Page 2 of 2
Re: Is it time for a Pernell Whitaker review ?
Posted: 19 Feb 2014, 10:09
by Ambling Alp II
If I have them mixed up, my apologies.
Re: Is it time for a Pernell Whitaker review ?
Posted: 19 Feb 2014, 10:20
by King Carlos
I'm thinking so. The first fight was close. I saw it as an impressive showing for both men.
Re: Is it time for a Pernell Whitaker review ?
Posted: 19 Feb 2014, 12:55
by SaadOffTheDeck
I forgot to mention Vazquez, that was a great win.
Re: Is it time for a Pernell Whitaker review ?
Posted: 19 Feb 2014, 15:25
by elmersalsa
As far I am concerned, The great Pernell "Sweet Pea" Whitaker WAS THE BEST FIGHTER OF HIS ERA.
Re: Is it time for a Pernell Whitaker review ?
Posted: 19 Feb 2014, 15:27
by palooka
elmersalsa wrote:As far I am concerned, The great Pernell "Sweet Pea" Whitaker WAS THE BEST FIGHTER OF HIS ERA.
Maybe the best boxer but I'd put Ricardo Lopez right there with him; Chavez Snr was the best fighter of that era (imo).
Re: Is it time for a Pernell Whitaker review ?
Posted: 19 Feb 2014, 15:58
by SaadOffTheDeck
Chavez could never out-fight Whitaker, though I understand what you're getting at. Even then, Holyfield > Chavez.