Re: Fury signs with FW. Stunning.
Posted: 08 Jan 2014, 10:25
That fight is probably a major part of why this deal is likely to happen.Horse wrote:Hopefully this doesn't lead to Fury vs Chisora II.
That fight is probably a major part of why this deal is likely to happen.Horse wrote:Hopefully this doesn't lead to Fury vs Chisora II.
Doesn't Wlad vs Chisora make more money than Fury vs Chisora II?columbo wrote:That fight is probably a major part of why this deal is likely to happen.
It'd be good if they could cooperate to make each other have a better chance.Horse wrote:Doesn't Wlad vs Chisora make more money than Fury vs Chisora II?columbo wrote:That fight is probably a major part of why this deal is likely to happen.
Fury's going to ruin Chisora's recent good run towards another world title shot. They should both be chasing a world title mandatory challenger position, not getting in each other's way.
He said a lot and I lost some respect for him as a consequence, if he's fallen out with Sky Sports and burnt bridges purely because he doesn't know what the word "pretender" means in the context Adam Smith used it (i.e. young pretender, which is an accurate assessment of Fury's status and is non-pejorative), he may not be quite as wise as people seem to think he is.500BHP wrote:Tyson's uncle said SKY can beep off so no surprise at this news.
Words have different meanings and Smith can be a bit too knowing sometimes and to be honest I prefer someone who speaks from the heart whether I agree with them or not; there are too many smarmy people with fantastic vocabularies who do not give anything of themselves away. Sky are aligned with Haye in any case and have done Fury no favours for his camp to be bothered.Aden wrote:He said a lot and I lost some respect for him as a consequence, if he's fallen out with Sky Sports and burnt bridges purely because he doesn't know what the word "pretender" means in the context Adam Smith used it (i.e. young pretender, which is an accurate assessment of Fury's status and is non-pejorative), he may not be quite as wise as people seem to think he is.500BHP wrote:Tyson's uncle said SKY can beep off so no surprise at this news.
The point I'm making is that in a recent interview, Peter Fury implied that he fell out with Adam Smith and Sky Sports because Smith introduced Tyson as "the young pretender". He said "Sky Sports can go fornicate themselves" or words to that effect. If that's right, he's dropped a bollock, in my view - cutting off a major television network because he doesn't understand the meaning of a particular word in a particular context surely isn't shrewd business?palooka wrote:Words have different meanings and to be honest I prefer someone who speaks from the heart whether I agree with them or not; there are too many smarmy people with fantastic vocabularies who do not give anything of themselves away.Aden wrote:He said a lot and I lost some respect for him as a consequence, if he's fallen out with Sky Sports and burnt bridges purely because he doesn't know what the word "pretender" means in the context Adam Smith used it (i.e. young pretender, which is an accurate assessment of Fury's status and is non-pejorative), he may not be quite as wise as people seem to think he is.500BHP wrote:Tyson's uncle said SKY can beep off so no surprise at this news.
Does anyone remember the Chisora - Wilder announcement? Looks like Lightning has struck twicecolumbo wrote:Well FW didnt hang about lol http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcTZ3F3m2hg
x2 - this seems to be a 1 or 2 fight deal at this stage, probably as a co(ish)-promotion in Feb and not 'Fury signs with FW lock, stock and barrell'.jameswilson wrote:Read the fightnews article that Alba posted above.
It seems it is just a case of signing for possibly 2 fights (a warm up and then Chisora in June) to fight on allegedly and then going from there.
Why?Horse wrote:Hopefully this doesn't lead to Fury vs Chisora II.
columbo wrote:Well FW didnt hang about lol http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcTZ3F3m2hg
Chambers2 wrote:Why?Horse wrote:Hopefully this doesn't lead to Fury vs Chisora II.
Basically because I want them both to get world title shots in the next year or so, not just one of them.Horse wrote:Doesn't Wlad vs Chisora make more money than Fury vs Chisora II?columbo wrote:That fight is probably a major part of why this deal is likely to happen.
Fury's going to ruin Chisora's recent good run towards another world title shot. They should both be chasing a world title mandatory challenger position, not getting in each other's way.
Much more fun to dive in headfirst though !Jack B wrote:Seems like FW is jumping the gun just a little bit! Let's see what happens over the next few days, then everybody can make an informed assessment on the situation.
Mick looked dead and buried earlier today, and now the resurrection commences. #TeamMickJack B wrote:Seems like FW is jumping the gun just a little bit! Let's see what happens over the next few days, then everybody can make an informed assessment on the situation.
