Page 2 of 2
Re: Jack Johnson
Posted: 21 Sep 2013, 19:32
by SaadOffTheDeck
No you didn't.
I know it's difficult for a mentally challenged individual like yourself to understand. Middleweight & Light Heavyweight don't factor in Heavyweight rankings. But keep going with the long posts, I'm enjoying ignoring them.

Re: Jack Johnson
Posted: 21 Sep 2013, 19:43
by HomicideHenry
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:No you didn't.
I know it's difficult for a mentally challenged individual like yourself to understand. Middleweight & Light Heavyweight don't factor in Heavyweight rankings. But keep going with the long posts, I'm enjoying ignoring them.

It doesnt matter regardless lol thats what you dont understand cus what Fitz did at heavyweight line surpasses anything Tunney did at HW too.
Re: Jack Johnson
Posted: 21 Sep 2013, 20:00
by SaadOffTheDeck
The truly sad thing is that you don't even understand what you type.
Re: Jack Johnson
Posted: 21 Sep 2013, 20:09
by Seamus
I have to disagree Ezzard. Jack Johnson last fought Joe Jeanette in 1906. I'm not saying that wasn't a good win, but Jeanette didn't start to really peak for about another 5 years, and obviously he was another deserving fighter who Johnson didn't defend his title against.
Re: Jack Johnson
Posted: 22 Sep 2013, 00:12
by dempseyfire
Seamus wrote:I have to disagree Ezzard. Jack Johnson last fought Joe Jeanette in 1906. I'm not saying that wasn't a good win, but Jeanette didn't start to really peak for about another 5 years, and obviously he was another deserving fighter who Johnson didn't defend his title against.
5 years later? Just before his last loss to Johnson he beat Langford and right after beat McVey and went on a long winning streak in which he only lost to the two Sams until 1912 (minus one loss to Ferguson promptly avenged). I think one can say Jeannette was entering his prime by the time of his last bout with Johnson.