Page 2 of 2

Re: Mundine hypothetical

Posted: 30 Jan 2014, 02:46
by caveman
only fight i reckon that was ok was the casey-quinlan fight,and that wasnt worth ppv,another one looked ok but was a lot of slappin, how can u put a 46 year old against 21 year old, plus 1 W 13 L against 9 with no loss, and quad cooper fought a midget, and call it a ppv card, the card was ridiculous as mundine cards always r

Re: Mundine hypothetical

Posted: 30 Jan 2014, 02:58
by AntonS
Each to his own opinion. I reckon it was one of the better cards since I can remember.

Re: Mundine hypothetical

Posted: 30 Jan 2014, 20:06
by dan h
Better compared to what?

1. Better than Normal $50 PPV Cards?
2. Better than normal Mundine PPV cards? or
3. Better than recent Australian domestic cards (aired free on TV),

Re: Mundine hypothetical

Posted: 30 Jan 2014, 20:37
by AntonS
dan h wrote:Better compared to what?

1. Better than Normal $50 PPV Cards?
2. Better than normal Mundine PPV cards? or
3. Better than recent Australian domestic cards (aired free on TV),

Re: Mundine hypothetical

Posted: 30 Jan 2014, 21:36
by Hounddawg
fox wrote:Yeah the fights were one sided but wasn't that bad of night. See a lot of worse shows that's for sure. With a couple of opponent changes it really wasn't that bad. We can all see Choc is not going to match it with the top dogs, but seriously who in Australia will. He is still one of the best we have got. Lets hope Alex can land with clean and bring the Heavyweight Title home. Even the ugly fights on paper didn't turn out too bad last night.

Geale, Soliman can match it with the best, and have already proved it? a few young blokes comn through are going to put us in the spotlight mate...Horn, McCulloch, Hooper, Caperello Carr and Brown.

We also have Leapai on a wing and a pray for the Heavyweight title...don't understand the comment...Mundine could match it, but he'll never know

Re: Mundine hypothetical

Posted: 30 Jan 2014, 21:41
by Hounddawg
caveman wrote:only fight i reckon that was ok was the casey-quinlan fight,and that wasnt worth ppv,another one looked ok but was a lot of slappin, how can u put a 46 year old against 21 year old, plus 1 W 13 L against 9 with no loss, and quad cooper fought a midget, and call it a ppv card, the card was ridiculous as mundine cards always r

Agree mate. I didnt watch but on paper, the worse card I've seen on PPV.

Side note, Is Shane ever returning to the ring

Re: Mundine hypothetical

Posted: 30 Jan 2014, 21:43
by Hounddawg
AntonS wrote:
dan h wrote:Better compared to what?

1. Better than Normal $50 PPV Cards?
2. Better than normal Mundine PPV cards? or
3. Better than recent Australian domestic cards (aired free on TV),
Mundine has produced at least 2 very very decent scraps on his under cards.

Leapai v Walker
Sam vs Aloua

That is all

Re: Mundine hypothetical

Posted: 31 Jan 2014, 00:55
by amwsnw
"Geale, Soliman can match it with the best, and have already proved it? a few young blokes comn through are going to put us in the spotlight mate...Horn, McCulloch, Hooper, Caperello Carr and Brown.

We also have Leapai on a wing and a pray for the Heavyweight title...don't understand the comment...Mundine could match it, but he'll never know"

And don't forget Jarrod Fletcher. who this weekend travels across the world to take a very formidable opponent. And if he wins may leap frog guys into a very big fight with one of the top guys - you take the risks you get the rewards, you don't take the risks people stop buying your PPV's.

Re: Mundine hypothetical

Posted: 31 Jan 2014, 02:09
by Beltane
Same thing with Blake Caparello, who goes over 10 rounds with fellow light heavy with an impressive record: Elvir Muriqi 40(24)-5(1)-0 this Saturday afternoon (AEDT) with the fight to be shown on Foxtel's ESPN2.

Another example of "who dares wins"!

With Mundine now approaching 39, his daring days have passed.

Re: Mundine hypothetical

Posted: 31 Jan 2014, 06:47
by fox
Hounddawg wrote:
fox wrote:Yeah the fights were one sided but wasn't that bad of night. See a lot of worse shows that's for sure. With a couple of opponent changes it really wasn't that bad. We can all see Choc is not going to match it with the top dogs, but seriously who in Australia will. He is still one of the best we have got. Lets hope Alex can land with clean and bring the Heavyweight Title home. Even the ugly fights on paper didn't turn out too bad last night.

Geale, Soliman can match it with the best, and have already proved it? a few young blokes comn through are going to put us in the spotlight mate...Horn, McCulloch, Hooper, Caperello Carr and Brown.

We also have Leapai on a wing and a pray for the Heavyweight title...don't understand the comment...Mundine could match it, but he'll never know
We will see. The card looked shit on paper but turned out not a bad night.

Re: Mundine hypothetical

Posted: 31 Jan 2014, 08:22
by Hounddawg
amwsnw wrote:"Geale, Soliman can match it with the best, and have already proved it? a few young blokes comn through are going to put us in the spotlight mate...Horn, McCulloch, Hooper, Caperello Carr and Brown.

We also have Leapai on a wing and a pray for the Heavyweight title...don't understand the comment...Mundine could match it, but he'll never know"

And don't forget Jarrod Fletcher. who this weekend travels across the world to take a very formidable opponent. And if he wins may leap frog guys into a very big fight with one of the top guys - you take the risks you get the rewards, you don't take the risks people stop buying your PPV's.
well said

Re: Mundine hypothetical

Posted: 31 Jan 2014, 08:24
by Hounddawg
Beltane wrote:Same thing with Blake Caparello, who goes over 10 rounds with fellow light heavy with an impressive record: Elvir Muriqi 40(24)-5(1)-0 this Saturday afternoon (AEDT) with the fight to be shown on Foxtel's ESPN2.

Another example of "who dares wins"!

With Mundine now approaching 39, his daring days have passed.
Really looking forward to this.

I'm also buying Fletchers card.

Tomlinson may have something to say as well soon.

Re: Mundine hypothetical

Posted: 01 Feb 2014, 01:12
by caveman
Hounddawg wrote:
caveman wrote:only fight i reckon that was ok was the casey-quinlan fight,and that wasnt worth ppv,another one looked ok but was a lot of slappin, how can u put a 46 year old against 21 year old, plus 1 W 13 L against 9 with no loss, and quad cooper fought a midget, and call it a ppv card, the card was ridiculous as mundine cards always r

Agree mate. I didnt watch but on paper, the worse card I've seen on PPV.

Side note, Is Shane ever returning to the ring
doubt it hounddawg, he has 5 boys from 7 year old down,dont think he is allowed out of the house much lol

Re: Mundine hypothetical

Posted: 03 Feb 2014, 06:38
by Hounddawg
caveman wrote:
Hounddawg wrote:
caveman wrote:only fight i reckon that was ok was the casey-quinlan fight,and that wasnt worth ppv,another one looked ok but was a lot of slappin, how can u put a 46 year old against 21 year old, plus 1 W 13 L against 9 with no loss, and quad cooper fought a midget, and call it a ppv card, the card was ridiculous as mundine cards always r
Happy for him, and I hope he's happy. Really 1 guy that could have done anything, his record was not 7 wins and 5 draws, he won a few of those draws. Never seen the Caperello fight, seeing where he's gone to, and being the only bloke to give him a real shake...he must be wondering?

Agree mate. I didnt watch but on paper, the worse card I've seen on PPV.

Side note, Is Shane ever returning to the ring
doubt it hounddawg, he has 5 boys from 7 year old down,dont think he is allowed out of the house much lol

Re: Mundine hypothetical

Posted: 10 Feb 2014, 05:20
by bogan whisperer
Hounddawg wrote:
AntonS wrote:
dan h wrote:Better compared to what?

1. Better than Normal $50 PPV Cards?
2. Better than normal Mundine PPV cards? or
3. Better than recent Australian domestic cards (aired free on TV),
Mundine has produced at least 2 very very decent scraps on his under cards.

Leapai v Walker
Sam vs Aloua

That is all
13 1/2 years and he's had two noteworthy preliminaries on his cards. That's fabulous.