in that one
Lee is very technical himself though to be fair.

Re: Best Middleweight in Britain

Posted: 06 May 2013, 20:36
by boxingfarmer30
hurlock wrote:I made Murray after the styrm fight are best
Then
Barker
Macklin
Saunders
Ryder
Agreed.