allegedly teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

JamesH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1897
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 09:16

Re: Allegedly channel teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

Post by JamesH »

bripez wrote:
expe wrote:I'd pay £20 a month for Allegedly channel with what they're offering now, especially with HD.
Easy Tiger ....

McGuigan has got one boxer - and either way he won't be fighting Quigg who has moved to Matchroom.

Hatton has got Murray.

Maloney has got Price

We are not talking about dozens of competitive fights about to happen any time soon.
Have to agree. And for the individual fighters mentioned, I suspect many who would subscribe for them, will already have subscribed to the channel.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Allegedly channel teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

Post by palooka »

bripez wrote:
expe wrote:I'd pay £20 a month for Allegedly channel with what they're offering now, especially with HD.
Easy Tiger ....

McGuigan has got one boxer - and either way he won't be fighting Quigg who has moved to Matchroom.

Hatton has got Murray.

Maloney has got Price

We are not talking about dozens of competitive fights about to happen any time soon.
But at least there is an element of cooperation between the different outfits; it can't have been easy, there are some egos there and if they didn't get it together then it's the boxers and fans who suffer.
rossij8
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1746
Joined: 16 Jul 2012, 08:06

Re: Allegedly channel teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

Post by rossij8 »

expe wrote:I'd pay £20 a month for Allegedly channel with what they're offering now, especially with HD.
Keep that quiet mate lol ;;-)
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Allegedly channel teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

Post by Finn »

DMA1987 wrote:
Finn wrote:Its great news and they've confirmed the PBF V Canelo fight too can't say im missing sky sports. I think FW is starting to win the war!
Spectacularly premature.


I don't think Allegedly channel is break-even yet.
Im talking in respect of fighters signed to the channel.
greenyox3
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1197
Joined: 20 Jul 2010, 16:53

Re: Allegedly channel teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

Post by greenyox3 »

FWP just blocked me on Twitter. The ingrate.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Allegedly channel teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

Post by whiskey »

Gary Buckland vs John Simpson announced today on the Clev show, which Hatton Promotions won.

But Simpson is not fighting Buckland, he is apparently confirmed as fighting on a Matchroom show in Glasgow on Sept 7th.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Allegedly channel teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

Post by DMA1987 »

Finn wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:
Finn wrote:Its great news and they've confirmed the PBF V Canelo fight too can't say im missing sky sports. I think FW is starting to win the war!
Spectacularly premature.


I don't think Allegedly channel is break-even yet.
Im talking in respect of fighters signed to the channel.
Matchroom have the best stable of fighters. He isn't winning any wars in that regard.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Allegedly channel teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

Post by DMA1987 »

G0mez wrote:Gary Buckland vs John Simpson announced today on the Clev show, which Hatton Promotions won.

But Simpson is not fighting Buckland, he is apparently confirmed as fighting on a Matchroom show in Glasgow on Sept 7th.
He has probably been emailing the wrong John Simpson. Can't wait to see who turns up.
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Allegedly channel teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

Post by Hagler2002 »

DMA1987 wrote:Matchroom have the best stable of fighters.
And they still manage to put shite cards on about every 6 weeks!
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Allegedly channel teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

Post by DMA1987 »

Hagler2002 wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:Matchroom have the best stable of fighters.
And they still manage to put shite cards on about every 6 weeks!
I know. They announce cards and actually put them on. Its not the allegedly way I am aware.
Preemo
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1
Joined: 26 Jun 2013, 04:35

Re: Allegedly channel teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

Post by Preemo »

I think this is good news today for Boxing fans.

Hopefully this new set up can bring more decent Boxing to our screens.
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: Allegedly channel teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

Post by earsjohn »

bripez wrote:
expe wrote:I'd pay £20 a month for Allegedly channel with what they're offering now, especially with HD.
Easy Tiger ....

McGuigan has got one boxer - and either way he won't be fighting Quigg who has moved to Matchroom.

Hatton has got Murray.

Maloney has got Price

We are not talking about dozens of competitive fights about to happen any time soon.
Not to mention that Carl Frampton was previously confirmed in a 4 fight deal with BN, starting 20/7; Martin Murrays last fight was broadcast on BN and he is not likely to fight again for another 4 months at least; and David Prices last fight was on BN and his next fight was already confirmed on BN.

So what does this new "tie up" change?

And yet another suggestion that HD is in the pipeline for sometime later this year.

The only "news" announced is the broadcast of Floyd v Canelo. Yay.
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Allegedly channel teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

Post by Parson Cross »

Hatton Promotions does not only consist of Martin Murray.
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Allegedly channel teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

Post by rhino222 »

they need to get on the btvision network, and ill climb onboard the good ship w@rren!!
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23187
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Allegedly channel teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

Post by mickey1975 »

earsjohn wrote:
bripez wrote:
expe wrote:I'd pay £20 a month for Allegedly channel with what they're offering now, especially with HD.
Easy Tiger ....

McGuigan has got one boxer - and either way he won't be fighting Quigg who has moved to Matchroom.

Hatton has got Murray.

Maloney has got Price

We are not talking about dozens of competitive fights about to happen any time soon.
Not to mention that Carl Frampton was previously confirmed in a 4 fight deal with BN, starting 20/7; Martin Murrays last fight was broadcast on BN and he is not likely to fight again for another 4 months at least; and David Prices last fight was on BN and his next fight was already confirmed on BN.

So what does this new "tie up" change?

And yet another suggestion that HD is in the pipeline for sometime later this year.

The only "news" announced is the broadcast of Floyd v Canelo. Yay.
So you have even put a negative spin on the news they have got the fight of the year?
Manchester Hitman
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1263
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 15:56

Re: Allegedly channel teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

Post by Manchester Hitman »

Its good news and I'm assuming now all of them including Frank will be adding to there stables now that they have the security of tv dates. McGuigan said at the Frampton signing presser that he will be signing irish prospects so hopefully he follows through with that - well he will have to if the next 3 Frampton fights after the July show are going to be in Belfast as he said.

What will really be interesting would be if Frank/Ricky/Maloney AKA the boxing Avengers team up (unofficially I guess as I think its against the rules?) on purse bids for british title fights etc - Hearn could really be under pressure here to manouvere his kids into title shots especially as the Frankster usually outbids him already as he did for BJS-Ryder but fo whatever reason couldnt keep the cards together - the added promotional muscle should do the trick.... :OhYes:

I reckon Hearn will have to bring Coldwell closer into the fold and maybe build an allienance of some sort with fat Mick as there working together on Haye-Fury - maybe that would open up Degale-Groves and Quigg-Galahad down the line...

Yep, I think the promotional shananigans will really benefit the fans :TU:
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: Allegedly channel teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

Post by earsjohn »

mickey1975 wrote: So you have even put a negative spin on the news they have got the fight of the year?
Not sure I was being negative, was attempting to demonstrate faux surprise.

Any negativity was aimed at the cynical timing of an announcement that says nothing of interest at a time when boxing schedules are traditionally bare and the channel operates a pay as you go subscription policy.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Allegedly channel teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

Post by lefty »

The only thing id say on this is I wonder what all the people who were saying Hatton wouldnt work with FW are saying now.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Allegedly channel teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

Post by DMA1987 »

earsjohn wrote:
mickey1975 wrote: So you have even put a negative spin on the news they have got the fight of the year?
Not sure I was being negative, was attempting to demonstrate faux surprise.

Any negativity was aimed at the cynical timing of an announcement that says nothing of interest at a time when boxing schedules are traditionally bare and the channel operates a pay as you go subscription policy.
Its an interesting thought. One I hadn't thought myself, but makes some sense.

It is going to improve his domestic cards more than anything. Like you mentioned he already buys the rights to the said promoters main fights anyway, but now these promoters will also get to show their entire stable I would think.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Allegedly channel teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

Post by DMA1987 »

columbo wrote:The only thing id say on this is I wonder what all the people who were saying Hatton wouldnt work with FW are saying now.
Was that or die for Hatton wasn't it. Losing Quigg probably gave him nightmares about losing Murray.

More surprised by the quotes from him today.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Allegedly channel teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

Post by Finn »

DMA1987 wrote:
Finn wrote: Im talking in respect of fighters signed to the channel.
Matchroom have the best stable of fighters. He isn't winning any wars in that regard.
Froch and Haye are big names which lift the Matchroom roster; even then both are PPV and you have to pay ontop of sky sports to watch them, you can subscribe to BN and still buy sky PPV anyway. If you compare names signed to BN against Matchroom; BN has an overall stronger, longer list. Plus BN has all the GBP fights.

Also lets not forget groves is only on a short term contract with Matchroom.

Which channel is better for boxing BN or Sky Sports?
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Allegedly channel teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

Post by TheCobra »

This is great news for domestic boxing in the UK, hopefully Hatton and Maloney can start to rebuild a little after the shattering affect that losing their Sky TV deals has had on their stables. The Hearn monopoly on Sky has made the majority of Sky's shows deadly dull to me, barring the Froch shows.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Allegedly channel teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

Post by expe »

TheCobra wrote:This is great news for domestic boxing in the UK, hopefully Hatton and Maloney can start to rebuild a little after the shattering affect that losing their Sky TV deals has had on their stables. The Hearn monopoly on Sky has made the majority of Sky's shows deadly dull to me, barring the Froch shows.
I think the Froch shows have been dull as well, over the 2 shows the only good fight was Froch-Kessler II.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Allegedly channel teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

Post by DMA1987 »

Finn wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:
Finn wrote: Im talking in respect of fighters signed to the channel.
Matchroom have the best stable of fighters. He isn't winning any wars in that regard.
Froch and Haye are big names which lift the Matchroom roster; even then both are PPV and you have to pay ontop of sky sports to watch them, you can subscribe to BN and still buy sky PPV anyway. If you compare names signed to BN against Matchroom; BN has an overall stronger, longer list. Plus BN has all the GBP fights.

Also lets not forget groves is only on a short term contract with Matchroom.

Which channel is better for boxing BN or Sky Sports?
Barker, Burns, Brook, Haye, Groves, Quigg, Froch

Plus the likes of Rees, Selby, Mitchell, etc.

It stacks up very favourably against BN. Interesting about GBP, be interesting to see if match room make the most of the fight swaps they have going with GBP.

As for the boxing channel, allegedly is better. But then again that has very little to do with Franks stable more the fights he buys. It is also a boxing only channel, would be suprising if it wasn't better than a general sports channel.

I am just wondering where he is starting to win any war? He had a good day yesterday. Let's not get too excitable.

I really do want to hear your version of why he has a stronger stable, in looking forwards to it. I don't buy its stronger at all.
Last edited by DMA1987 on 27 Jun 2013, 03:32, edited 1 time in total.
BillyTKid
Cruiserweight
Posts: 401
Joined: 08 Sep 2010, 13:19

Re: Allegedly channel teaming up with Maloney and Hatton.

Post by BillyTKid »

allegedly is great value. They average one big show a month from the US which you would have to pay $50+ for if you lived over there. On top of this you get plenty of action from Germany and the UK. Boxing fans have never had it so good with allegedly, Sky, Channel 5 and ESPN showing pretty much everything with a title.
Post Reply