Page 2 of 2

Re: Jimmy Ellis Versus

Posted: 25 Oct 2013, 23:14
by Ambling Alp II
He did have an interesting career. He certainly was thrown to the wolves as a middleweight. Interesting that he didn't stay at lightheavyweight for long. His career did seem to flourish with Dundee. Also interesting that he although he wasn't known as as a bug puncher, he did deck and hurt Bonavena who had a good chin. He also scored several first round knockouts.

I also always thought it was neat that he won his last fight. So many good fighters don't. After to losing the 2nd time to Frazier, he fought one more time. He beat a journeyman to go out a winner.

Re: Jimmy Ellis Versus

Posted: 25 Oct 2013, 23:28
by gilgamesh
Il Duce wrote:1967

Jimmy Ellis vs. Bob Foster

Always thought would have been a great bout at 175 lbs. to 180 lbs.
That's a tough one to call, I'd probably have to favor Foster as Ellis didn't come into his best form until he was a Heavyweight, but it's an interesting matchup all the same.

Re: Jimmy Ellis Versus

Posted: 26 Oct 2013, 07:15
by ThatOne
Il Duce wrote:I'm pretty sure the reason that James 'Jimmy' Ellis took the bout with
Rubin 'Hurricane' Carter in February 1964 at Madison Square Garden was......... 'MONEY'.

Jimmy hadn't had a bout in 5-Months {since September 1963}.

Not every boxer had the 'backing, support and management' as Cassius Clay....

Maybe that's because every boxer doesn't coming home carrying Olympic Gold, Il Manichino.

Re: Jimmy Ellis Versus

Posted: 27 Oct 2013, 16:04
by yancey
gilgamesh wrote:
Il Duce wrote:1967

Jimmy Ellis vs. Bob Foster

Always thought would have been a great bout at 175 lbs. to 180 lbs.
That's a tough one to call, I'd probably have to favor Foster as Ellis didn't come into his best form until he was a Heavyweight, but it's an interesting matchup all the same.
Ellis was a heavyweight by '67.

I'd take him over Foster.