BoxRec

Thurman would spank brook. Only world champ brook beats around that weight is porter

I think that Thurman would be caught the same as Porter if he fought Kell - all good fights and tests for all of them.

As for opponents think they are all evenly matched Senchenko and Soto-Karass mixed in good level opponents.

Maidana would be a good match up as he seems to have improved under Robert Garcia.

bigB wrote:I think that Thurman would be caught the same as Porter if he fought Kell - all good fights and tests for all of them.

As for opponents think they are all evenly matched Senchenko and Soto-Karass mixed in good level opponents.

Maidana would be a good match up as he seems to have improved under Robert Garcia.

Do you think Guerrero would be a good match up for either Brook or Thurman? Or too much of a risk? If either could beat him, it would be the biggest name on their record and would be a big step forward in proving their class. Again, only hypothetical as Brook is of course mandatory for Porter.

danamba7 wrote:

bigB wrote:I think that Thurman would be caught the same as Porter if he fought Kell - all good fights and tests for all of them.

As for opponents think they are all evenly matched Senchenko and Soto-Karass mixed in good level opponents.

Maidana would be a good match up as he seems to have improved under Robert Garcia.

Do you think Guerrero would be a good match up for either Brook or Thurman? Or too much of a risk? If either could beat him, it would be the biggest name on their record and would be a big step forward in proving their class. Again, only hypothetical as Brook is of course mandatory for Porter.

He would be a huge risk same as a Berto or Ortiz aswell. But we as the fans want to see them fights. Think Kell may have a tune up fight in March if they fight is made for June with Porter if Alexander takes the rematch.

Its a good fight down the road that's it really.
You could argue Thurman has demonstrated more power but level of opposition is questionable as can be argued the case for Kell at this stage.......(its called balance columbo and Horse take note)
I believe Kell has superior movement and with the right game plan wins easily on points.
I don't say Kell would knock him out as Thurman has never been ko'd and his chin has held up thus far....it would surely be ridiculous to suggest it.

IF YOU DONT RATE KELL OR DISLIKE HIM IT WOULD BE FAR BETTER TO JUST ADMIT IT RATHER THAN MAKE DIGS THEN DENY ANY ILL FEELING.
ALL THIS BROOK IS WANK BROOK SHIT OUT FROM 2 WORLD TITLE SHOTS BUT I DONT DISLIKE HIM I THINK HE'S GREAT BUT WILL TAKE EVERY OPPURTUNITY TO C.U.N.T HIM OFF IN THREADS GET AN ARSEHOLE AND SPEAK YOUR FU.CKING MIND.

TJ77 wrote:Its a good fight down the road that's it really.
You could argue Thurman has demonstrated more power but level of opposition is questionable as can be argued the case for Kell at this stage.......(its called balance columbo and Horse take note)
I believe Kell has superior movement and with the right game plan wins easily on points.
I don't say Kell would knock him out as Thurman has never been ko'd and his chin has held up thus far....it would surely be ridiculous to suggest it.

IF YOU DONT RATE KELL OR DISLIKE HIM IT WOULD BE FAR BETTER TO JUST ADMIT IT RATHER THAN MAKE DIGS THEN DENY ANY ILL FEELING.
ALL THIS BROOK IS WANK BROOK poo OUT FROM 2 WORLD TITLE SHOTS BUT I DONT DISLIKE HIM I THINK HE'S GREAT BUT WILL TAKE EVERY OPPURTUNITY TO C.U.N.T HIM OFF IN THREADS GET AN ARSEHOLE AND SPEAK YOUR FU.CKING MIND.

Yawn.

TJ77 wrote:Its a good fight down the road that's it really.
You could argue Thurman has demonstrated more power but level of opposition is questionable as can be argued the case for Kell at this stage.......(its called balance columbo and Horse take note)
I believe Kell has superior movement and with the right game plan wins easily on points.
I don't say Kell would knock him out as Thurman has never been ko'd and his chin has held up thus far....it would surely be ridiculous to suggest it.

IF YOU DONT RATE KELL OR DISLIKE HIM IT WOULD BE FAR BETTER TO JUST ADMIT IT RATHER THAN MAKE DIGS THEN DENY ANY ILL FEELING.
ALL THIS BROOK IS WANK BROOK poo OUT FROM 2 WORLD TITLE SHOTS BUT I DONT DISLIKE HIM I THINK HE'S GREAT BUT WILL TAKE EVERY OPPURTUNITY TO C.U.N.T HIM OFF IN THREADS GET AN ARSEHOLE AND SPEAK YOUR FU.CKING MIND.

Thurman took a cracking shot in his last fight and handled it well.

.

forcefraser wrote:

TJ77 wrote:Its a good fight down the road that's it really.
You could argue Thurman has demonstrated more power but level of opposition is questionable as can be argued the case for Kell at this stage.......(its called balance columbo and Horse take note)
I believe Kell has superior movement and with the right game plan wins easily on points.
I don't say Kell would knock him out as Thurman has never been ko'd and his chin has held up thus far....it would surely be ridiculous to suggest it.

IF YOU DONT RATE KELL OR DISLIKE HIM IT WOULD BE FAR BETTER TO JUST ADMIT IT RATHER THAN MAKE DIGS THEN DENY ANY ILL FEELING.
ALL THIS BROOK IS WANK BROOK poo OUT FROM 2 WORLD TITLE SHOTS BUT I DONT DISLIKE HIM I THINK HE'S GREAT BUT WILL TAKE EVERY OPPURTUNITY TO C.U.N.T HIM OFF IN THREADS GET AN ARSEHOLE AND SPEAK YOUR FU.CKING MIND.

Thurman took a cracking shot in his last fight and handled it well.

Agreed and against Chaves he took several heavy shots and came through he has good power too.
All im saying is Kell has taken heavy shots and never lost either that's all .

TJ77 wrote:

columbo wrote:

TJ77 wrote:Its a good fight down the road that's it really.
You could argue Thurman has demonstrated more power but level of opposition is questionable as can be argued the case for Kell at this stage.......(its called balance columbo and Horse take note)
I believe Kell has superior movement and with the right game plan wins easily on points.
I don't say Kell would knock him out as Thurman has never been ko'd and his chin has held up thus far....it would surely be ridiculous to suggest it.

IF YOU DONT RATE KELL OR DISLIKE HIM IT WOULD BE FAR BETTER TO JUST ADMIT IT RATHER THAN MAKE DIGS THEN DENY ANY ILL FEELING.
ALL THIS BROOK IS WANK BROOK poo OUT FROM 2 WORLD TITLE SHOTS BUT I DONT DISLIKE HIM I THINK HE'S GREAT BUT WILL TAKE EVERY OPPURTUNITY TO C.U.N.T HIM OFF IN THREADS GET AN ARSEHOLE AND SPEAK YOUR FU.CKING MIND.

Yawn.

Yawn your fu,cking self you practically live on here waiting for the chance to spit bile on Kell then say your a fan its f.ucking boring theres no balance to your argument your a troll without the bollocks to admit your real viewpoint.
You have amassed a ridiculous amount of posts in little over a year and the vast majority is complete twaddle biased back bone less bollocks.
From the toe curling cock sucking you did to Carson Jones trainer to the rimming you give Curtis every time he posts its painfull to witness please man up or follow netball or something.

My number of posts has nothing to do with you. As for me not having the backbone to criticise Kell, well considering you've just criticised me for doing exactly that, that makes no fornicating sense. What ive said and ive always said is that Kell has talent but has fought piss poor competition which a lot of other people also think. As for me rimming Curtis, well when you get off Kell's nutsack then il think about it

TJ77 wrote:Its a good fight down the road that's it really.
You could argue Thurman has demonstrated more power but level of opposition is questionable as can be argued the case for Kell at this stage.......(its called balance columbo and Horse take note)
I believe Kell has superior movement and with the right game plan wins easily on points.
I don't say Kell would knock him out as Thurman has never been ko'd and his chin has held up thus far....it would surely be ridiculous to suggest it.

IF YOU DONT RATE KELL OR DISLIKE HIM IT WOULD BE FAR BETTER TO JUST ADMIT IT RATHER THAN MAKE DIGS THEN DENY ANY ILL FEELING.
ALL THIS BROOK IS WANK BROOK poo OUT FROM 2 WORLD TITLE SHOTS BUT I DONT DISLIKE HIM I THINK HE'S GREAT BUT WILL TAKE EVERY OPPURTUNITY TO C.U.N.T HIM OFF IN THREADS GET AN ARSEHOLE AND SPEAK YOUR FU.CKING MIND.

So basically everyone has to rim Brook like you, otherwise you're not happy? Can you not accept that people don't think he's world class and has fought poor opposition?

expe wrote:

TJ77 wrote:Its a good fight down the road that's it really.
You could argue Thurman has demonstrated more power but level of opposition is questionable as can be argued the case for Kell at this stage.......(its called balance columbo and Horse take note)
I believe Kell has superior movement and with the right game plan wins easily on points.
I don't say Kell would knock him out as Thurman has never been ko'd and his chin has held up thus far....it would surely be ridiculous to suggest it.

IF YOU DONT RATE KELL OR DISLIKE HIM IT WOULD BE FAR BETTER TO JUST ADMIT IT RATHER THAN MAKE DIGS THEN DENY ANY ILL FEELING.
ALL THIS BROOK IS WANK BROOK poo OUT FROM 2 WORLD TITLE SHOTS BUT I DONT DISLIKE HIM I THINK HE'S GREAT BUT WILL TAKE EVERY OPPURTUNITY TO C.U.N.T HIM OFF IN THREADS GET AN ARSEHOLE AND SPEAK YOUR FU.CKING MIND.

So basically everyone has to rim Brook like you, otherwise you're not happy? Can you not accept that people don't think he's world class and has fought poor opposition?

No if you dont like anyone better you say it stick to it and explain it.Not pretend to be undecided on him admit he has talent but has fought shit opposition then use EVERY opportunity to blame him for set backs and ridicule the lad.
We have had the chat where you accept nothing than your conspiracy theories as fact and my facts as fiction it goes in circles got boring along time ago.

I was overly harsh columbo and a bit personal and I apologise.

TJ77 wrote:I was overly harsh columbo and a bit personal and I apologise.

Fairplay mate. I accept your apology. I can honestly say ive never thought Kell was a bad fight, I actually like his counter punching style. It's just the level of competition up to now has frustrated me. Perhaps it hasnt been Kell's fault in that regard and ive been harsh myself. Either way, fairplay

I'd pick Thurman over Brook and Maidana personally. But there we go. I also picked Barker over Sturm, and that went tits.

It's a tough division that Kell is in. If Porter is the easy option, then it must be a tough division. Porter is a high-quality operator as he proved over Aleksander.

I would take Brook to beat him actually, but it would be a close one.

columbo wrote:

TJ77 wrote:I was overly harsh columbo and a bit personal and I apologise.

Fairplay mate. I accept your apology. I can honestly say ive never thought Kell was a bad fight, I actually like his counter punching style. It's just the level of competition up to now has frustrated me. Perhaps it hasnt been Kell's fault in that regard and ive been harsh myself. Either way, fairplay

Nice one fella I have been having a particularly shit couple of days at work.
I am as frustrated as anyone he really needs to prove it either way so I can either sit back and laugh my cock off.
Or change my screen name and join the haters.
I can be a dick sometimes why I choose to do it on line and embarrass myself is something I will figure out with the help of the nursing staff here at the secure unit.

TJ77 wrote:

columbo wrote:

TJ77 wrote:I was overly harsh columbo and a bit personal and I apologise.

Fairplay mate. I accept your apology. I can honestly say ive never thought Kell was a bad fight, I actually like his counter punching style. It's just the level of competition up to now has frustrated me. Perhaps it hasnt been Kell's fault in that regard and ive been harsh myself. Either way, fairplay

Nice one fella I have been having a particularly poo couple of days at work.
I am as frustrated as anyone he really needs to prove it either way so I can either sit back and laugh my cock off.
Or change my screen name and join the haters.
I can be a dick sometimes why I choose to do it on line and embarrass myself is something I will figure out with the help of the nursing staff here at the secure unit.

Haha. Well it takes a bigger man to say sorry when it's easy not to so I do appreciate that. Dont worry, you can laugh your ass of at me and others like me who have criticised Kell when he has success lol. To be fair, the welterweight division is a highly competitive division and there's a lot of really fun fights to made there! A loss in that division isnt the end of the world. Taking Kell out of the equation, im a boxing fan who would respect a guy more who's had 10 losses or something and they were against the best guys vs a guy who has never fought the top competition but has a pretty unblemished record. If that makes sense? I and I guess most of us fans want to see the best fights really!