Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez
Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:31
Cotto not warming up?
Code: Select all
# Winner Deductions Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Crawford [***]
2 Crawford [** ]
3 Crawford [***]
4 Crawford [***]
5 Crawford [***]
6 Crawford [***]
7 Crawford [***]
8 Crawford [* ]
9 Crawford [***]
10 Crawford [***]
11 [ ]
12 [ ]
Final Scorecard
Crawford 100-90
Widest Range of Scores (Giving each fighter all [ ] rounds)
Crawford 100-90 to Crawford 100-90
Widest Range of Scores (Giving each fighter all [ ] and [* ] rounds)
Crawford 100-90 to Crawford 99-91
Total Star Count (minus pt deductions) (Who "felt" like the winner)
Crawford 27 | Klimov 0
Confidence Scale
------------------
[***] - Impossible to score it differently. Usually the loser gets hurt or does basically nothing.
[** ] - Definite reach to score it differently.
[* ] - Arguable, but a likely score.
[ ] - Could've went to either fighter or scored even.
MPD = Mandatory point deductions (knockdown, penalty).
NMPD = Non-mandatory point deductions.Crawford didn't land much other than jabs, even though the power punch stats seem to indicate differently... hardly anything he landed clean had any pop. THAT is boring.Tanzio wrote:What I can't stand about the criticism by the announcers of this fight is that they are consciously feeding into the boo birds. Crawford fought an excellent, clean fight. He boxed extremely well. He got good rounds in. I was not overly impressed but he was fighting a decent boxer who was not a threat but was not especially easy to touch.
He definitely showed some vulnerability, imo, but this was worth watching. That crapfest earlier today was an utter waste of too many of the limited ticks of the clock I have left.JCS wrote:Crawford didn't land much other than jabs, even though the power punch stats seem to indicate differently... hardly anything he landed clean had any pop. THAT is boring.Tanzio wrote:What I can't stand about the criticism by the announcers of this fight is that they are consciously feeding into the boo birds. Crawford fought an excellent, clean fight. He boxed extremely well. He got good rounds in. I was not overly impressed but he was fighting a decent boxer who was not a threat but was not especially easy to touch.
Was more entertaining than this fight simply because it was for the Heavyweight Championship of the World. This fight sucked and meant very little. Enough talk about it.Tanzio wrote:He definitely showed some vulnerability, imo, but this was worth watching. That crapfest earlier today was an utter waste of too many of the limited ticks of the clock I have left.JCS wrote:Crawford didn't land much other than jabs, even though the power punch stats seem to indicate differently... hardly anything he landed clean had any pop. THAT is boring.Tanzio wrote:What I can't stand about the criticism by the announcers of this fight is that they are consciously feeding into the boo birds. Crawford fought an excellent, clean fight. He boxed extremely well. He got good rounds in. I was not overly impressed but he was fighting a decent boxer who was not a threat but was not especially easy to touch.
Your wet dream sucked today. Embarrassed himself. Utterly putrid.gilgamesh wrote:Was more entertaining than this fight simply because it was for the Heavyweight Championship of the World. This fight sucked and meant very little. Enough talk about it.Tanzio wrote:He definitely showed some vulnerability, imo, but this was worth watching. That crapfest earlier today was an utter waste of too many of the limited ticks of the clock I have left.JCS wrote:
Crawford didn't land much other than jabs, even though the power punch stats seem to indicate differently... hardly anything he landed clean had any pop. THAT is boring.
Cotto vs Rodriguez coming up. Certainly going to be the best fight of the day.
Crawford-Klimov and Wlad-Povetkin combinedBaby Face Finster wrote:This first round already had more excitement than all 10 rounds of Crawford-Klimov combined.