Page 2 of 2

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 21 Oct 2013, 07:13
by curtis wood
I don't want a shot at anything, 4 6 8 10 12 rounder, all the same to me, if hes having a warm up fight then I fit the bill perfectly surly? come to win, give him a decent test but one he should come through if he is going to challenge the big boys again, its not about winning any micky mouse belt its about having a fight with him, I don't like him and when men don't like each other they normally fight

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 21 Oct 2013, 07:14
by danconnollyeire
mickey1975 wrote:
gman tilz wrote:Met Paul and his Dad in Vilamoura, Portugal last year, was very down to earth and a genuinely nice guy, me and my brother had a good chat with him, I thought he was unlucky against Khan and put up a good fight, I personally would not say he is prick but obv don't know whats gone on, I would take him to beat Curtis by KO.

I have great respect for what Curtis has done but Paul is a quite a few classes above in my opinion.
Have you seen the Khan fight or are you going on what Paul told you? He never, by any description, "put up a good fight"!
I thought the fight was a bit harsh as it was undoubted Paul's 'big shot' but he was being beat well by Khan, who was heading towards a late stoppage IMO. It was a fight that should never have been made in the first place (although there's much worse defenses).

I never got the whole, McCloskey was holding out for a late surge. He's not a big puncher and Khan doesn't lack fitness

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 21 Oct 2013, 07:27
by JamieM
Curtis is a legend haha, hes spot on though surely a warm up fight hed fit the bill, isnt coming to be bowled over. In truth McCloskey should be levels above Curtis and has a bit more about his game but Curtis can bang and is game as they come. Im not keen on McCloskey myself.Was an arrogant asshole after the khan fight when in truth he was terrible.

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 21 Oct 2013, 07:29
by gman tilz
I choose to go down the route of A best out of three game of rock, paper, scissors to settle my disputes, If that fails then I guess it just has to be a tear up.

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 21 Oct 2013, 08:14
by Roars Like Me
'It's not a tickling contest' as Ricky once said but you could go down that route - it would be funnier and a lot less painful.

If Paul still doens't laugh however then he really is an arsehole :D

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 21 Oct 2013, 08:24
by milpool
I wasn't joking about bringing McCloskey to Hull next month. Is there any chance he could be the opponent for Curtis?
McCloskey was bemoaning the fact he hasn't fought in ages, he's a Hearn fighter so why not??

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 21 Oct 2013, 09:01
by gman tilz
Roars Like Me wrote:'It's not a tickling contest' as Ricky once said but you could go down that route - it would be funnier and a lot less painful.

If Paul still doens't laugh however then he really is an arsehole :D
Touche!

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 21 Oct 2013, 10:33
by tilt
hahahaha is right curtis

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 21 Oct 2013, 15:03
by cocobongo
Fair play to Curtis playing to his strengths his ability to talk gets him into fights without being disrespectful he hasn't really done anything to deserve, I hope he gets this shot I see Mcloskey out pointing him widely but always a chance Curtis can hurt him and he has been much more active than Paul , much worse comeback fights out there!

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 21 Oct 2013, 15:05
by lefty
cocobongo wrote:Fair play to Curtis playing to his strengths his ability to talk gets him into fights without being disrespectful he hasn't really done anything to deserve, I hope he gets this shot I see Mcloskey out pointing him widely but always a chance Curtis can hurt him and he has been much more active than Paul , much worse comeback fights out there!
I think Curtis can hurt him aswell. I dont think Mccloskey has got the best chin in the world.

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 21 Oct 2013, 16:43
by hurlock
I think Curtis is abit of a crank ha!

He got hit hard in his last fight & made him worse!

I understand Curtis wants to be in meaningful matches but he needs some moderate opposition & get his game back together.
I think Curtis needs to see that Samuel.L.Jackson speech on pride.

Curtis "the crank " woodhouse! :OhYes:

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 22 Oct 2013, 06:13
by rhino222
Come on paul mcloskey, grow a pair and fight curtis, he is only a footballer. Will du or wont du - dey all say the same.

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 22 Oct 2013, 06:15
by rhino222
Curtis - would you do a prizefighter? Would love to see you inthat format of the game.

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 22 Oct 2013, 18:25
by rhino222
Curtis - would you do a prizefighter? Would love to see you inthat format of the game.

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 23 Oct 2013, 03:11
by Tomasino
rhino222 wrote:Come on paul mcloskey, grow a pair and fight curtis, he is only a footballer. Will du or wont du - dey all say the same.

:roll:

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 23 Oct 2013, 08:00
by Fergz16COTJ
milpool wrote:I wasn't joking about bringing McCloskey to Hull next month. Is there any chance he could be the opponent for Curtis?
McCloskey was bemoaning the fact he hasn't fought in ages, he's a Hearn fighter so why not??
He's not a Hearn fighter anymore

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 23 Oct 2013, 09:51
by macaca
hahahahaha :OhYes: Great post!!! I love the, he is better than me but I don't give a fornicate attitude, like someone else said, pity we have to watch Larry and Toney avoid heart attacks and not you two.

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 23 Oct 2013, 10:19
by curtis wood
in the good old days fighters just wanted to fight, win or lose they just wanted to get in and show what they had, them days have gone, now everybody has a legacy and wants to be put in fights they know they have a 90% chance of winning, too many superstars not enough old school fighters, im a fighter, I just wanna fight, and if I lose then so be it, shhit happens

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 23 Oct 2013, 10:27
by Tomasino
curtis wood wrote:in the good old days fighters just wanted to fight, win or lose they just wanted to get in and show what they had, them days have gone, now everybody has a legacy and wants to be put in fights they know they have a 90% chance of winning, too many superstars not enough old school fighters, im a fighter, I just wanna fight, and if I lose then so be it, shhit happens

Anybody saying your a footballer not a fighter is out of order. You've proved yourself in the hardest sport of all. I was a doubter at the start (cos I don't like football probably) but am a big fan now. I thought you nicked it against Gavin and so did two of three mates who watched it with me. I hope you get a chance to put it on Dudey, we will be rooting for you.

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 23 Oct 2013, 10:29
by palooka
curtis wood wrote:in the good old days fighters just wanted to fight, win or lose they just wanted to get in and show what they had, them days have gone, now everybody has a legacy and wants to be put in fights they know they have a 90% chance of winning, too many superstars not enough old school fighters, im a fighter, I just wanna fight, and if I lose then so be it, shhit happens
It is a commendable way of going about things and it's rare for anything to be personal in a professional sport; you are respected partly because you wear your heart on your sleeve and the boxers that view the sport as a way of improving their (financial) position have to keep their personal feelings out of things and do not want a catastrophic loss on their record where they are back to the drawing board. You've done very well getting to a decent level after being a footballer but being a footballer put you in a financial position that very few boxers are in.

Re: Curtis Woodhouse v Paul Mcclosksey(Twitter beef)

Posted: 23 Oct 2013, 11:08
by TheCobra
Would be interesting to see it after the beef, but I think Curtis you should be rebuilding and having fights for your own career and development as a boxer who is still learning, I think McCloskey is at a higher level and I don't think another KO defeat would really do you any good, even with your commendable attitude of just wanting to fight. Rebuild, keep getting better, keep working towards the British title goal, that's my opinion anyways!