Richard Dunn 'Was He Worthy of a Title Challenge'

Giancarlo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2316
Joined: 23 Feb 2011, 15:32

Re: Richard Dunn 'Was He Worthy of a Title Challenge'

Post by Giancarlo »

broonel wrote:
Ali just played with Dunne for a few rounds with no real intent it was left to Bugner who for once in his life came out swinging and showed Dunne he was out of his depth !
The build up was good too.

Dunne had foolishly suggested in front of the TV cameras that Bugner lacked courage and that at least he (Dunne) had actually tried to win rather than just going the distance.

This seemed to genuinely anger the normally placid Bugner and added an interesting 'edge' to what was already an eagerly anticipated showdown.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: Richard Dunn 'Was He Worthy of a Title Challenge'

Post by BoxBuzz »

Hey Il Duce....I found this....did you want it?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0Dk-94ovDs
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: Richard Dunn 'Was He Worthy of a Title Challenge'

Post by BoxBuzz »

Many times before?

Were there any "clues" as to more Ali "complications" or "deficits" revealed within that short bit of film?

I have been known to miss a few without having them pointed out to me.
yancey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2827
Joined: 16 Dec 2007, 18:26

Re: Richard Dunn 'Was He Worthy of a Title Challenge'

Post by yancey »

Il Duce wrote:Richard Dunn,

Gave 100% against Muhammad Ali.

He fought with his heart, and put in his best effort to win.

A former 'Paratrooper' as well.

Image
:TU: :TU: :TU:
broonel
Middleweight
Posts: 7
Joined: 13 Nov 2013, 10:20

Re: Richard Dunn 'Was He Worthy of a Title Challenge'

Post by broonel »

I never doubted Dunn s courage and most people would have agreed with his pre match comments on Bugner . Everyone knew Bugner was the better boxer , he did go 15 with Aii and Frazier (ok I don't think he hit either of them) but who else can say they did that ?
evrenb
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3410
Joined: 16 Feb 2013, 09:47

Re: Richard Dunn 'Was He Worthy of a Title Challenge'

Post by evrenb »

broonel wrote:I never doubted Dunn s courage and most people would have agreed with his pre match comments on Bugner . Everyone knew Bugner was the better boxer , he did go 15 with Aii and Frazier (ok I don't think he hit either of them) but who else can say they did that ?
Bugner shook Joe to his boots at Earls Court in 1973. It was a very good performance by Joe B.
Dunn was a good fighter with a not-so-great chin.

eb
broonel
Middleweight
Posts: 7
Joined: 13 Nov 2013, 10:20

Re: Richard Dunn 'Was He Worthy of a Title Challenge'

Post by broonel »

Ok ! my memory of the Joe B and Joe F fight is not great ( will have to watch it again ) but you know what I mean , Bugner could have gone much further !
yancey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2827
Joined: 16 Dec 2007, 18:26

Re: Richard Dunn 'Was He Worthy of a Title Challenge'

Post by yancey »

evrenb wrote:
broonel wrote:I never doubted Dunn s courage and most people would have agreed with his pre match comments on Bugner . Everyone knew Bugner was the better boxer , he did go 15 with Aii and Frazier (ok I don't think he hit either of them) but who else can say they did that ?
Bugner shook Joe to his boots at Earls Court in 1973. It was a very good performance by Joe B.
Dunn was a good fighter with a not-so-great chin.

eb
Before Bugner "shook Joe to his boots", Frazier had Bugner helpless in the corner in the 10th round with a big hook.

Bugner was doing some kind of Hungarian Two Step Twitch as he slowly fell.

If Frazier had a mind to, he could have ended things right then and there.

Too nice a guy was Joe + that joy of combat mentality had largely left him after he accomplished his real goal in '71.
evrenb
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3410
Joined: 16 Feb 2013, 09:47

Re: Richard Dunn 'Was He Worthy of a Title Challenge'

Post by evrenb »

yancey wrote:
evrenb wrote:
broonel wrote:I never doubted Dunn s courage and most people would have agreed with his pre match comments on Bugner . Everyone knew Bugner was the better boxer , he did go 15 with Aii and Frazier (ok I don't think he hit either of them) but who else can say they did that ?
Bugner shook Joe to his boots at Earls Court in 1973. It was a very good performance by Joe B.
Dunn was a good fighter with a not-so-great chin.

eb
Before Bugner "shook Joe to his boots", Frazier had Bugner helpless in the corner in the 10th round with a big hook.

Bugner was doing some kind of Hungarian Two Step Twitch as he slowly fell.

If Frazier had a mind to, he could have ended things right then and there.

Too nice a guy was Joe + that joy of combat mentality had largely left him after he accomplished his real goal in '71.
Yeah thats right. It was a decent fight and Bugner put up a good display. Frazier's chin was his weakest point and he didn't have many. . My third favourite fighter of all times.
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9183
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Richard Dunn 'Was He Worthy of a Title Challenge'

Post by Controversial »

yancey wrote:
Too nice a guy was Joe + that joy of combat mentality had largely left him after he accomplished his real goal in '71.
Its been said he lost something after Regis died early in his career, it affected Bugner quite bad.
evrenb
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3410
Joined: 16 Feb 2013, 09:47

Re: Richard Dunn 'Was He Worthy of a Title Challenge'

Post by evrenb »

Controversial wrote:
yancey wrote:
Too nice a guy was Joe + that joy of combat mentality had largely left him after he accomplished his real goal in '71.
Its been said he lost something after Regis died early in his career, it affected Bugner quite bad.
I think he meant Frazier???

Meaning 1971's defeat of Ali.
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9183
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Richard Dunn 'Was He Worthy of a Title Challenge'

Post by Controversial »

evrenb wrote:
Controversial wrote:
yancey wrote:
Too nice a guy was Joe + that joy of combat mentality had largely left him after he accomplished his real goal in '71.
Its been said he lost something after Regis died early in his career, it affected Bugner quite bad.
I think he meant Frazier???

Meaning 1971's defeat of Ali.
Oh yeah, I thought the "combat mentality" line was odd when talking about Bugner :-)
yancey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2827
Joined: 16 Dec 2007, 18:26

Re: Richard Dunn 'Was He Worthy of a Title Challenge'

Post by yancey »

evrenb wrote:
Controversial wrote:
yancey wrote:
Too nice a guy was Joe + that joy of combat mentality had largely left him after he accomplished his real goal in '71.
Its been said he lost something after Regis died early in his career, it affected Bugner quite bad.
I think he meant Frazier???

Meaning 1971's defeat of Ali.
Correct.
Bricks
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3916
Joined: 28 Apr 2008, 12:42

Re: Richard Dunn 'Was He Worthy of a Title Challenge'

Post by Bricks »

ThatOne wrote:
fatcity69 wrote:How much crap can one man write?? (is he a man???) the duchebag is still scribbling his(her) bilge here....

Maybe he likes showing his ass.
Trolls have ruined this board
Post Reply