BoxRec

8)

OK....if Homeside is agreeable it's unification time.

Geto...my suggestion is stop with your courageous and forthwrite ways, I suggest you duck folks like spinks and langford and wait for either Charles, Spinks or Gibbons to call your number in the next two weeks. Then of course you probably want to invite langford or moore to the party.


Let's just hope we don't have any drama queens who feel the need to drop belts along the way. How I despise that sort of operator.

You'd never catch GBP acting so dishonorably.

Team Homicide is at an impass. We truly believe that our man Ezzard Charles is the best light heavyweight to of ever lived. Problem is, that DRAW verdict we had with Loughran. That is a blemish that needs to be corrected. If Mr. Loughran would accept, we would like an immediate rematch. Because of that draw, and because Mr. Gibbons had a split decision, it makes it impossible for us to fight one another---- unless we have misunderstood the rules of the commission. If Mr. Loughran refuses the challenge we will have to debate who is worthy. We at team Homicide would like to fight someone we haven't yet fought already if Mr. Loughran refuses. And the only ones available to us in the rankings that fit that criteria are: Choynski and Bivins. It comes down to Mr. Loughran. Jesus bless.

HomicideHenry wrote:Team Homicide is at an impass. We truly believe that our man Ezzard Charles is the best light heavyweight to of ever lived. Problem is, that DRAW verdict we had with Loughran. That is a blemish that needs to be corrected. If Mr. Loughran would accept, we would like an immediate rematch. Because of that draw, and because Mr. Gibbons had a split decision, it makes it impossible for us to fight one another---- unless we have misunderstood the rules of the commission. If Mr. Loughran refuses the challenge we will have to debate who is worthy. We at team Homicide would like to fight someone we haven't yet fought already if Mr. Loughran refuses. And the only ones available to us in the rankings that fit that criteria are: Choynski and Bivins. It comes down to Mr. Loughran. Jesus bless.

If you have decided to offer Loughran an immediate rematch, count us in sir. We thank you for the rematch. Hopefully another good fight, with a different result......

bengulnaci1 wrote:New IBO Champion, Joe Choynski will review his 'options' and post his selection, if that's ok Mr Crease?

Mr Bengul you don't owe anybody anything... You agreed to a title fight last week and you won it.

Mr DMA issued an open challenge to anyone and you answered it. Mr DMA feels that he has been cheated somehow because BoxBuzz made an honest mistake with the matchups - however, on the face of it - Roy Jones Jr has been given even more experience after his beatdown of the unmanaged Steve Choynski.

Mr Bengul, the facts are that you may choose how to defend against any fighter that you so wish - (providing he is ranked 15th or below).

That is all.

HomicideHenry wrote:If Mr. Loughran would accept, we would like an immediate rematch.

armageto wrote:If you have decided to offer Loughran an immediate rematch, count us in sir.

So Charles vs Loughran is signed.

And the Undisputed Title will not be fought for this week.

Bernard Hopkins has agreed a fight against with Joe Knight this week.

Tommy Burns calls out the newly crowned Joe Choynski for a bout.

BoxBuzz wrote:UNMATCHED FIGHTERS
BENGULNACI1 - JOE CHOYNSKI
BIGJUICYHOG - BOB FITZSIMMONS, FLOYD PATTERSON
BOXBUZZ - TOMMY GIBBONS, KID NORFOLK
CREASE - TOMMY BURNS
DETROITHXC - OLD STRIBLING, MICHAEL MOORER
DMA1987 - ROY JONES JR, STANLEY KETCHEL
FIST OF LEGEND - MAXIE ROSENBLOOM
FRILLA - JOSE TORRES
GLITTERMONKEY - ARCHIE MOORE, DARIUSZ MICHALCZEWSKI
JDC - PHILADELPHIA JACK O'BRIEN, HAROLD JOHNSON
KEVO - MICHAEL SPINKS, BILLY FOX
P4P1 - SAM LANGFORD, FREDDIE MILLS
SOCKDOLAGER - BOB FOSTER, YOUNG FIRPO
TECHNO89 - HARRY GREB

Having spoken to Joe, the fairest thing to do, in this case (and Buzz, no apology was required ), is to offer RJJ a return shot at the IBO title, if the Commish's agree.

That way the winner can proceed on and offer challenges to those deemed worthy. Ok with you, Andrews?

PS If Loughran had declined the Charles fight, Joe would have LOVED to have separated Charles from his titles (and senses!) but alas, it was not to be.

Crease wrote:

HomicideHenry wrote:If Mr. Loughran would accept, we would like an immediate rematch.

armageto wrote:If you have decided to offer Loughran an immediate rematch, count us in sir.

So Charles vs Loughran is signed.

And the Undisputed Title will not be fought for this week.

What in the hell is the deal with that? They've been the Top 2 guys now for several weeks now.

Your fighter destroyed RJJ really so we have no issues with you as champion Ben .

The problem was with the commissioners calling RJJ back from his hookers and booze victory party and making him defend again. The corrupt IBO gave him 'top condition', we won't fight for that organisation again.

bengulnaci1 wrote:Having spoken to Joe, the fairest thing to do, in this case (and Buzz, no apology was required ), is to offer RJJ a return shot at the IBO title, if the Commish's agree.

Fair play to you for doing that, Choynski vs Jones Jr rematch is could be signed for the IBO Title.

Obviously if this fight goes ahead, Mr Frilla will not be happy about this, because he wants his fighter, Jose Torres to challenge for the IBO strap. But it it goes ahead, then Torres won't get his shot this week
- as a matter of fact I also called Choynski out, so I wouldn't get the shot either.

It was only an accident what happened last week with Buzz, there was no need for a retribution but I applaud your attitude toward this situation Mr Bengul, you have been gracious and gentlemanly i dealing with it.

DMA1987 wrote:The problem was with the commissioners calling RJJ back from his hookers and booze victory party and making him defend again. The corrupt IBO gave him 'top condition', we won't fight for that organisation again.

To appease you I could sign a Choynski vs Jones Jr rematch as a non-title fight, for this week only.

A difficult one. One IBO title and 3 people who want a shot. if Andrews is ok with this, I would like to offer Torres a shot and the big man, Mr Frilla, has not had a shot of any kind for either of his fighters, I believe.

The only reason I would offer this Torres ahead of your fighter Commish Crease, is that he asked for the shot first. Not a great way to decide but probably the best way I can think of.

Frilla, do you and Torres agree, mate?

I would also say that this situation has highlighted an ongoing issue in the Sim.

Instead of certain Managers having a pop at BoxBuzz for making a genuine administration error, I would categorally state that BoxBuzz is doing a sensational job and I would never throw him under the bus just to "jump on the band wagon" as the old saying goes - I think too much of him as a fellow Commish.

Now, let's deal with the issue I highlighted earlier - and that is these "open challenges" which are frequently voiced here week-after-week. And sometimes
(it doesn't happen all the time and only by a minority of Managers)
Managers declare "open challenges" to fight anyone, then they are matched up with the first guy to answer the challenge, then the guy beats the Manager's fighter and they say: "I didn't agree to fight HIM"... etc... etc...

This is part of the reason why I encourage you Managers to name CPU backups... Honestly, they're the best option, instead of the Commish's picking fights for you...

bengulnaci1 wrote:A difficult one. One IBO title and 3 people who want a shot.

Well, from the looks of things DMA1987 has said that he does not want to fight for the IBO title.

bengulnaci1 wrote: if Andrews is ok with this, I would like to offer Torres a shot and the big man, Mr Frilla, has not had a shot of any kind for either of his fighters, I believe.

Normally I would undersign this rightaway, but it's getting a bit messy with numerous parties getitng involved with this. I'll hush up and let you guys decide amongst yourselves.

bengulnaci1 wrote:The only reason I would offer this Torres ahead of your fighter Commish Crease, is that he asked for the shot first. Not a great way to decide but probably the best way I can think of.

No worries mate, it's your call.

gilgamesh wrote:What in the hell is the deal with that? They've been the Top 2 guys now for several weeks now.

Well, as I said before earlier in this thread, you cannot please everyone.

Crease wrote:I would also say that this situation has highlighted an ongoing issue in the Sim.

Instead of certain Managers having a pop at BoxBuzz for making a genuine administration error, I would categorally state that BoxBuzz is doing a sensational job and I would never throw him under the bus just to "jump on the band wagon" as the old saying goes - I think too much of him as a fellow Commish.

Now, let's deal with the issue I highlighted earlier - and that is these "open challenges" which are frequently voiced here week-after-week. And sometimes
(it doesn't happen all the time and only by a minority of Managers)
Managers declare "open challenges" to fight anyone, then they are matched up with the first guy to answer the challenge, then the guy beats the Manager's fighter and they say: "I didn't agree to fight HIM"... etc... etc...

This is part of the reason why I encourage you Managers to name CPU backups... Honestly, they're the best option, instead of the Commish's picking fights for you...

You keep mentioning open challenges Crease. I offered Choynski the shot directly.

As for the rematch, RJJ doesn't do the IBO title no mo. Cheers though Ben, top bloke

Crease wrote:I would also say that this situation has highlighted an ongoing issue in the Sim.

Instead of certain Managers having a pop at BoxBuzz for making a genuine administration error, I would categorally state that BoxBuzz is doing a sensational job and I would never throw him under the bus just to "jump on the band wagon" as the old saying goes - I think too much of him as a fellow Commish.

Quite right, you're both doing a stellar job


'Buzz, seeing as how Charles has bitched out of a fight with your man, how about putting him in with Spinx?

DMA1987 wrote:You keep mentioning open challenges Crease. I offered Choynski the shot directly.

Yes, you did last week. But the evidence which backs up my statement is undeniable, Managers have been doing it for many season now.

kevo wrote:

Crease wrote:I would also say that this situation has highlighted an ongoing issue in the Sim.

Instead of certain Managers having a pop at BoxBuzz for making a genuine administration error, I would categorally state that BoxBuzz is doing a sensational job and I would never throw him under the bus just to "jump on the band wagon" as the old saying goes - I think too much of him as a fellow Commish.

Quite right, you're both doing a stellar job


'Buzz, seeing as how Charles has bitched out of a fight with your man, how about putting him in with Spinx?

At this point I have not read Homeside's decision...but by god if he's ducking Gibbons....well, he's just what I've always suspected....all talk and not back bone. This is borderline comical....is he REALLY DUCKING GIBBONS? HAHAHAAAAHAAA woooooeeee! Now that's some chickenshyt management if there ever was some.

Now...as for Spinks....simply answer the following questionnaire to see if your fighter qualifies.


1. Does your fighter hit hard?
2. Does your fighter have a good offense?
3. Does your fighter have a good defense?
5. Does your fighter have a credible record to attempt to match skills with the Gibber?
5.a Does your fighter agree to sign a "release of liability" should he be hurt, maimed or killed during this fight?
6. Does your fighter agree that when things get tough, he will give up mid fight?
7. Does your fighter agree to have the fight in the Gibbers back yard?
8. Do you agree to accept a small token of appreciation in compensation for a "workable agreement" ?

Let's see how you answer these question...and we will take this matter under advisement.

HomicideHenry wrote:Team Homicide is an imp's ass.

Well well if this doesn't explain everything, I don't know what does.

Upon stark reflection....we remain leery of accepting a fight with Kevo and Spunks.

Gibbons has been having nightmares, and needs to seek counseling. He also needs to attend to his Maserati, he has developed a bad case of halitosis, and stress induced thrush, and his girlfriend has been bitching at him lately.

Not good times for the champ.

We were hoping Bivins would accept his invitation that has been offered several times.

We also feel that Kevo has been neglecting his beard.

BoxBuzz wrote:
We also feel that Kevo has been neglecting his beard.

Now why you gots ta bring my beard into this, 'Buzz? You just made this personal.