Page 2 of 3

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:31
by Tanzio
Cotto not warming up?

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:32
by Tanzio
90-81 Crawford

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:36
by Tanzio
100-90 crawford

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:36
by JCS

Code: Select all

#  Winner         Deductions         Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1  Crawford [***] 
2  Crawford [** ] 
3  Crawford [***] 
4  Crawford [***] 
5  Crawford [***]
6  Crawford [***]
7  Crawford [***]
8  Crawford [*  ]
9  Crawford [***]
10 Crawford [***]
11  [   ]   
12  [   ]   


Final Scorecard
Crawford 100-90

Widest Range of Scores (Giving each fighter all [   ] rounds)
Crawford 100-90 to Crawford 100-90

Widest Range of Scores (Giving each fighter all [   ] and [*  ] rounds)
Crawford 100-90 to Crawford 99-91

Total Star Count (minus pt deductions) (Who "felt" like the winner)
Crawford 27 | Klimov 0


Confidence Scale
------------------

[***] - Impossible to score it differently.  Usually the loser gets hurt or does basically nothing.
[** ] - Definite reach to score it differently.
[*  ] - Arguable, but a likely score.
[   ] - Could've went to either fighter or scored even.

MPD  = Mandatory point deductions (knockdown, penalty).
NMPD = Non-mandatory point deductions.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:37
by gilgamesh
Glad that sh*t's over. I didn't even care to watch most of the bout.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:39
by gilgamesh
No doubt Cotto vs Rodriguez will be the most exciting bout of the day :box:

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:40
by Tanzio
What I can't stand about the criticism by the announcers of this fight is that they are consciously feeding into the boo birds. Crawford fought an excellent, clean fight. He boxed extremely well. He got good rounds in. I was not overly impressed but he was fighting a decent boxer who was not a threat but was not especially easy to touch.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:41
by JCS
Tanzio wrote:What I can't stand about the criticism by the announcers of this fight is that they are consciously feeding into the boo birds. Crawford fought an excellent, clean fight. He boxed extremely well. He got good rounds in. I was not overly impressed but he was fighting a decent boxer who was not a threat but was not especially easy to touch.
Crawford didn't land much other than jabs, even though the power punch stats seem to indicate differently... hardly anything he landed clean had any pop. THAT is boring.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:45
by Tanzio
JCS wrote:
Tanzio wrote:What I can't stand about the criticism by the announcers of this fight is that they are consciously feeding into the boo birds. Crawford fought an excellent, clean fight. He boxed extremely well. He got good rounds in. I was not overly impressed but he was fighting a decent boxer who was not a threat but was not especially easy to touch.
Crawford didn't land much other than jabs, even though the power punch stats seem to indicate differently... hardly anything he landed clean had any pop. THAT is boring.
He definitely showed some vulnerability, imo, but this was worth watching. That crapfest earlier today was an utter waste of too many of the limited ticks of the clock I have left.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:46
by JCS
For christ sake, it's almost midnight.... let's delay this BS some more.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:46
by gilgamesh
Tanzio wrote:
JCS wrote:
Tanzio wrote:What I can't stand about the criticism by the announcers of this fight is that they are consciously feeding into the boo birds. Crawford fought an excellent, clean fight. He boxed extremely well. He got good rounds in. I was not overly impressed but he was fighting a decent boxer who was not a threat but was not especially easy to touch.
Crawford didn't land much other than jabs, even though the power punch stats seem to indicate differently... hardly anything he landed clean had any pop. THAT is boring.
He definitely showed some vulnerability, imo, but this was worth watching. That crapfest earlier today was an utter waste of too many of the limited ticks of the clock I have left.
Was more entertaining than this fight simply because it was for the Heavyweight Championship of the World. This fight sucked and meant very little. Enough talk about it.

Cotto vs Rodriguez coming up. Certainly going to be the best fight of the day.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:51
by Tanzio
Cotto - what's not to like . . . and I like Rodriguez too.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:52
by JCS
boobs

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:52
by gilgamesh
WAR MIGUEL!!! :box:

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:53
by diddy
Holy Tecate girl on the right. Delicious.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:54
by Tanzio
gilgamesh wrote:
Tanzio wrote:
JCS wrote:
Crawford didn't land much other than jabs, even though the power punch stats seem to indicate differently... hardly anything he landed clean had any pop. THAT is boring.
He definitely showed some vulnerability, imo, but this was worth watching. That crapfest earlier today was an utter waste of too many of the limited ticks of the clock I have left.
Was more entertaining than this fight simply because it was for the Heavyweight Championship of the World. This fight sucked and meant very little. Enough talk about it.

Cotto vs Rodriguez coming up. Certainly going to be the best fight of the day.
Your wet dream sucked today. Embarrassed himself. Utterly putrid.

Crawford vs Klimov was a superior boxing match.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:57
by diddy
90 seconds in....Rodriguez has no chance in this fight.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:57
by Baby Face Finster
This first round already had more excitement than all 10 rounds of Crawford-Klimov combined.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:57
by gilgamesh
Clear 1st round for Cotto.

10-9 Cotto

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:58
by Tanzio
Round 1 = 10-9 Cotto . . . he is looking crisp so far.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:58
by gilgamesh
Baby Face Finster wrote:This first round already had more excitement than all 10 rounds of Crawford-Klimov combined.
Crawford-Klimov and Wlad-Povetkin combined :lol:

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 23:59
by diddy
Will be surprised if Rodriguez makes it more than halfway through this fight.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 06 Oct 2013, 00:01
by JCS
Rodriguez just got hit with a sonic boom at the end of the round.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 06 Oct 2013, 00:02
by gilgamesh
Cotto's looking tremendous through 2 rounds. Showing he's on a level that Rodriguez has never seen.

Re: Cotto vs Rodriguez

Posted: 06 Oct 2013, 00:02
by Tanzio
Round 2 = 10-9 Cotto (20-18). Cotto looking clean tonight, severe.