Page 2 of 2

Re: Larry Olubamiwo

Posted: 10 Nov 2013, 07:11
by palooka
clopixolacuphase wrote:I kinda like Larry, having spoken to him on here. I think he's OK. I don't like the cheating and the grassing, but I don't hate the guy. I wish him well.

It's like Chisora, who is a twat with a criminal record for beating women: I still really like and support the guy. For some bizarre reason he's one of my favorites. So if I like Chisora, I can't be all down on Larry can I?
I'm the same, there's not a perfect man in the world and there's a lot of skeletons behind some of the most sanctimonious people.

Re: Larry Olubamiwo

Posted: 10 Nov 2013, 08:26
by mickey1975
A man with his past shouldn't grass. He would be straight on the numbers if he did that a few years ago.

Re: Larry Olubamiwo

Posted: 10 Nov 2013, 08:28
by palooka
mickey1975 wrote:A man with his past shouldn't grass. He would be straight on the numbers if he did that a few years ago.
Rule 43?

Re: Larry Olubamiwo

Posted: 10 Nov 2013, 08:32
by mickey1975
palooka wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:A man with his past shouldn't grass. He would be straight on the numbers if he did that a few years ago.
Rule 43?
Yes.

Re: Larry Olubamiwo

Posted: 10 Nov 2013, 08:49
by thepocketrocket
I know Craig Windsor got the shaft, but who else did he rat?

Re: Larry Olubamiwo

Posted: 10 Nov 2013, 09:45
by housesecond
Should be a life ban for all drug cheats.

Re: Larry Olubamiwo

Posted: 10 Nov 2013, 16:45
by SAPFO
palooka wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:A man with his past shouldn't grass. He would be straight on the numbers if he did that a few years ago.
Rule 43?

45 now mate ;;-)

Re: Larry Olubamiwo

Posted: 10 Nov 2013, 17:14
by mickey1975
carlbcfc wrote:
palooka wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:A man with his past shouldn't grass. He would be straight on the numbers if he did that a few years ago.
Rule 43?

45 now mate ;;-)
Not done it since 95'. But f!ck him, there still numbers...

Re: Larry Olubamiwo

Posted: 10 Nov 2013, 17:54
by hurlock
He was openly taking roids & not even cutting of for detection purposes because he was never tested.i can see him using again & just making sure he tests clean .

I like larry as a person.he comes across like a gentleman imo.

Larry has brought lots to light, but I don't believe there's that big a problem if any in this country , but we are behind to the rest of the world

Re: Larry Olubamiwo

Posted: 10 Nov 2013, 20:51
by the truth
He's a cheat ! Should of been banned for life & his record wiped! Put other people's life's at risk all because he lacks confidence! Disgrace to boxing along with all the other cheats.

Re: Larry Olubamiwo

Posted: 11 Nov 2013, 00:50
by mickey1975
I don't even speak to people who have been on the numbers. It's for wrong uns and you would get done in even when you got out.

Re: Larry Olubamiwo

Posted: 11 Nov 2013, 08:26
by forcefraser
mickey1975 wrote:I don't even speak to people who have been on the numbers. It's for wrong uns and you would get done in even when you got out.
Can anyone be on the numbers or do you have to be a nonce, grass, police officer etc?

Re: Larry Olubamiwo

Posted: 11 Nov 2013, 10:09
by mickey1975
forcefraser wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:I don't even speak to people who have been on the numbers. It's for wrong uns and you would get done in even when you got out.
Can anyone be on the numbers or do you have to be a nonce, grass, police officer etc?
Anyone who asks to go on. They could be in debt on the wing or in danger of a good hiding.

Re: Larry Olubamiwo

Posted: 11 Nov 2013, 13:24
by lefty
Wtf is the numbers?! Is that just when you ask to be in protective custody or whatever it is?

Re: Larry Olubamiwo

Posted: 11 Nov 2013, 13:26
by palooka
columbo wrote:Wtf is the numbers?! Is that just when you ask to be in protective custody or whatever it is?
Stop playing dumb, your protection officer told you to act daft if this subject came up :OhYes:

Re: Larry Olubamiwo

Posted: 11 Nov 2013, 13:28
by lefty
palooka wrote:
columbo wrote:Wtf is the numbers?! Is that just when you ask to be in protective custody or whatever it is?
Stop playing dumb, your protection officer told you to act daft if this subject came up :OhYes:
:lol:

Re: Larry Olubamiwo

Posted: 11 Nov 2013, 13:55
by mickey1975
columbo wrote:Wtf is the numbers?! Is that just when you ask to be in protective custody or whatever it is?
You will find out, unfortunately, if you get imprisoned for asking too many questions online.

Re: Larry Olubamiwo

Posted: 11 Nov 2013, 14:00
by lefty
mickey1975 wrote:
columbo wrote:Wtf is the numbers?! Is that just when you ask to be in protective custody or whatever it is?
You will find out, unfortunately, if you get imprisoned for asking too many questions online.
Damn, life sentence coming up then ay.

Re: Larry Olubamiwo

Posted: 11 Nov 2013, 14:13
by palooka
columbo wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
columbo wrote:Wtf is the numbers?! Is that just when you ask to be in protective custody or whatever it is?
You will find out, unfortunately, if you get imprisoned for asking too many questions online.
Damn, life sentence coming up then ay.
:OhYes: with no parole

Re: Larry Olubamiwo

Posted: 11 Nov 2013, 14:31
by Cyclops
When I saw the "have you ever been caught masturbating by a family member?" thread in Off Topic I was shocked Columbo wasn't the OP

Re: Larry Olubamiwo

Posted: 12 Nov 2013, 03:10
by ra2006
Interesting comments!

I think the next time any of the nay sayers are driving and caught speeding, a crime proven to kill innocent people, they should be banned for life. No excuses. No way back. So what if they lose their jobs, family, homes etc. they made a mistake, they should pay the ultimate price for their temporary lapse in judgement!


Just saying!

Re: Larry Olubamiwo

Posted: 12 Nov 2013, 09:49
by jonp
ra2006 wrote:Interesting comments!

I think the next time any of the nay sayers are driving and caught speeding, a crime proven to kill innocent people, they should be banned for life. No excuses. No way back. So what if they lose their jobs, family, homes etc. they made a mistake, they should pay the ultimate price for their temporary lapse in judgement!


Just saying!
What about if theyv been speeding for six years none stop in an area wheres there more chance of a fatal accident?
If Larry had served his ban id have said give him a chance same as every one else he does seem a genuinly nice guy who had my full support before all this.its the fact that he did about a quarter of it and then helped with an investigation and got it slashed that grates for me.Will it encourage other people to cheat with PEDs and think well i can give a name and all is forgiven to stop drug cheats the penalties have to be harsh and not worht the risk.