Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

Post by palooka »

expe wrote:
ajwesty13 wrote:
expe wrote:Should just mix it up more. Use everyone available, rather than just Watt.
yeah i agree i do like jim thou... the trouble is atm if you havent got jim then you got mcrory that upsets me
Paul Smith's an option, there's Duke McKenzie and various other options. Variety is the spice of life and all that poo.



Leave your sordid sex life out of it
ajwesty13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

Post by ajwesty13 »

expe wrote:
ajwesty13 wrote:
expe wrote:Should just mix it up more. Use everyone available, rather than just Watt.
yeah i agree i do like jim thou... the trouble is atm if you havent got jim then you got mcrory that upsets me
Paul Smith's an option, there's Duke McKenzie and various other options. Variety is the spice of life and all that poo.
yeah paul always done a good job when ever he has been a pundit.. actually bomber would be a great edition to
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16935
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

Post by keithmoonhangover »

palooka wrote:I'd like to see Johnny Nelson at the bouts and commentating, Jon Thaxton was good as well I've seen him before.

Thanks for the shout Keith but I blush and sweat awful whenever I'm in public under scrutiny, it's socially restrictive :(
Oh dear. :oops:
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

Post by palooka »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
palooka wrote:I'd like to see Johnny Nelson at the bouts and commentating, Jon Thaxton was good as well I've seen him before.

Thanks for the shout Keith but I blush and sweat awful whenever I'm in public under scrutiny, it's socially restrictive :(
Oh dear. :oops:
Yeah, I've got a really red face and spots on my chest and loads of curly hair, I like to wear shiny trousers as well :wink:
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16935
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

Post by keithmoonhangover »

palooka wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
palooka wrote:I'd like to see Johnny Nelson at the bouts and commentating, Jon Thaxton was good as well I've seen him before.

Thanks for the shout Keith but I blush and sweat awful whenever I'm in public under scrutiny, it's socially restrictive :(
Oh dear. :oops:
Yeah, I've got a really red face and spots on my chest and loads of curly hair, I like to wear shiny trousers as well :wink:
That just turned my stomach. Stop it or I'm putting you on ignore. :shame:
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

Post by hurlock »

palooka wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
palooka wrote:I'd like to see Johnny Nelson at the bouts and commentating, Jon Thaxton was good as well I've seen him before.

Thanks for the shout Keith but I blush and sweat awful whenever I'm in public under scrutiny, it's socially restrictive :(
Oh dear. :oops:
Yeah, I've got a really red face and spots on my chest and loads of curly hair, I like to wear shiny trousers as well :wink:
Do you hang rugs in your wall while vigorously rub finger & thumb together??
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

Post by palooka »

Yeah, I've got a really red face and spots on my chest and loads of curly hair, I like to wear shiny trousers as well :wink:[/quote]

Do you hang rugs in your wall while vigorously rub finger & thumb together??[/quote]

Stop looking through my window, no matter what I'm doing you're worse for peeping
stevek3lly
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 649
Joined: 14 Jul 2010, 14:56

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

Post by stevek3lly »

Always like hearing Jamie Moore. But if Watt were to go then I would like someone new, I remember Jon Thaxton doing it once and he was really good, strange shout but he did a good job and he is a nice guy.
Teddy's Toupee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2903
Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

Post by Teddy's Toupee »

That "thumb" is, in fact, palooka's penis being vigorously "rubbed". I know because I'm tied to a chair in his front room with palooka stood in front of me. Save me hurlock, it's like a horrific flashback to my time at private school.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

Post by palooka »

XXX logged off XXX
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26425
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

Post by banjo »

I wouldn't, I love his commentary

"Arrrrum Puncheeeeessss"

"Fucken' BANG on the chen"

"Tortally"

"Tekken chanceeeeessse"

"noansense from the refereeeee"

"tryin' to be too cute"
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

Post by palooka »

banjo wrote:I wouldn't, I love his commentary

"Arrrrum Puncheeeeessss"

"Fucken' BANG on the chen"

"Tortally"

"Tekken chanceeeeessse"

"noansense from the refereeeee"

"tryin' to be too cute"
Thought I'd logged off
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

Post by Finn »

I like Jim Watt. Whats the point of someone telling me what i already know i like to be able to shout at the commentators when i disagree.
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

Post by Spud »

keithmoonhangover wrote:I think Haye would do a very good job. *PREPARES HIMSELF FOR A LOAD OF ABUSE*
I agree!! :TU:

But away too often to have a regular slot.
daviddee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1574
Joined: 01 Feb 2012, 14:32

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

Post by daviddee »

Did anyone hear Alex Arthur's commentary last night. He was really good would prefer him on the shows. Well done Sky highlight of your shows
Bennyblanco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 967
Joined: 19 Jul 2009, 05:01

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

Post by Bennyblanco »

Anyone, he's terrible.
Lenny Cravats
Super Middleweight
Posts: 8024
Joined: 23 Feb 2013, 10:43

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

Post by Lenny Cravats »

Glen Catley.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4733
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

Looks like Arthur's the new Watt.

Extensive use of the word "tremendous" has assured him the job.

I personally like Arthur's analysis/commentary.
WayoftheCass
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 719
Joined: 09 Oct 2005, 02:22

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

Post by WayoftheCass »

Jim's usually garbage but last night he was awful. Criticized Barker for being too offensive."Trying to do it the macho way!" He's fighting a home fighter in Germany FFS Jim!!! :roll:

Also dismissed Geale like Strum just had an off night. Aye.....like he did against Soliman, Murray and Macklin to???

Was making out like Strum had come out like a man possessed. Strum fought the same he always fights for me. Unfortunately Darren's punch resistance seems to have been sapped by the war with Geale.

Then when it's over he gives it "Maybe Darren thought he had to be aggressive in order to win abroad....."

Thanks for finally realizing that Jim. I knew it would come to you eventually. :bag:
WayoftheCass
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 719
Joined: 09 Oct 2005, 02:22

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

Post by WayoftheCass »

daviddee wrote:Did anyone hear Alex Arthur's commentary last night. He was really good would prefer him on the shows. Well done Sky highlight of your shows

Always was well spoken and quite analytic after his own performances. By all accounts he's quite a nice, down to earth and intelligent guy in real life. Hope he gets the gig full time. :TU:
Jeff Thomas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3016
Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

Post by Jeff Thomas »

Alex Arthur....

His technical understanding is brilliant.

And he's a nice chap with an optimistic outlook - that's what you want to hear.
Matt Teague
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 318
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:19

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

Post by Matt Teague »

Ian Darke, Jamie Moore, Paul smith,

Would be my choice, I've always thought Jim watt ruins fights with his commentary
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

Post by stujones »

WayoftheCass wrote:Jim's usually garbage but last night he was awful. Criticized Barker for being too offensive."Trying to do it the macho way!" He's fighting a home fighter in Germany FFS Jim!!! :roll:

Also dismissed Geale like Strum just had an off night. Aye.....like he did against Soliman, Murray and Macklin to???

Was making out like Strum had come out like a man possessed. Strum fought the same he always fights for me. Unfortunately Darren's punch resistance seems to have been sapped by the war with Geale.

Then when it's over he gives it "Maybe Darren thought he had to be aggressive in order to win abroad....."

Thanks for finally realizing that Jim. I knew it would come to you eventually. :bag:
Barker just got kod in two horrible rounds.....This has never happened before, Barker clearly fought the wrong fight tactically....surely Watt was proven correct and quickly also.

Part of barker's team said he fought the wrong way...now maybe Watt had knowledge of this beforehand and knew barker wasn't fighting per instructions.

Too suggest barkers punch resistance is disminishing is a bit much....the guy couldn't move. It's a bit like saying Nicky cook's punch resistance has gone for the burns fight. Barker wasn't badly hurt in the second at all IMO....he simply couldn't move.....strum in essence was hitting a heavy bag.
WayoftheCass
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 719
Joined: 09 Oct 2005, 02:22

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

Post by WayoftheCass »

stujones wrote:
WayoftheCass wrote:Jim's usually garbage but last night he was awful. Criticized Barker for being too offensive."Trying to do it the macho way!" He's fighting a home fighter in Germany FFS Jim!!! :roll:

Also dismissed Geale like Strum just had an off night. Aye.....like he did against Soliman, Murray and Macklin to???

Was making out like Strum had come out like a man possessed. Strum fought the same he always fights for me. Unfortunately Darren's punch resistance seems to have been sapped by the war with Geale.

Then when it's over he gives it "Maybe Darren thought he had to be aggressive in order to win abroad....."

Thanks for finally realizing that Jim. I knew it would come to you eventually. :bag:
Barker just got kod in two horrible rounds.....This has never happened before, Barker clearly fought the wrong fight tactically....surely Watt was proven correct and quickly also.

Part of barker's team said he fought the wrong way...now maybe Watt had knowledge of this beforehand and knew barker wasn't fighting per instructions.

Too suggest barkers punch resistance is disminishing is a bit much....the guy couldn't move. It's a bit like saying Nicky cook's punch resistance has gone for the burns fight. Barker wasn't badly hurt in the second at all IMO....he simply couldn't move.....strum in essence was hitting a heavy bag.
He went down twice from decent but no more shots. I can buy that argument if he was taking shots and got stopped on his feet as he couldn't move but he got decked twice and it was only after the second KD he signaled an issue with the hip and started limping.
Comparing it with the Cook fight is a non starter. Cook was showing distress form the first bell and could hardly stand up. Barker was competitive and was trading until he got decked so the heavy bag comparison I don't get.

Also the tactics were not all wrong. Strum isn't a puncher. He has a high work rate and wins the vast majority of his fights on points. So Barker getting on the back foot and trying to outbox him would be a waste of time. It would be Strum by UD all day long. The only way you win in Germany against a locally based fighter is by outfighting them and getting the benefit of the doubt on the cards or by KO. I think that's been long well established. That aside Watt's general commentary is dreadful as most people seem to have stated. It frustrates me as it does many others and he's getting money for old rope.

I like Darren. Was delighted by his win against Geale. But if your getting taken out by shots like that against a puncher of Strum's level then against big hitters then I fear for Darren and hope he doesn't throw the dice again.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Who Would You Replace Jim Watt With?

Post by stujones »

Barker was complaining about his injury to his corner at the end of the first round.

For me, and I don't want to Sturm a disservice, the shots that "wobbled" Barker only did so cause Barker couldn't move properly....weren't wobbles as such just you would be walking funny if you've dislocated your hip. The man was on the floor after the second kd pointing and telling his corner his hip has gone. Not the signs of a person who is so distressed by the punches he doesn't know what planet he is on.

Maybe punch bag wasn't an accurate analogy....but the man couldn't move properly...he was a far easier target to Sturm than strum was too him.

Think David haye, sam soliman and Daniel Geale (vs sylvester) showed you can win big fights on back foot in Getmany.

Re Watt it's getting to a stage were I am anticipated a slag him off thread before the fight starts....now he is getting slagged off for criticising a fighter who lost in 2 rounds and praising a fighter for his first stoppage win in a million years. :roll:

Not sure he's given a fair crack with some posters these days.....

Re the thread though....if sky did decide to drop Watt....hope they don't......they could do a lot worse than poach Barry Jones from allegedly. Don't agree with his cards sometimes though.
Post Reply