BoxRec

The Insider wrote:

Callowland wrote:
I think he means the actual hearing where the Board acts as Judge, Jury and Executioner as allegedly saix whe Chisora lost his licence.

If that's the case, and the same happened to Bruce Baker, everyone needs to know.

Oh right so it wasn't an actual legal court of the land.

Who exactly should hear his case then if He's breaking BBBoC rules?

I wasn't there so it is difficult to speculate.

If it was like Chisora's hearing which as Frank W appears to say was completely unfair, and Renegade's source is genuine, then you don't need to be Einstein to work out something is not right.

The Insider wrote:

Callowland wrote:
I think he means the actual hearing where the Board acts as Judge, Jury and Executioner as allegedly saix whe Chisora lost his licence.

If that's the case, and the same happened to Bruce Baker, everyone needs to know.

Oh right so it wasn't an actual legal court of the land.

Who exactly should hear his case then if He's breaking BBBoC rules?

Exactly who should hear the case ? My opinion hasn't changed from day one if I wasn't happy with any club I was in I would just find another one and that's what Bruce should do instead of trying to change the rules of his existing club but before Bruce can have any credibility whatsoever he should have addressed his own continuos breech of his own regulations which are on his own website as regards his masters titles eligibility which he seems to have blatantly ignored in his pursuit of sanctioning fees

Exactly who should hear the case ? My opinion hasn't changed from day one if I wasn't happy with any club I was in I would just find another one and that's what Bruce should do instead of trying to change the rules of his existing club but before Bruce can have any credibility whatsoever he should have addressed his own continuos breech of his own regulations which are on his own website as regards his masters titles eligibility which he seems to have blatantly ignored in his pursuit of sanctioning fees[/quote]

If the real issue here is the way the hearing was carried out, and it was similar to the way Chisora was treated, then the system is wrong, and if certain commentators on here think that this is acceptable, then the whole of boxing needs to know. I believe Renegade.

Callowland wrote:Exactly who should hear the case ? My opinion hasn't changed from day one if I wasn't happy with any club I was in I would just find another one and that's what Bruce should do instead of trying to change the rules of his existing club but before Bruce can have any credibility whatsoever he should have addressed his own continuos breech of his own regulations which are on his own website as regards his masters titles eligibility which he seems to have blatantly ignored in his pursuit of sanctioning fees

If the real issue here is the way the hearing was carried out, and it was similar to the way Chisora was treated, then the system is wrong, and if certain commentators on here think that this is acceptable, then the whole of boxing needs to know. I believe Renegade.[/quote]


Point taken mate I carnt understand why renegades sorce hasn't resigned from the board in protest instead of leaking info coz obviously the sorce isn't happy with the way the board is run so if he/she had any credibility they would walk away

If the real issue here is the way the hearing was carried out, and it was similar to the way Chisora was treated, then the system is wrong, and if certain commentators on here think that this is acceptable, then the whole of boxing needs to know. I believe Renegade.[/quote]

Point taken mate I carnt understand why renegades sorce hasn't resigned from the board in protest instead of leaking info coz obviously the sorce isn't happy with the way the board is run so if he/she had any credibility they would walk away[/quote]

Through a process of elimination I have worked out Renegade's source is not a Board member, but someone else.

Be interesting to see how the appeal goes.

Correct callowland, ;)

Callowland wrote:If the real issue here is the way the hearing was carried out, and it was similar to the way Chisora was treated, then the system is wrong, and if certain commentators on here think that this is acceptable, then the whole of boxing needs to know. I believe Renegade.

Point taken mate I carnt understand why renegades sorce hasn't resigned from the board in protest instead of leaking info coz obviously the sorce isn't happy with the way the board is run so if he/she had any credibility they would walk away[/quote]

Through a process of elimination I have worked out Renegade's source is not a Board member, but someone else.

Be interesting to see how the appeal goes.[/quote]


Appeal to who ?

spudder56 wrote:

Callowland wrote:If the real issue here is the way the hearing was carried out, and it was similar to the way Chisora was treated, then the system is wrong, and if certain commentators on here think that this is acceptable, then the whole of boxing needs to know. I believe Renegade.

Point taken mate I carnt understand why renegades sorce hasn't resigned from the board in protest instead of leaking info coz obviously the sorce isn't happy with the way the board is run so if he/she had any credibility they would walk away

Through a process of elimination I have worked out Renegade's source is not a Board member, but someone else.

Be interesting to see how the appeal

Appeal to who ?[/quote]

Spudder, get back to your potatoes.

Callowland wrote:

spudder56 wrote:

Callowland wrote:If the real issue here is the way the hearing was carried out, and it was similar to the way Chisora was treated, then the system is wrong, and if certain commentators on here think that this is acceptable, then the whole of boxing needs to know. I believe Renegade.

Point taken mate I carnt understand why renegades sorce hasn't resigned from the board in protest instead of leaking info coz obviously the sorce isn't happy with the way the board is run so if he/she had any credibility they would walk away

Through a process of elimination I have worked out Renegade's source is not a Board member, but someone else.

Be interesting to see how the appeal

Appeal to who ?

Spudder, get back to your potatoes.[/quote]


nice one mate lol