BoxRec

polecateddy wrote:Two fairly obvious observations. Froch would have stopped Groves had it gone on. It was a forgone conclusion. And at 36, the 36 year version of Calzaghe would have boxed his ears off for 12 rounds.

what are the lottery ticket numbers... ??

ajwesty13 wrote:

polecateddy wrote:Two fairly obvious observations. Froch would have stopped Groves had it gone on. It was a forgone conclusion. And at 36, the 36 year version of Calzaghe would have boxed his ears off for 12 rounds.

what are the lottery ticket numbers... ??

Here's a question for you..... who gave Groves the two black eyes? Coz the way you're talking, Froch never landed a glove on him

keithmoonhangover wrote:

ajwesty13 wrote:

polecateddy wrote:Two fairly obvious observations. Froch would have stopped Groves had it gone on. It was a forgone conclusion. And at 36, the 36 year version of Calzaghe would have boxed his ears off for 12 rounds.

what are the lottery ticket numbers... ??

Here's a question for you..... who gave Groves the two black eyes? Coz the way you're talking, Froch never landed a glove on him

George didnt looked buzzed for what i saw ... its boxing match he will get hit looked more like a punch on the nose that caused those two shinners and ps where did i say that froch didnt land a glove on him?

ajwesty13 wrote:George didnt looked buzzed for what i saw ... its boxing match he will get hit looked more like a punch on the nose that caused those two shinners and ps where did i say that froch didnt land a glove on him?

You didn't, it was just a turn of phrase.

keithmoonhangover wrote:

ajwesty13 wrote:George didnt looked buzzed for what i saw ... its boxing match he will get hit looked more like a punch on the nose that caused those two shinners and ps where did i say that froch didnt land a glove on him?

You didn't, it was just a turn of phrase.

I can understand your point and in my little disappoint of not getting a rematch i can tend to act a bit narrowminded but i do respect your opinion keith mate ... :)

ajwesty13 wrote:I can understand your point and in my little disappoint of not getting a rematch i can tend to act a bit narrowminded but i do respect your opinion keith mate ... :)

If you respect my opinion, you should read some more of my posts, that'll soon change your mind. ;;-)

keithmoonhangover wrote:

ajwesty13 wrote:I can understand your point and in my little disappoint of not getting a rematch i can tend to act a bit narrowminded but i do respect your opinion keith mate ... :)

If you respect my opinion, you should read some more of my posts, that'll soon change your mind. ;;-)

haha.. funny enough im just enjoying yours and horses little set to

ajwesty13 wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:

ajwesty13 wrote:I can understand your point and in my little disappoint of not getting a rematch i can tend to act a bit narrowminded but i do respect your opinion keith mate ... :)

If you respect my opinion, you should read some more of my posts, that'll soon change your mind. ;;-)

haha.. funny enough im just enjoying yours and horses little set to

He's a funny onion mate.

keithmoonhangover wrote:

ajwesty13 wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote: If you respect my opinion, you should read some more of my posts, that'll soon change your mind. ;;-)

haha.. funny enough im just enjoying yours and horses little set to

He's a funny onion mate.

haha yeah we all take turns sometimes times though lol

He can fight who he wants but in my eyes will be forever remembered as the guy that bottled a rematch with George Groves. I wont be paying to watch his next fight thats for sure.

The increasingly bullish Keith Moon chap was so convinced Froch would rematch Groves he was prepared to bet a grand on it.

Evidently Froch said it in the post fight interview merely to attempt to stop the crowd's chorus of boos.

I can hear a lot of beeping. There must be some reversing going on.

This is cringeworthy.

'Groves did a proper demolition job on Froch' Behave.

Froch/Groves has seemingly brought out the effing moron in a fair few people on here it seems.

'Froch will always be remembered as the man who didnt rematch Groves'

I want the rematch, but I'm not about to go on hunger strike until its made.

keithmoonhangover wrote:

ajwesty13 wrote:

polecateddy wrote:Two fairly obvious observations. Froch would have stopped Groves had it gone on. It was a forgone conclusion. And at 36, the 36 year version of Calzaghe would have boxed his ears off for 12 rounds.

what are the lottery ticket numbers... ??

Here's a question for you..... who gave Groves the two black eyes? Coz the way you're talking, Froch never landed a glove on him

Probaby Frochs snout inflicting the damage there.

As soon as he opened his mouth post fight and started spewing manure I knew he was going to bottle it, every interview he has given since has stregnthened that opinion.

Like many I have lost a huge amount of respect for him. He owes Groves a rematch, most fighters with real pride would grant it in a heartbeat.... but not Carl 'The Worrier' Froch.

Lets sit back and listen to him continue to harp on about the Ward rematch, a fight that if it happens he will do well to land a glove on his oponent, never mind win a round!

ShadrachSimmo wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote: Here's a question for you..... who gave Groves the two black eyes? Coz the way you're talking, Froch never landed a glove on him

Probaby Frochs snout inflicting the damage there.

and those shots he landed on the breaks.

The Froch Vs Groves fight, along with Bradley Vs Provodnikov was the best fight I've seen this year. Boxing is a very tough sport, getting punched in the head for a living is tough way to make a living.

If Froch has the chance to fight Jr in the US he should take it. Much lower risk, high reward. As a boxing fan ofcourse I want to see the Groves re-match, but I'm not getting punched in the face for others' entertainment. I've never ever put a pair of gloves on let alone stepped in a ring, so I would never question anyone's heart or bottle and it's ridiculous to question Froch's.

And on the subject of Bradley Vs Provodnikov - no-one's calling Bradley a pussy or such like for not re-matching.He took a terrible beating and escaped with a controversial win. What's the difference?

quote="deadpan"]The increasingly bullish Keith Moon chap was so convinced Froch would rematch Groves he was prepared to bet a grand on it.

Evidently Froch said it in the post fight interview merely to attempt to stop the crowd's chorus of boos.

I can hear a lot of beeping. There must be some reversing going on.[/quote]

it'a all just talk from Froch at the moment, no fights are booked. I'm still convinced there will be a rematch.

I've never been called a bullish chap before.

Newport Daz wrote:The Froch Vs Groves fight, along with Bradley Vs Provodnikov was the best fight I've seen this year. Boxing is a very tough sport, getting punched in the head for a living is tough way to make a living.

If Froch has the chance to fight Jr in the US he should take it. Much lower risk, high reward. As a boxing fan ofcourse I want to see the Groves re-match, but I'm not getting punched in the face for others' entertainment. I've never ever put a pair of gloves on let alone stepped in a ring, so I would never question anyone's heart or bottle and it's ridiculous to question Froch's.

And on the subject of Bradley Vs Provodnikov - no-one's calling Bradley a pussy or such like for not re-matching.He took a terrible beating and escaped with a controversial win. What's the difference?

Well said Daz. Nowt the matter with a fight before the rematch.

after the way the "fans" have turned on carl [particularly in light of all the great nights hes given us] I cant blame him for looking after number 1. You only have to read some of the ridiculous posts about this fight to realise boxing is a fickle, cruel sport, so why not try and get as much out of it as u can for u and your family and fornicate the "fans" that judge and criticise through half pissed eyes from the comfort of their living room. The turncoats will still fall over themselves to buy him a drink and pat him on the back when hes retired anyway, such is their fickle nature.

Thing is, what did carl ACTUALLY do to deserve all this bile? Come from behind [showing heart and resolve beyond the call of duty] and stop a young hungry dangerous challenger that was giving him fits. OMG what a crime, revoke his licence.

He should fight chavez and then say "see ya, Im off to bounce Rachel off the walls for the rest of my life."

Lets just chuck the biggest fight in British boxing out the window because the 'International Superstar' has lost his bottle. Its a shame but at least we have Joshua and co knocking over journeyman and Quigg defending his 'World title' to look forward too.

BLASTER100 wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:It ain't Froch's fault the ref stopped the fight. If he gets offered a fight with Ward or Chavez and takes it, that's his prerogative - it's his career after all.

It is his prerogative. And it ours to call him a dodging Worrier.

But, I think Groves hurts him bad next time, so no rematch.

Dodging.....!!!

Kessler, Ward, Abraham, Taylor, Bute......enough said.

Newport Daz wrote:The Froch Vs Groves fight, along with Bradley Vs Provodnikov was the best fight I've seen this year. Boxing is a very tough sport, getting punched in the head for a living is tough way to make a living.

If Froch has the chance to fight Jr in the US he should take it. Much lower risk, high reward. As a boxing fan ofcourse I want to see the Groves re-match, but I'm not getting punched in the face for others' entertainment. I've never ever put a pair of gloves on let alone stepped in a ring, so I would never question anyone's heart or bottle and it's ridiculous to question Froch's.

And on the subject of Bradley Vs Provodnikov - no-one's calling Bradley a pussy or such like for not re-matching.He took a terrible beating and escaped with a controversial win. What's the difference?

Thankyou - sanity is restored.

keithmoonhangover wrote:

ajwesty13 wrote:

polecateddy wrote:Two fairly obvious observations. Froch would have stopped Groves had it gone on. It was a forgone conclusion. And at 36, the 36 year version of Calzaghe would have boxed his ears off for 12 rounds.

what are the lottery ticket numbers... ??

Here's a question for you..... who gave Groves the two black eyes? Coz the way you're talking, Froch never landed a glove on him

It's infuriating, people are acting like Carl didn't land a shot before the ninth, as early as the sixth, Groves had a swelling coming up under his left eye.

Just because Watt chose to just talk over everything Carl did in the first 7 rounds, doesn't mean the punches didn't land.


"He's just paaawwwwwwwwin' wi' the jab...."
"Groves is tooooo quuuck, and tooooo clever"

Etc etc etc.

lillywhite14 wrote:This is cringeworthy.

'Groves did a proper demolition job on Froch' Behave.

Froch/Groves has seemingly brought out the effing moron in a fair few people on here it seems.

'Froch will always be remembered as the man who didnt rematch Groves'

I want the rematch, but I'm not about to go on hunger strike until its made.

Yup, it seems people want to go to extreme's. Though one thing Yiddo, I could probably do with going on hunger strike.....shift a few more pounds

Am I alone in sensing that the banned Groove Armada is this BLASTER100? Well, he appears to have been banned too. Oh well, off to me mum's for some erm......low cal, diet type food....NOT!

Anyone think Groves will target one of the other top guys at the weight?

I can see him sitting on his 'moral victory' and biding his time.

I'm not completely sold on him. I think he could unravel again at the top level.