Page 2 of 2

Re: Is the gap between our top 2 promoter's getting wider ?

Posted: 11 Mar 2014, 13:58
by expe
DMA1987 wrote:No way Joshua leaves Eddie
Not now, but if he turns into the undisputed champion superstar some see him becoming, I could quite easily see him leaving.

Re: Is the gap between our top 2 promoter's getting wider ?

Posted: 11 Mar 2014, 14:57
by JimJim2009
expe wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:No way Joshua leaves Eddie
Not now, but if he turns into the undisputed champion superstar some see him becoming, I could quite easily see him leaving.
The thing is, the only thing better than being on Sky Sports is being on Sky Box Office. I think the days of a terrestrial channel paying millions for a world heavyweight title fight involving a Brit are gone for good.

The route to being on Sky Sports is exclusively via Matchroom. Ditto for graduating onto Sky Box Office. I reckon the only time this will change is if there is another promoter, with a good stable, who's available to make a deal with Sky, and Sky desire to make the deal and add a 2nd promoter to supply their boxing.

I may be wrong but I can't see a point in the future where another promoter is going to have a red-hot, well known fighter that Sky just have to have on their Sports channels.

Re: Is the gap between our top 2 promoter's getting wider ?

Posted: 11 Mar 2014, 15:01
by jessi
DMA1987 wrote:No way Joshua leaves Eddie
He will one day

Re: Is the gap between our top 2 promoter's getting wider ?

Posted: 11 Mar 2014, 15:04
by JimJim2009
jessi wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:No way Joshua leaves Eddie
He will one day
I can imagine this conversation happening in a year or two....

Fwank "Joshua, I'll give you two million quid to leave Matchroom and come to me"

Joshua "Sorry Fwank, no can do".

Fwank "Fair enough lad. I'll give you a million quid just to leave Matchroom. Go with whoever you want, I don't care who, just as long as you leave Matchroom. The cxxts"

Re: Is the gap between our top 2 promoter's getting wider ?

Posted: 11 Mar 2014, 17:17
by ashedward
Hearn has the best platform to promote the fights through Sky and with SSN and ringside they do a good job but Hearn has to make the right fights because most people aren't stupid.The policy of having less date but more quality and live fights with each show is working for the most part(Hearn has made some mistakes).Sky/Hearn has eradicated half empty leisure centre shows and most arena are sold out so Hearn is doing a good job.I hope allegedy can make Fury-Chisora and it does well and he can put on some better shows soon, the more competition the better for the sport.

Re: Is the gap between our top 2 promoter's getting wider ?

Posted: 11 Mar 2014, 17:25
by mickey1975
JimJim2009 wrote:
expe wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:No way Joshua leaves Eddie
Not now, but if he turns into the undisputed champion superstar some see him becoming, I could quite easily see him leaving.
The thing is, the only thing better than being on Sky Sports is being on Sky Box Office. I think the days of a terrestrial channel paying millions for a world heavyweight title fight involving a Brit are gone for good.

The route to being on Sky Sports is exclusively via Matchroom. Ditto for graduating onto Sky Box Office. I reckon the only time this will change is if there is another promoter, with a good stable, who's available to make a deal with Sky, and Sky desire to make the deal and add a 2nd promoter to supply their boxing.

I may be wrong but I can't see a point in the future where another promoter is going to have a red-hot, well known fighter that Sky just have to have on their Sports channels.
Sky would bend their rules for an undisputed British champion. As has been said, the landscape changes dramatically if he fulfils the highest of expectations. Eddie is not a player on the world scene. He is better known for producing cannon fodder for the yanks.

Re: Is the gap between our top 2 promoter's getting wider ?

Posted: 11 Mar 2014, 17:39
by JimJim2009
ashedward wrote:Hearn has the best platform to promote the fights through Sky and with SSN and ringside they do a good job but Hearn has to make the right fights because most people aren't stupid.The policy of having less date but more quality and live fights with each show is working for the most part(Hearn has made some mistakes).Sky/Hearn has eradicated half empty leisure centre shows and most arena are sold out so Hearn is doing a good job.I hope allegedy can make Fury-Chisora and it does well and he can put on some better shows soon, the more competition the better for the sport.
Me too, the signs at the moment aren't promising though. I read reports this morning that negotiations are ongoing between the camps of Chisora and Pulev for a European title fight / IBF eliminator in the summer. And, with a month to go, neither Chisora nor Fury are confirmed as being on the next Copperbox show. The plan was meant to be double headers in Feb and April, prior to their rematch in the summer.

Re: Is the gap between our top 2 promoter's getting wider ?

Posted: 11 Mar 2014, 17:52
by ashedward
JimJim2009 wrote:
ashedward wrote:Hearn has the best platform to promote the fights through Sky and with SSN and ringside they do a good job but Hearn has to make the right fights because most people aren't stupid.The policy of having less date but more quality and live fights with each show is working for the most part(Hearn has made some mistakes).Sky/Hearn has eradicated half empty leisure centre shows and most arena are sold out so Hearn is doing a good job.I hope allegedy can make Fury-Chisora and it does well and he can put on some better shows soon, the more competition the better for the sport.
Me too, the signs at the moment aren't promising though. I read reports this morning that negotiations are ongoing between the camps of Chisora and Pulev for a European title fight / IBF eliminator in the summer. And, with a month to go, neither Chisora nor Fury are confirmed as being on the next Copperbox show. The plan was meant to be double headers in Feb and April, prior to their rematch in the summer.
It would be a shame if he couldn`t get that fight on it`s the best fight he can make at the moment and would do good numbers at the stadium and on allegedly it would also get some media coverage.Hopefully it`s gone a bit quite because he will need to make it for July now with the Froch-Groves fight being in late May and with the World cup taking up most of June

Re: Is the gap between our top 2 promoter's getting wider ?

Posted: 11 Mar 2014, 18:25
by mickey1975
Anything he does is going to look small compared to Froch-Groves. Floyd-Khan would have been hugs for the channel if they'd got it.

Re: Is the gap between our top 2 promoter's getting wider ?

Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 06:27
by chinny
I wonder what Matchrooms plan b is if, God forbid, sky were to pull the plug on boxing?

Any company their size must have analysed the main risks to the business and mitigated/ planned for them.

Imagine if they bought allegedly!

Re: Is the gap between our top 2 promoter's getting wider ?

Posted: 12 Mar 2014, 06:28
by chinny
Can look odd in a post that the channel is also changed to allegedly now....