Page 2 of 2

Re: Jack Johnson

Posted: 21 Sep 2013, 19:32
by SaadOffTheDeck
No you didn't. :zzz:

I know it's difficult for a mentally challenged individual like yourself to understand. Middleweight & Light Heavyweight don't factor in Heavyweight rankings. But keep going with the long posts, I'm enjoying ignoring them. :TU:

Re: Jack Johnson

Posted: 21 Sep 2013, 19:43
by HomicideHenry
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:No you didn't. :zzz:

I know it's difficult for a mentally challenged individual like yourself to understand. Middleweight & Light Heavyweight don't factor in Heavyweight rankings. But keep going with the long posts, I'm enjoying ignoring them. :TU:
It doesnt matter regardless lol thats what you dont understand cus what Fitz did at heavyweight line surpasses anything Tunney did at HW too.

Re: Jack Johnson

Posted: 21 Sep 2013, 20:00
by SaadOffTheDeck
The truly sad thing is that you don't even understand what you type.

Re: Jack Johnson

Posted: 21 Sep 2013, 20:09
by Seamus
I have to disagree Ezzard. Jack Johnson last fought Joe Jeanette in 1906. I'm not saying that wasn't a good win, but Jeanette didn't start to really peak for about another 5 years, and obviously he was another deserving fighter who Johnson didn't defend his title against.

Re: Jack Johnson

Posted: 22 Sep 2013, 00:12
by dempseyfire
Seamus wrote:I have to disagree Ezzard. Jack Johnson last fought Joe Jeanette in 1906. I'm not saying that wasn't a good win, but Jeanette didn't start to really peak for about another 5 years, and obviously he was another deserving fighter who Johnson didn't defend his title against.
5 years later? Just before his last loss to Johnson he beat Langford and right after beat McVey and went on a long winning streak in which he only lost to the two Sams until 1912 (minus one loss to Ferguson promptly avenged). I think one can say Jeannette was entering his prime by the time of his last bout with Johnson.