Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

fasteddie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 812
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 21:40

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Post by fasteddie »

another 120-109 score card to floyd,easy money if you ask me,if mathew hatton can go the distance with canelo then what will floyd do? there isnt a boxer/fighter at 140,147 or 154 who can beat floyd at this moment,he is the best of the last 8-10 years
jessi
Cruiserweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Post by jessi »

Dead Mouse wrote:
stujones wrote:Just cannot believe it, Floyd fights Alvarez and is still getting criticisms. What I am saying I cannot believe it, of course I can. Floyd could fight King Kong and there would still be some criticisms.
To be fair, this is a blatant way of ducking the injured Sergio Martinez.
Martinez is finished mate :wave:
Yes We Can
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2087
Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Post by Yes We Can »

the catchweight doesn't really bother me.

If Saul Alvarez is stupid enough to give away 2lb in size advantage then fair play to Floyd for enforcing it.

On the flip side is Alvarez confident enough that he doesn't mind shedding the extra 2lb? he is going to be monstrously larger than Mayweather come fight night and its feasable to see him winning on natural strength and bully tactics alone.
Wrists
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1281
Joined: 09 May 2005, 12:13

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Post by Wrists »

If anyone criticises Mayweather in any way shape or form for this fight then they nothing about Boxing.
milpool
Cruiserweight
Posts: 5402
Joined: 18 May 2011, 13:38

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Post by milpool »

Can't wait for this, it's the fight I've been wanting. Part of me thinks that the old master will put on a boxing masterclass and put the young pup well and truly in his place but the other part of me thinks that this could be an upset...
In saying that, I guess Canelo would have to knock out Floyd to win?
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Post by DMA1987 »

Dead Mouse wrote:
jessi wrote:
Dead Mouse wrote:
To be fair, this is a blatant way of ducking the injured Sergio Martinez.
Martinez is finished mate :wave:
It is still another blatant duck by Floyd. Fighting the fully fit Canelo is not the same as dragging Martinez out of his sick bed and forcing him to fight at a catchweight of, say, 135lbs. This fight, which looks competitive on paper, is a horrible cynical example of boxing at it's worse. The clause in the contract stipulating that Canelo has to fight outdoors and without being able to apply suntan lotion is a scandal that shames us all.
I hope he gets it this time ;;-)

Although sunburn is no joke.
fasteddie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 812
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 21:40

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Post by fasteddie »

Dead Mouse wrote:
stujones wrote:Just cannot believe it, Floyd fights Alvarez and is still getting criticisms. What I am saying I cannot believe it, of course I can. Floyd could fight King Kong and there would still be some criticisms.
To be fair, this is a blatant way of ducking the injured Sergio Martinez.
hmm blatant duck of the INJURED martinez haha,if he is injured and the fight was made you would say then that he is only fighting him cause he is injured and so on and so on...... floyd is the best out there and he cant fight everyone who calls his name out or fight everyone that the people say fight. he is fighting the best of the best so good on him,make his money give a few boxing lessons out then retire its only what the smart fighters would do. next your gonna say why doesnt he fight ward.
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Post by danconnollyeire »

Who was it that once said "I look at Miguel Cotto as an undefeated fighter because he faced Pacquiao, but Pacquiao caught him at a catch weight. He wasn't the best Miguel Cotto. He was drained. He wasn't hydrated"
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Post by Final round »

Haha i remember that too who was it Dan? ;-)
fasteddie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 812
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 21:40

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Post by fasteddie »

Dead Mouse wrote:...sorry, I meant to write 'no Shane' as he ducked Mosley also until Shane was coming off a loss to Margarito. Sure, Mosley won, and by stoppage, but I felt he lost the fight, so it was a loss.
haha
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Post by danconnollyeire »

Dead Mouse wrote:
danconnollyeire wrote:Who was it that once said "I look at Miguel Cotto as an undefeated fighter because he faced Pacquiao, but Pacquiao caught him at a catch weight. He wasn't the best Miguel Cotto. He was drained. He wasn't hydrated"
Wow, a boxer makes a contradictory statement. What a scoop. Have you contacted the New York Times? The rehydration limit, or lack of, in this fight works on Canelo's favour.
danconnollyeire wrote:This screams 'Floyd is scared of Alvarez so is making him weight drained' (I'm not saying he is but that's how it looks).
How it did it look when Alvarez did it to Matthew Hatton? Do you think he was petrified of his opponent?
It looked nothing, because Floyd is Floyd and people will find a reason to hate on him
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Post by Final round »

danconnollyeire wrote:Who was it that once said "I look at Miguel Cotto as an undefeated fighter because he faced Pacquiao, but Pacquiao caught him at a catch weight. He wasn't the best Miguel Cotto. He was drained. He wasn't hydrated"
"We choose Miguel Cotto because he's solid," Mayweather told Kellerman. "We want tough competition; he's one of the best fighters out there. I look at Miguel Cotto as an undefeated fighter because he faced Pacquiao, but Pacquiao caught him at a catch weight. He wasn't the best Miguel Cotto. He was drained. He wasn't hydrated.

That's 2lb's for you in the eyes of Floyd Mayweather
CheckHook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 780
Joined: 10 Oct 2008, 06:45

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Post by CheckHook »

No fan of catch weights, especially when both guys hold a world title at 154, but no big deal, we get the fight and Canelo is young enough that his body should handle the extra 2lb cut without any adverse effects..... Gotta be honest, I hope the kid still rehydrates to his max/ comfortable weight come fight time, he needs all the help he can get. He is gonna have to be busier than he was against Trout. The longer he spends looking for openings the more he is going to eat the lead right hand, he needs to take chances, rely on his size and youth and hope to outwork Mayweather with his combination punching. Don't see anything but a 117-111 type of win for Mayweather, but still a fight that could have its moments if Canelo is willing to gamble.
jessi
Cruiserweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Post by jessi »

We can harp on and on about Floyd getting things in his favor but it's canelo and golden boy signing the contract, if it was that bad they would not sign !
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Post by Final round »

CheckHook wrote:No fan of catch weights, especially when both guys hold a world title at 154, but no big deal, we get the fight and Canelo is young enough that his body should handle the extra 2lb cut without any adverse effects..... Gotta be honest, I hope the kid still rehydrates to his max/ comfortable weight come fight time, he needs all the help he can get. He is gonna have to be busier than he was against Trout. The longer he spends looking for openings the more he is going to eat the lead right hand, he needs to take chances, rely on his size and youth and hope to outwork Mayweather with his combination punching. Don't see anything but a 117-111 type of win for Mayweather, but still a fight that could have its moments if Canelo is willing to gamble.
Yeah good call he can't wait for openings against Floyd
Quixall
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Post by Quixall »

Similar to the Guerrero fight.......................

As Bernard Hopkins said of the Mayweather - Guerrero fight :

" It's like Guerrero is a good plumber, he's a really good plumber and he's coming to my house. Only problem is that i need my lights fixed, i don't need a guy with plumbing skills, i need light skills "

In other words, Canello doesn't have the tools whatsoever to deal with Floyd. He will be picked apart all night long.
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Post by Tomasino »

Dead Mouse wrote:
jessi wrote:
Dead Mouse wrote:]Just cannot believe it, Floyd fights Alvarez and is still getting criticisms. What I am saying I cannot believe it, of course I can. Floyd could fight King Kong and there would still be some criticisms.
To be fair, this is a blatant way of ducking the injured Sergio Martinez.
Martinez is finished mate :wave:
It is still another blatant duck by Floyd. Fighting the fully fit Canelo is not the same as dragging Martinez out of his sick bed and forcing him to fight at a catchweight of, say, 135lbs. This fight, which looks competitive on paper, is a horrible cynical example of boxing at it's worse. The clause in the contract stipulating that Canelo has to fight outdoors and without being able to apply suntan lotion is a scandal that shames us all.[/quote]


I don't think boxrec should even record the fight details in the database.
ALI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 14:10

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Post by ALI »

I take my hat off to Mayweather, i thought he was going to avoid Alvarez like the plague.

Great fight!
Trojans44
Cruiserweight
Posts: 352
Joined: 23 Sep 2010, 14:05

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Post by Trojans44 »

Anyone else agree with me that for a guy at the absolute peak of the business Mayweather is remarkably reasonable regarding weight. He fought Oscar and Cotto at lmw and has agreed to this fight above 147. It needs to be bore in mind that he calls the tune and could easily say 147 or nothing. Of course the Marquez debacle detracts from this argument somewhat!
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Post by palooka »

This is a very good bout, a good match of styles and whoever isn't happy or won't enjoy watching I can't see them being a boxing fan. If you think it's a bad match and you won't watch then why comment? I dare say this will be an exciting bout Alverez is very good and will pressure strongly. Floyd is a welter, boxing the best the next weight up is ok with me.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Post by Final round »

palooka wrote:This is a very good bout, a good match of styles and whoever isn't happy or won't enjoy watching I can't see them being a boxing fan. If you think it's a bad match and you won't watch then why comment? I dare say this will be an exciting bout Alverez is very good and will pressure strongly. Floyd is a welter, boxing the best the next weight up is ok with me.
Who doesn't want to watch this?
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Post by SNG »

Trojans44 wrote:Anyone else agree with me that for a guy at the absolute peak of the business Mayweather is remarkably reasonable regarding weight. He fought Oscar and Cotto at lmw and has agreed to this fight above 147. It needs to be bore in mind that he calls the tune and could easily say 147 or nothing. Of course the Marquez debacle detracts from this argument somewhat!
I agree, although I suppose you could argue that DLH and Cotto were small at the weight and more natural WWs, and Canelo is more of a natural LMW. It's a really great fight, one of if not the best that can currently be made.
Pug1
Super Middleweight
Posts: 85
Joined: 27 May 2013, 11:50

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Post by Pug1 »

danconnollyeire wrote: It would be like when Hopkins won the LHW vs Pacal, then forcing Dawson to make 170lbs because he's scared of him or Calzaghe making Jones or Hopkins drain down. I don't understand Floyd's reasoning...
Boxing is mental and physical. Floyd is not scared of Canelo.

The weight issue was apparently the carrot from Canelo to get the fight. Floyd did not mention the weight and he has allowed Canelo to step in the ring at whatever weight he wants on the night.

Fight night weights?*

Floyd 147
Canelo 170

23lbs!!

*estimated.
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7853
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Post by Wales »

surprised by some of the negativity surrounding, for me, floyds toughest challenge.


Epic fight, cant wait. Cant afford to go either, whihc is a pain in the arse.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Post by palooka »

Wales wrote:surprised by some of the negativity surrounding, for me, floyds toughest challenge.


Epic fight, cant wait. Cant afford to go either, whihc is a pain in the arse.
I can't afford to go either but someone I know who can says it's no fun with all the crowds; he could go ringside but would rather watch on telly.
Post Reply