BoxRec

expe wrote:

los2 wrote:

DMA1987 wrote:Is Frankie happy with this fight? There is almost no point.

some boxers are happy to keep their 0 and pick up a wage.....if its easy money why test themself...

Yep, for example, just like Kell Brook for the last 9 years.

senchenko had only lost his world title on a cut.....joseph numpty is rated 378 in world

DMA1987 wrote:

expe wrote:

los2 wrote:
some boxers are happy to keep their 0 and pick up a wage.....if its easy money why test themself...

Yep, for example, just like Kell Brook for the last 9 years.

Kell Brook who is mandatory for the IBF? I dont mind a weaker fight if there is a point. Thought none of Kells have been this.

Kotey was at a similar level to Lamptrey and Galarza was a step back as well. To be honest I only posted it because I knew it would get a reaction out of los2.

Not like you to cause trouble expe

With the reasons given it's fair enough to take this fight, but there has simply got to be a step up in levels next year. No more stagnation.

kotey was a bad match so brook left his promoter.....some boxers are happy picking up their money

kells been a pro over 9 years gavin less than 5 so see who kells fought in his 1st 5 years and compare that not what hes done the last few years

when i heard tickets for this show were thirty quid I thought about going with my dad, but if this is the match-making they aspire to I'll not bother. That is an xmas present for Frankie.

thatllbeme wrote:kells been a pro over 9 years gavin less than 5 so see who kells fought in his 1st 5 years and compare that not what hes done the last few years

gavin is older than brook....brook chose to learn the pro game not 3 rounders...imagine the stick brook would get if he'd had lottery funding and not gone to olympics

los2 wrote:

thatllbeme wrote:kells been a pro over 9 years gavin less than 5 so see who kells fought in his 1st 5 years and compare that not what hes done the last few years

gavin is older than brook....brook chose to learn the pro game not 3 rounders...imagine the stick brook would get if he'd had lottery funding and not gone to olympics

But if he would have won the World ams the good would probably outweigh the bad. Making history and all that..

los2 wrote:

thatllbeme wrote:kells been a pro over 9 years gavin less than 5 so see who kells fought in his 1st 5 years and compare that not what hes done the last few years

gavin is older than brook....brook chose to learn the pro game not 3 rounders...imagine the stick brook would get if he'd had lottery funding and not gone to olympics

It's incredible really that Amir Khan is the youngest out of Brook, Khan and Gavin; he's really done well.

mickey1975 wrote:

los2 wrote:

thatllbeme wrote:kells been a pro over 9 years gavin less than 5 so see who kells fought in his 1st 5 years and compare that not what hes done the last few years

gavin is older than brook....brook chose to learn the pro game not 3 rounders...imagine the stick brook would get if he'd had lottery funding and not gone to olympics

But if he would have won the World ams the good would probably outweigh the bad. Making history and all that..

amateur is a different game...none of those he beat in world ams even turned pro

palooka wrote:

los2 wrote:

thatllbeme wrote:kells been a pro over 9 years gavin less than 5 so see who kells fought in his 1st 5 years and compare that not what hes done the last few years

gavin is older than brook....brook chose to learn the pro game not 3 rounders...imagine the stick brook would get if he'd had lottery funding and not gone to olympics

It's incredible really that Amir Khan is the youngest out of Brook, Khan and Gavin; he's really done well.

Don't you dare say that on here. Your name will be mud. Troll.

gavin is older than brook....brook chose to learn the pro game not 3 rounders...imagine the stick brook would get if he'd had lottery funding and not gone to olympics[/quote]

It's incredible really that Amir Khan is the youngest out of Brook, Khan and Gavin; he's really done well.[/quote]

Don't you dare say that on here. Your name will be mud. Troll.[/quote]

I know, I'm on borrowed time

los2 wrote:

thatllbeme wrote:kells been a pro over 9 years gavin less than 5 so see who kells fought in his 1st 5 years and compare that not what hes done the last few years

gavin is older than brook....brook chose to learn the pro game not 3 rounders...imagine the stick brook would get if he'd had lottery funding and not gone to olympics

He did the best he could to make the Olympics, but couldn't make the weight, Kerry Kayes wasn't allowed out to Macau to help him and they wouldn't allow a box off at light welter because they wanted the extra fighter at the Olympics. Simply a case of the ABA and BOA thinking they knew best and had the best people in when they didn't and in doing so lost their best gold medal opportunity.