BoxRec

I agree his defence gets exposed at elite level.
You slagged the commentator for saying kell has spite in his punches & just wrote he's got a punchers chance.

As for the spoiler stuff, I've never really got why a fan who don't want to know the result would come on a forum

gazza8 wrote:

DMA1987 wrote: You are not that guy, back to the hole you crawled out of.

Oh I apologise Mr Boxing Authority, that my opinion shows that I am vastly beneath you and your 1900 posts of garbage like above. Lol

Pretty much, classy for admitting it though.

brook needs to have a fight with a topten world class fighter in his next match, if he win a world title then i take my hat off to hime but he needs to step it up now

palooka wrote:I didn't like how you knocked Hatton, it was rude and cruel. You know about boxing and boxing you could make your point better. Brook did a job on a good fellow tonight, no need to knock anyone; and most of blokes I've sucked off have been hung like gherkins

Brook did a good job I agree, but he is chinny and will be found out at world level, he can't carry of the style he boxes at. I do hope I'm wrong but if anyone seriously thinks he beats Bradley, Marquez, alexander, Broner, Maidana etc then they seriously have become detached from reality

A could have made it better although its what Hatton called himself. . .

he goes on like his a world wide super star but they have not heard about him across the pond. he talks as if he has just beaten the best in the division

DMA1987 wrote:

gazza8 wrote:

DMA1987 wrote: You are not that guy, back to the hole you crawled out of.

Oh I apologise Mr Boxing Authority, that my opinion shows that I am vastly beneath you and your 1900 posts of garbage like above. Lol

Pretty much, classy for admitting it though.

As classy as it is that you admit your 1900 posts contain garbage, for that kind Sir, the full Internet as a whole thanks you for you tremendous input to our boxrec experience.

1900 posts and nothing of substance. . . . Is your name Audley Harrison?

YES YOU CAN bore us all to tears

gazza8 wrote:

palooka wrote:I didn't like how you knocked Hatton, it was rude and cruel. You know about boxing and boxing you could make your point better. Brook did a job on a good fellow tonight, no need to knock anyone; and most of blokes I've sucked off have been hung like gherkins

Brook did a good job I agree, but he is chinny and will be found out at world level, he can't carry of the style he boxes at. I do hope I'm wrong but if anyone seriously thinks he beats Bradley, Marquez, alexander, Broner, Maidana etc then they seriously have become detached from reality

A could have made it better although its what Hatton called himself. . .

He isn't chinny FFS. Honestly why do you have to troll? Are you just bored?

you're in a mood tonight gaz, leave the irn bru alone and let things slide a bit; there only opinions about a sport.

Is the Hopkins fight on anywhere?

gazza8 wrote:

DMA1987 wrote:

gazza8 wrote: Oh I apologise Mr Boxing Authority, that my opinion shows that I am vastly beneath you and your 1900 posts of garbage like above. Lol

Pretty much, classy for admitting it though.

As classy as it is that you admit your 1900 posts contain garbage, for that kind Sir, the full Internet as a whole thanks you for you tremendous input to our boxrec experience.

1900 posts and nothing of substance. . . . Is your name Audley Harrison?

YES YOU CAN bore us all to tears

Never seen you post before, and honestly I have no desire to ever see you post again. Just fucking nonsense that you are spouting.

hurlock wrote:I agree his defence gets exposed at elite level.
You slagged the commentator for saying kell has spite in his punches & just wrote he's got a punchers chance.

As for the spoiler stuff, I've never really got why a fan who don't want to know the result would come on a forum

The question of Brook several fights ago, matt hatton time, was that he was too nice. . . So since then every time he fights we are constantly told he has spite in his punches, that was my point there

I believe all he has is a punchers chance because of his style, against the top fighters

DMA1987 wrote:

gazza8 wrote:

palooka wrote:I didn't like how you knocked Hatton, it was rude and cruel. You know about boxing and boxing you could make your point better. Brook did a job on a good fellow tonight, no need to knock anyone; and most of blokes I've sucked off have been hung like gherkins

Brook did a good job I agree, but he is chinny and will be found out at world level, he can't carry of the style he boxes at. I do hope I'm wrong but if anyone seriously thinks he beats Bradley, Marquez, alexander, Broner, Maidana etc then they seriously have become detached from reality

A could have made it better although its what Hatton called himself. . .

He isn't chinny FFS. Honestly why do you have to troll? Are you just bored?

It's my opinion. . . . How can you say he isn't easy to hit??

Why reply? Are you just bored?

gazza8 wrote:

hurlock wrote:I agree his defence gets exposed at elite level.
You slagged the commentator for saying kell has spite in his punches & just wrote he's got a punchers chance.

As for the spoiler stuff, I've never really got why a fan who don't want to know the result would come on a forum

The question of Brook several fights ago, matt hatton time, was that he was too nice. . . So since then every time he fights we are constantly told he has spite in his punches, that was my point there

I believe all he has is a punchers chance because of his style, against the top fighters

So he clearly spite in his punches, but you don't like the commentators mentioning it?

He's looking better the last 3 fights, he is hitting very hard and seems to be more purposeful; I agree he's not going to outslick Devon, outspeed Khan or be a better all rounder than Bradley but he hits hard enough to be in with a shout and he isn't a face first plodder either; he'll do well the next level up but needs to keep busy.

As classy as it is that you admit your 1900 posts contain garbage, for that kind Sir, the full Internet as a whole thanks you for you tremendous input to our boxrec experience.

1900 posts and nothing of substance. . . . Is your name Audley Harrison?

YES YOU CAN bore us all to tears [/quote]

Never seen you post before, and honestly I have no desire to ever see you post again. Just fucking nonsense that you are spouting.[/quote]

Likewise! Bad enough you know everyone that posts, maybe getting a life is in order

Anyway. . . . My OPINION, which forums are based on, not the abuse which you started, is that Kell Brook isn't a world level fighter, he is chinny and easy to hit as his upright style doesn't suit him, he simply won't beat any fighter at world level.

End topic. . . . And if I am wrong please come and tell me, but I think we will find who lacks knowledge

gazza8 wrote:
Likewise! Bad enough you know everyone that posts, maybe getting a life is in order

Anyway. . . . My OPINION, which forums are based on, not the abuse which you started, is that Kell Brook isn't a world level fighter, he is chinny and easy to hit as his upright style doesn't suit him, he simply won't beat any fighter at world level.

End topic. . . . And if I am wrong please come and tell me, but I think we will find who lacks knowledge

Ok mate. You don't seem to know what chinny means, but its fine.

What does sevkovian mean? Anyone, I'm intrigued.

DMA1987 wrote:

gazza8 wrote:
Likewise! Bad enough you know everyone that posts, maybe getting a life is in order

Anyway. . . . My OPINION, which forums are based on, not the abuse which you started, is that Kell Brook isn't a world level fighter, he is chinny and easy to hit as his upright style doesn't suit him, he simply won't beat any fighter at world level.

End topic. . . . And if I am wrong please come and tell me, but I think we will find who lacks knowledge

Ok mate. You don't seem to know what chinny means, but its fine.

Lol Stay tuned and you'll maybe learn something kid.

Anyway it's getting late you hop back into bed with your sister

palooka wrote:What does sevkovian mean? Anyone, I'm intrigued.

Lol google Rangers Sevco

It's an attempt at humor which is totally irrelevant to a boxing forum lol

It's a different world up there isn't it? little digs and sly put downs :(

gazza8 wrote:

DMA1987 wrote:

gazza8 wrote:
Likewise! Bad enough you know everyone that posts, maybe getting a life is in order

Anyway. . . . My OPINION, which forums are based on, not the abuse which you started, is that Kell Brook isn't a world level fighter, he is chinny and easy to hit as his upright style doesn't suit him, he simply won't beat any fighter at world level.

End topic. . . . And if I am wrong please come and tell me, but I think we will find who lacks knowledge

Ok mate. You don't seem to know what chinny means, but its fine.

Lol Stay tuned and you'll maybe learn something kid.

Anyway it's getting late you hop back into bed with your sister

Nice on gazza. You the man

Anyway it's getting late you hop back into bed with your sister [/quote]

]Nice on gazza. You the man [/quote]

Hey get in line

I thought that they meant the shots carried spite rather then thrown with spite. It's clear to see brook carries venom & is a strong lad. Brook didn't really look comftable till he scored the knockdown his nose & eye got reddend.
As for senchenko this tough 36 year old former world champ has anyone looked into who he has thought other then malinaggi??

Went to the show tonight and thought kel finished him well hit him with a good variety of shots.a little concerned when hi got caught with the right hand what stunned him but he recovered very quick and did what he had to do.needs to step up a level again to prepare for the big boys and if he prepares right he will get a world title as we can all see hes got the ability.the other good fight on the bill was the rose fight but I do think 2 judges got the decision wrong in that fight

gazza8 wrote:

DMA1987 wrote:

gazza8 wrote:
Likewise! Bad enough you know everyone that posts, maybe getting a life is in order

Anyway. . . . My OPINION, which forums are based on, not the abuse which you started, is that Kell Brook isn't a world level fighter, he is chinny and easy to hit as his upright style doesn't suit him, he simply won't beat any fighter at world level.

End topic. . . . And if I am wrong please come and tell me, but I think we will find who lacks knowledge

Ok mate. You don't seem to know what chinny means, but its fine.

Lol Stay tuned and you'll maybe learn something kid.

Anyway it's getting late you hop back into bed with your sister

Is this a Scottish tradition? My dad's from Scotland and puts salt in his porridge instead of sugar. He's a bitter, mean-spirited misanthrope as well. It's almost like Scotland's a foreign country or something.

Not a brook fan but a good win for him. The manner was excellent and good for him. I think a good fight for him is vs winner of Leonard bundu vs lee purdy for European title next. It's makes sense.