BoxRec

Rees should appeal to the BBBofC and try and get it made a No Contest.

In fairness, I thought he won, fair and square.

Horse wrote:Rees vs Crolla wasn't a robbery, but this fight was.

Rees was clearly the winner in a close fight, just like Beltran was against Burns.

Not being funny mate , but your talking out your arse comparing the Beltran burns robbery to Buckland v Rees , burns had the granny punched out of him from pillar to post, jaw broke and was never in that fight.
Buckland had Rees hurt a few times in that fight, it looked like a few times in that corner that he was gonna quit to,very close fight could of went ether way but nothing like that Beltran burns out and out robbery!
I think u need to go to specsavers

CiganoBoxer wrote:Not being funny mate , but your talking out your arse comparing the Beltran burns robbery to Buckland v Rees , burns had the granny punched out of him from pillar to post, jaw broke and was never in that fight.
Buckland had Rees hurt a few times in that fight, it looked like a few times in that corner that he was gonna quit to,very close fight could of went ether way but nothing like that Beltran burns out and out robbery!
I think u need to go to specsavers

This fight couldn't have gone either way, Rees clearly won. It was a robbery.

handsofstone wrote:I,d put a pound on Buckland to stop Crolla if they were to fight

I think Crolla is underrated, seems very accurate and tidy. Thought he beat Derry 2nd time round, definitely beat Rees IMO, should have been UD not MD and was easy V Foster. Didn't see the Sykes 2nd fight over 3 rounds though.. what was that all about??

CiganoBoxer wrote:

Horse wrote:Rees vs Crolla wasn't a robbery, but this fight was.

Rees was clearly the winner in a close fight, just like Beltran was against Burns.

Not being funny mate , but your talking out your arse comparing the Beltran burns robbery to Buckland v Rees , burns had the granny punched out of him from pillar to post, jaw broke and was never in that fight.
Buckland had Rees hurt a few times in that fight, it looked like a few times in that corner that he was gonna quit to,very close fight could of went ether way but nothing like that Beltran burns out and out robbery!
I think u need to go to specsavers

He usually does mate!

I had Rees winning by 3 rounds on the night and after rewatching minus the beer i had him 1 by 2.

again it was no suprise Terry O'connor was involved

columbo wrote:

CiganoBoxer wrote:

Horse wrote:Rees vs Crolla wasn't a robbery, but this fight was.

Rees was clearly the winner in a close fight, just like Beltran was against Burns.

Not being funny mate , but your talking out your arse comparing the Beltran burns robbery to Buckland v Rees , burns had the granny punched out of him from pillar to post, jaw broke and was never in that fight.
Buckland had Rees hurt a few times in that fight, it looked like a few times in that corner that he was gonna quit to,very close fight could of went ether way but nothing like that Beltran burns out and out robbery!
I think u need to go to specsavers

He usually does mate!

Wanna chip in for him ?

Wasnt surprised to See IJL jump in to another controvesial stoppage in the selby fight also

its becoming a main talking point in british boxing these days , Judges and Refs

gazza8 wrote:I had Rees winning by 3 rounds on the night and after rewatching minus the beer i had him 1 by 2.

again it was no suprise Terry O'connor was involved

columbo wrote:He usually does mate!

Horse wrote:

columbo wrote:He usually does mate!

owned

palooka wrote:

Horse wrote:

columbo wrote:He usually does mate!

owned

Yep. Game, set and match to columbo.

palooka wrote: owned

Insulting people is easy. I was not "owned" by columbo's bland insult.

Horse wrote:

palooka wrote: owned

Insulting people is easy. I was not "owned" by columbo's bland insult.

The first 2 sentence post by Horse in living memory.

Horse wrote:

palooka wrote: owned

Insulting people is easy. I was not "owned" by columbo's bland insult.

Opinion states otherwise.

Should we have a poll?

palooka wrote:The first 2 sentence post by Horse in living memory.

I've posted four 2 sentence posts in this thread alone.

What are you on about?

I've got poor short term memory but I'm happy you went and counted them for me

palooka wrote:I've got poor short term memory but I'm happy you went and counted them for me

So what was the point of your comment anyway? To mock my conciseness?

Horse wrote:

palooka wrote:I've got poor short term memory but I'm happy you went and counted them for me

So what was the point of your comment anyway? To mock my conciseness?

Get over yourself high Horse - you come across as someone who knows a lot about boxing but who is a bit of a cock.

palooka wrote:Get over yourself high Horse - you come across as someone who knows a lot about boxing but who is a bit of a cock.

Good.

Horse wrote:

palooka wrote:Get over yourself high Horse - you come across as someone who knows a lot about boxing but who is a bit of a cock.

Good.

You're happy to be a cock?

Rees hitting low constantly not mentioned yet?

Personally i thought Rees nicked it, but how many favours did he do himself having to be pushed back to the corner between rounds? a close round could easily be lost due to Buckland looking the fresher man consistently.

It was a 50-50 fight IMO, could've gone eitehr way, certainly no robbery

Chambers2 wrote:It was a 50-50 fight IMO, could've gone eitehr way, certainly no robbery

It wasn't 50-50 though. 0 out of 25 members of the press scored it for Buckland and the average press score had Rees winning by three points.

Horse wrote:

Chambers2 wrote:It was a 50-50 fight IMO, could've gone eitehr way, certainly no robbery

It wasn't 50-50 though. 0 out of 25 members of the press scored it for Buckland and the average press score had Rees winning by three points.

aaaaaah, the press, never ones to have an agenda them.


Gav did himself no favours. How many times did Buckland get wheeled back to the corner by his trainer?