Page 2 of 5

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Posted: 30 May 2013, 07:54
by fasteddie
another 120-109 score card to floyd,easy money if you ask me,if mathew hatton can go the distance with canelo then what will floyd do? there isnt a boxer/fighter at 140,147 or 154 who can beat floyd at this moment,he is the best of the last 8-10 years

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Posted: 30 May 2013, 07:57
by jessi
Dead Mouse wrote:
stujones wrote:Just cannot believe it, Floyd fights Alvarez and is still getting criticisms. What I am saying I cannot believe it, of course I can. Floyd could fight King Kong and there would still be some criticisms.
To be fair, this is a blatant way of ducking the injured Sergio Martinez.
Martinez is finished mate :wave:

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Posted: 30 May 2013, 08:10
by Yes We Can
the catchweight doesn't really bother me.

If Saul Alvarez is stupid enough to give away 2lb in size advantage then fair play to Floyd for enforcing it.

On the flip side is Alvarez confident enough that he doesn't mind shedding the extra 2lb? he is going to be monstrously larger than Mayweather come fight night and its feasable to see him winning on natural strength and bully tactics alone.

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Posted: 30 May 2013, 08:18
by Wrists
If anyone criticises Mayweather in any way shape or form for this fight then they nothing about Boxing.

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Posted: 30 May 2013, 08:26
by milpool
Can't wait for this, it's the fight I've been wanting. Part of me thinks that the old master will put on a boxing masterclass and put the young pup well and truly in his place but the other part of me thinks that this could be an upset...
In saying that, I guess Canelo would have to knock out Floyd to win?

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Posted: 30 May 2013, 08:33
by DMA1987
Dead Mouse wrote:
jessi wrote:
Dead Mouse wrote:
To be fair, this is a blatant way of ducking the injured Sergio Martinez.
Martinez is finished mate :wave:
It is still another blatant duck by Floyd. Fighting the fully fit Canelo is not the same as dragging Martinez out of his sick bed and forcing him to fight at a catchweight of, say, 135lbs. This fight, which looks competitive on paper, is a horrible cynical example of boxing at it's worse. The clause in the contract stipulating that Canelo has to fight outdoors and without being able to apply suntan lotion is a scandal that shames us all.
I hope he gets it this time ;;-)

Although sunburn is no joke.

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Posted: 30 May 2013, 08:46
by fasteddie
Dead Mouse wrote:
stujones wrote:Just cannot believe it, Floyd fights Alvarez and is still getting criticisms. What I am saying I cannot believe it, of course I can. Floyd could fight King Kong and there would still be some criticisms.
To be fair, this is a blatant way of ducking the injured Sergio Martinez.
hmm blatant duck of the INJURED martinez haha,if he is injured and the fight was made you would say then that he is only fighting him cause he is injured and so on and so on...... floyd is the best out there and he cant fight everyone who calls his name out or fight everyone that the people say fight. he is fighting the best of the best so good on him,make his money give a few boxing lessons out then retire its only what the smart fighters would do. next your gonna say why doesnt he fight ward.

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Posted: 30 May 2013, 09:30
by danconnollyeire
Who was it that once said "I look at Miguel Cotto as an undefeated fighter because he faced Pacquiao, but Pacquiao caught him at a catch weight. He wasn't the best Miguel Cotto. He was drained. He wasn't hydrated"

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Posted: 30 May 2013, 09:31
by Final round
Haha i remember that too who was it Dan? ;-)

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Posted: 30 May 2013, 09:53
by fasteddie
Dead Mouse wrote:...sorry, I meant to write 'no Shane' as he ducked Mosley also until Shane was coming off a loss to Margarito. Sure, Mosley won, and by stoppage, but I felt he lost the fight, so it was a loss.
haha

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Posted: 30 May 2013, 10:55
by danconnollyeire
Dead Mouse wrote:
danconnollyeire wrote:Who was it that once said "I look at Miguel Cotto as an undefeated fighter because he faced Pacquiao, but Pacquiao caught him at a catch weight. He wasn't the best Miguel Cotto. He was drained. He wasn't hydrated"
Wow, a boxer makes a contradictory statement. What a scoop. Have you contacted the New York Times? The rehydration limit, or lack of, in this fight works on Canelo's favour.
danconnollyeire wrote:This screams 'Floyd is scared of Alvarez so is making him weight drained' (I'm not saying he is but that's how it looks).
How it did it look when Alvarez did it to Matthew Hatton? Do you think he was petrified of his opponent?
It looked nothing, because Floyd is Floyd and people will find a reason to hate on him

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Posted: 30 May 2013, 11:37
by Final round
danconnollyeire wrote:Who was it that once said "I look at Miguel Cotto as an undefeated fighter because he faced Pacquiao, but Pacquiao caught him at a catch weight. He wasn't the best Miguel Cotto. He was drained. He wasn't hydrated"
"We choose Miguel Cotto because he's solid," Mayweather told Kellerman. "We want tough competition; he's one of the best fighters out there. I look at Miguel Cotto as an undefeated fighter because he faced Pacquiao, but Pacquiao caught him at a catch weight. He wasn't the best Miguel Cotto. He was drained. He wasn't hydrated.

That's 2lb's for you in the eyes of Floyd Mayweather

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Posted: 30 May 2013, 11:49
by CheckHook
No fan of catch weights, especially when both guys hold a world title at 154, but no big deal, we get the fight and Canelo is young enough that his body should handle the extra 2lb cut without any adverse effects..... Gotta be honest, I hope the kid still rehydrates to his max/ comfortable weight come fight time, he needs all the help he can get. He is gonna have to be busier than he was against Trout. The longer he spends looking for openings the more he is going to eat the lead right hand, he needs to take chances, rely on his size and youth and hope to outwork Mayweather with his combination punching. Don't see anything but a 117-111 type of win for Mayweather, but still a fight that could have its moments if Canelo is willing to gamble.

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Posted: 30 May 2013, 11:50
by jessi
We can harp on and on about Floyd getting things in his favor but it's canelo and golden boy signing the contract, if it was that bad they would not sign !

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Posted: 30 May 2013, 11:59
by Final round
CheckHook wrote:No fan of catch weights, especially when both guys hold a world title at 154, but no big deal, we get the fight and Canelo is young enough that his body should handle the extra 2lb cut without any adverse effects..... Gotta be honest, I hope the kid still rehydrates to his max/ comfortable weight come fight time, he needs all the help he can get. He is gonna have to be busier than he was against Trout. The longer he spends looking for openings the more he is going to eat the lead right hand, he needs to take chances, rely on his size and youth and hope to outwork Mayweather with his combination punching. Don't see anything but a 117-111 type of win for Mayweather, but still a fight that could have its moments if Canelo is willing to gamble.
Yeah good call he can't wait for openings against Floyd

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Posted: 30 May 2013, 13:20
by Quixall
Similar to the Guerrero fight.......................

As Bernard Hopkins said of the Mayweather - Guerrero fight :

" It's like Guerrero is a good plumber, he's a really good plumber and he's coming to my house. Only problem is that i need my lights fixed, i don't need a guy with plumbing skills, i need light skills "

In other words, Canello doesn't have the tools whatsoever to deal with Floyd. He will be picked apart all night long.

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Posted: 30 May 2013, 14:04
by Tomasino
Dead Mouse wrote:
jessi wrote:
Dead Mouse wrote:]Just cannot believe it, Floyd fights Alvarez and is still getting criticisms. What I am saying I cannot believe it, of course I can. Floyd could fight King Kong and there would still be some criticisms.
To be fair, this is a blatant way of ducking the injured Sergio Martinez.
Martinez is finished mate :wave:
It is still another blatant duck by Floyd. Fighting the fully fit Canelo is not the same as dragging Martinez out of his sick bed and forcing him to fight at a catchweight of, say, 135lbs. This fight, which looks competitive on paper, is a horrible cynical example of boxing at it's worse. The clause in the contract stipulating that Canelo has to fight outdoors and without being able to apply suntan lotion is a scandal that shames us all.[/quote]


I don't think boxrec should even record the fight details in the database.

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Posted: 30 May 2013, 14:04
by ALI
I take my hat off to Mayweather, i thought he was going to avoid Alvarez like the plague.

Great fight!

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Posted: 30 May 2013, 14:17
by Trojans44
Anyone else agree with me that for a guy at the absolute peak of the business Mayweather is remarkably reasonable regarding weight. He fought Oscar and Cotto at lmw and has agreed to this fight above 147. It needs to be bore in mind that he calls the tune and could easily say 147 or nothing. Of course the Marquez debacle detracts from this argument somewhat!

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Posted: 30 May 2013, 15:11
by palooka
This is a very good bout, a good match of styles and whoever isn't happy or won't enjoy watching I can't see them being a boxing fan. If you think it's a bad match and you won't watch then why comment? I dare say this will be an exciting bout Alverez is very good and will pressure strongly. Floyd is a welter, boxing the best the next weight up is ok with me.

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Posted: 30 May 2013, 15:29
by Final round
palooka wrote:This is a very good bout, a good match of styles and whoever isn't happy or won't enjoy watching I can't see them being a boxing fan. If you think it's a bad match and you won't watch then why comment? I dare say this will be an exciting bout Alverez is very good and will pressure strongly. Floyd is a welter, boxing the best the next weight up is ok with me.
Who doesn't want to watch this?

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Posted: 30 May 2013, 16:51
by SNG
Trojans44 wrote:Anyone else agree with me that for a guy at the absolute peak of the business Mayweather is remarkably reasonable regarding weight. He fought Oscar and Cotto at lmw and has agreed to this fight above 147. It needs to be bore in mind that he calls the tune and could easily say 147 or nothing. Of course the Marquez debacle detracts from this argument somewhat!
I agree, although I suppose you could argue that DLH and Cotto were small at the weight and more natural WWs, and Canelo is more of a natural LMW. It's a really great fight, one of if not the best that can currently be made.

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Posted: 31 May 2013, 02:22
by Pug1
danconnollyeire wrote: It would be like when Hopkins won the LHW vs Pacal, then forcing Dawson to make 170lbs because he's scared of him or Calzaghe making Jones or Hopkins drain down. I don't understand Floyd's reasoning...
Boxing is mental and physical. Floyd is not scared of Canelo.

The weight issue was apparently the carrot from Canelo to get the fight. Floyd did not mention the weight and he has allowed Canelo to step in the ring at whatever weight he wants on the night.

Fight night weights?*

Floyd 147
Canelo 170

23lbs!!

*estimated.

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Posted: 31 May 2013, 07:44
by Wales
surprised by some of the negativity surrounding, for me, floyds toughest challenge.


Epic fight, cant wait. Cant afford to go either, whihc is a pain in the arse.

Re: Floyd v Alvarez - sept 14th - Confirmed

Posted: 31 May 2013, 12:18
by palooka
Wales wrote:surprised by some of the negativity surrounding, for me, floyds toughest challenge.


Epic fight, cant wait. Cant afford to go either, whihc is a pain in the arse.
I can't afford to go either but someone I know who can says it's no fun with all the crowds; he could go ringside but would rather watch on telly.