Page 2 of 2

Re: Tom Stalker and Scott Cardle

Posted: 10 Oct 2013, 04:45
by bigB
mickey1975 wrote:
bigB wrote:Minimum British title for them both IMO

Cardle has huge potential think when he gets frustrated he makes errors and boxes alot worst than i've seen him but think that's down to the level of opponents. Maxi Hughes he was class against. Lightweight division is red hot in the UK aswell right now.

Stalker is a older pro but his amateur pedigree gives him alot of experience so gain British/Commonwealth maybe European.
Would you tip him to beat Saunders? They should be hitting title level at a similar time?
Be a good fight to see, Saunders looked good the other night on the Ormond undercard 50/50 match-up

Re: Tom Stalker and Scott Cardle

Posted: 10 Oct 2013, 04:51
by WelshJack
sweetscience wrote:
WelshJack wrote:
boxinggreat wrote:i think some of the negative hating trolls on here lacking knowledge need to look up Stalker's amateur achievements

World Championship Bronze medalist
European Silver medalist x 2
Commonwealth games Gold medalist

Was ranked World number 1 in his weight before the olympics
go to the quarter finals of the olympics and was clearly ROBBED of a medal, it it wasn't for that robbery he would have been the only british fighter ever to medal at every major tournament.

There is absolutely no way he will 'struggle to get to british level' or british title level max'

you don't know how stupid you sound,he beat the likes of Domenico Valentino.
I want you to save this. He will not win the British title outright from what I've seen of him, no trolling just an opinion.
Why have you added outright to your claim?

What's that got to do with levels in pro boxing
I said he will be British title max and I believe that. Of course I want him to do well, but I just don't see what you do.

Re: Tom Stalker and Scott Cardle

Posted: 10 Oct 2013, 04:53
by mickey1975
bigB wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
bigB wrote:Minimum British title for them both IMO

Cardle has huge potential think when he gets frustrated he makes errors and boxes alot worst than i've seen him but think that's down to the level of opponents. Maxi Hughes he was class against. Lightweight division is red hot in the UK aswell right now.

Stalker is a older pro but his amateur pedigree gives him alot of experience so gain British/Commonwealth maybe European.
Would you tip him to beat Saunders? They should be hitting title level at a similar time?
Be a good fight to see, Saunders looked good the other night on the Ormond undercard 50/50 match-up
He's looked good in every fight and always fought on the road. Flintoff bill, Luxembourg, dinner show... Will be great to see him in the North East next time(still a good drive from his home though!).

Re: Tom Stalker and Scott Cardle

Posted: 10 Oct 2013, 14:43
by boxinggreat
[/quote]
Robbed at home, in the Olympics, not sure I buy that one. Audley Harrison won an Olympic gold medal, what a great pro he's been. Johnny Nelson had 13 amateur fights and won 3, he went on to be world champion for 6 years. Being a good amateur doesn't make you a good pro, he's looked poor and he's 29, so he'll have to be moved quickly and everyone in the top 10 in the country beats him right now.[/quote]
hello felllow prestonian
lol people always point to the audley harrison theory... how predictable

fact is .. 'most' top amateurs become top pros, most of them

just look who was olympic or world championship medalists..... Mayweather, W Klitschko, Froch, Golovkin, Rigondeux, etc etc

and you can't really go off age either, most of the top 20 p4p fighters are in their 30s

I don't think you people on here actualy watch the amateurs, Stalker was a brilliant amateur, really good, he has a lot of talent. I'll say it right now - there is 100% no way he will fail to get to british title level.... absolutely no chance... it is beyond trolling for people to say that you don;t know how stupid you sound.


light welterweight division is so fornicating weak right now in britain, darren hamilton is one of the weakest ever british champs

look at the top 10 in britain right now
1 Darren Hamilton
2 Lenny Daws
3 Kirk Goodings
4 Adil Anwar
5 Steve Williams
6 Tyrone Nurse
7 Willie Limond
8 Chris Jenkins
9 Dave Ryan
10 John Wayne Hibbert

to say all 10 of these would beat him is 100% ridiculous trolling of the highest order

Theres only Chris Jenkins and Darren Hamilton who would give him a fight right now, but with Stalkers talent and amateur pedigree hed have to be favourite
all the rest he'd box there heads off and would hardly lose a round
it's an extremely weak division

Re: Tom Stalker and Scott Cardle

Posted: 10 Oct 2013, 14:46
by Adamj1987
Not sure aut stalker but cardle i think euro is a good shout for him as long as his cuts do t get too bad due to him seeming to have ne in last few fights

Re: Tom Stalker and Scott Cardle

Posted: 10 Oct 2013, 17:20
by mickey1975
Boxingreat is a troll. And a crap one at that.

Re: Tom Stalker and Scott Cardle

Posted: 10 Oct 2013, 17:22
by lefty
boxinggreat wrote:
Robbed at home, in the Olympics, not sure I buy that one. Audley Harrison won an Olympic gold medal, what a great pro he's been. Johnny Nelson had 13 amateur fights and won 3, he went on to be world champion for 6 years. Being a good amateur doesn't make you a good pro, he's looked poor and he's 29, so he'll have to be moved quickly and everyone in the top 10 in the country beats him right now.[/quote]
hello felllow prestonian
lol people always point to the audley harrison theory... how predictable

fact is .. 'most' top amateurs become top pros, most of them

just look who was olympic or world championship medalists..... Mayweather, W Klitschko, Froch, Golovkin, Rigondeux, etc etc

and you can't really go off age either, most of the top 20 p4p fighters are in their 30s

I don't think you people on here actualy watch the amateurs, Stalker was a brilliant amateur, really good, he has a lot of talent. I'll say it right now - there is 100% no way he will fail to get to british title level.... absolutely no chance... it is beyond trolling for people to say that you don;t know how stupid you sound.


light welterweight division is so effing weak right now in britain, darren hamilton is one of the weakest ever british champs

look at the top 10 in britain right now
1 Darren Hamilton
2 Lenny Daws
3 Kirk Goodings
4 Adil Anwar
5 Steve Williams
6 Tyrone Nurse
7 Willie Limond
8 Chris Jenkins
9 Dave Ryan
10 John Wayne Hibbert

to say all 10 of these would beat him is 100% ridiculous trolling of the highest order

Theres only Chris Jenkins and Darren Hamilton who would give him a fight right now, but with Stalkers talent and amateur pedigree hed have to be favourite
all the rest he'd box there heads off and would hardly lose a round
it's an extremely weak division[/quote]
He was a great amateur no doubt but he's looked absolute turd as a pro so far.

Re: Tom Stalker and Scott Cardle

Posted: 10 Oct 2013, 18:14
by iamasadlittleboy
Wasn't Shiming a great amateur...or Yan Barthelemy...

Re: Tom Stalker and Scott Cardle

Posted: 10 Oct 2013, 18:17
by lefty
iamasadlittleboy wrote:Wasn't Shiming a great amateur...or Yan Barthelemy...
Yep. Also who was that guy that Cotto battered that beat him in the olympics and then went on to win Gold?

Re: Tom Stalker and Scott Cardle

Posted: 10 Oct 2013, 18:37
by boxinggreat
mickey1975 wrote:Boxingreat is a troll. And a crap one at that.
i aint a troll you doughnut, stalker has a lot of ability.
I expect him to adjust to the pros and be a big success, all top fighters can adjust,

anyone who says he will 'struggle' to get to domestic level is 100% a troll
I just can't imagine the world number 1 at his weight class failing to become british champ in a weak division theres no chance of that happening no matter how shit you think he looks so far, even audley won a european title

Re: Tom Stalker and Scott Cardle

Posted: 10 Oct 2013, 18:58
by expe
boxinggreat wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:Boxingreat is a troll. And a crap one at that.
i aint a troll you doughnut, stalker has a lot of ability.
I expect him to adjust to the pros and be a big success, all top fighters can adjust,

anyone who says he will 'struggle' to get to domestic level is 100% a troll
I just can't imagine the world number 1 at his weight class failing to become british champ in a weak division theres no chance of that happening no matter how poo you think he looks so far, even audley won a european title
Audley won a European title in the one moment of heart he has ever shown in a boxing ring. He was losing and pulled out the big punch. I fail to see how someone who didn't medal at the Olympics and won bronze at the worlds could be number 1 in his division. Not all top fighters adjust, Shiming has struggled, Audley did, Tony Jeffries as well.

Re: Tom Stalker and Scott Cardle

Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 17:11
by boxinggreat
expe wrote:
boxinggreat wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
I fail to see how someone who didn't medal at the Olympics and won bronze at the worlds could be number 1 in his division. Not all top fighters adjust, Shiming has struggled, Audley did, Tony Jeffries as well.
If you'd read my earlier posts or if you followed amateur boxing you'd know I meant before the Olympic games he was ranked world number 1 at his weight, to be the number 1 he was obviously the most consistent world class fighter in his weight class, he was the number 1 seed at the olympics, and clearly got robbed in the quarter finals.

Stalker is one of our best prospects, trust me if you don't see it now you'll see it very soon

Re: Tom Stalker and Scott Cardle

Posted: 13 Oct 2013, 17:13
by iamasadlittleboy
....Tom...is that you?