lewison v mcdermott

london
Super Middleweight
Posts: 198
Joined: 24 Oct 2012, 07:16

Re: lewison v mcdermott

Post by london »

rm1 wrote:Lewisons twitter only says ask Goodwin who has just replied.
This would have been a good fight now Lewison is in against Eddie Chambers and looks overmatched I feel it may be the beginning of the end for Lewison.

Lewison said "ask Goodwin it's down to his doing" Which implies it was Goodwin who pulled the fight and Lewison wanted to fight McDermott.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: lewison v mcdermott

Post by lefty »

Horse wrote:
columbo wrote:Gotta be a bit depressing going from the Lofty heights Chambers has boxed at to boxing Lewison *no offence*
No, it shouldn't be depressing at all.
Why shouldnt it be then? So going from boxing the likes of Wladimir to Lewison who doesnt have the biggest profile over here, let alone in the states, isnt a big drop?
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: lewison v mcdermott

Post by Horse »

columbo wrote:Why shouldnt it be then? So going from boxing the likes of Wladimir to Lewison who doesnt have the biggest profile over here, let alone in the states, isnt a big drop?
I didn't say it wasn't a big drop. I said it shouldn't be depressing.

Top fighters often take on lesser opponents inbetween big fights. I don't see anything depressing about him fighting Lewison at all.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: lewison v mcdermott

Post by lefty »

Horse wrote:
columbo wrote:Why shouldnt it be then? So going from boxing the likes of Wladimir to Lewison who doesnt have the biggest profile over here, let alone in the states, isnt a big drop?
I didn't say it wasn't a big drop. I said it shouldn't be depressing.

Top fighters often take on lesser opponents inbetween big fights. I don't see anything depressing about him fighting Lewison at all.
Well if it's just an inbetween fight then yeah you cant complain. I dont know if it will be though as he doesnt have a big promoter behind him anymore.
stevegoodwin
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 372
Joined: 10 Dec 2009, 11:13

Re: lewison v mcdermott

Post by stevegoodwin »

london wrote:
rm1 wrote:Lewisons twitter only says ask Goodwin who has just replied.
This would have been a good fight now Lewison is in against Eddie Chambers and looks overmatched I feel it may be the beginning of the end for Lewison.

Lewison said "ask Goodwin it's down to his doing" Which implies it was Goodwin who pulled the fight and Lewison wanted to fight McDermott.
As I said I DID NOT PULL THE FIGHT Warren did. They then offered the fight with Chambers instead. The McDermott-Lewison fight was put out to purse bids by the board again so I was intending to bid to get the right to stage the fight. Whilst this was going on something happened and I decided to release Ian from his contract.

To clarify all that happened was that Warren decided he no longer wanted to promote the fight anymore and wanted Lewison to fight Chambers instead.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: lewison v mcdermott

Post by lefty »

stevegoodwin wrote:
london wrote:
rm1 wrote:Lewisons twitter only says ask Goodwin who has just replied.
This would have been a good fight now Lewison is in against Eddie Chambers and looks overmatched I feel it may be the beginning of the end for Lewison.

Lewison said "ask Goodwin it's down to his doing" Which implies it was Goodwin who pulled the fight and Lewison wanted to fight McDermott.
As I said I DID NOT PULL THE FIGHT Warren did. They then offered the fight with Chambers instead. The McDermott-Lewison fight was put out to purse bids by the board again so I was intending to bid to get the right to stage the fight. Whilst this was going on something happened and I decided to release Ian from his contract.

To clarify all that happened was that Warren decided he no longer wanted to promote the fight anymore and wanted Lewison to fight Chambers instead.
Ian didnt try and have his wicked way with your daughter did he? :wink: *That's tongue in cheek so dont take it too seriously ok lol*
stevegoodwin
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 372
Joined: 10 Dec 2009, 11:13

Re: lewison v mcdermott

Post by stevegoodwin »

To clarify all that happened was that Warren decided he no longer wanted to promote the fight anymore and wanted Lewison to fight Chambers instead.[/quote]
Ian didnt try and have his wicked way with your daughter did he? :wink: *That's tongue in cheek so dont take it too seriously ok lol*[/quote]

Haha. No Ian is always respectful in that way. Ian felt I had done a bad job with guiding his career in 15 months from a loss to a journeyman to a southern Area Champ an English title which is a virtual British title eliminator. I was offended and I just told him as he felt that way I no longer wanted to work with him. I could have made him sit his contract out for 2 years and taken money but I am a man of principal and I dont behave like that.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: lewison v mcdermott

Post by lefty »

stevegoodwin wrote:To clarify all that happened was that Warren decided he no longer wanted to promote the fight anymore and wanted Lewison to fight Chambers instead.
Ian didnt try and have his wicked way with your daughter did he? :wink: *That's tongue in cheek so dont take it too seriously ok lol*[/quote]

Haha. No Ian is always respectful in that way. Ian felt I had done a bad job with guiding his career in 15 months from a loss to a journeyman to a southern Area Champ an English title which is a virtual British title eliminator. I was offended and I just told him as he felt that way I no longer wanted to work with him. I could have made him sit his contract out for 2 years and taken money but I am a man of principal and I dont behave like that.[/quote]
Fairplay Steve :) ... you always come across as a fair guy in the interviews ive seen of you and on a sidenote im slightly jealous of your 19 or is it 18 year old son now promoting himself? Lucky bugger! :)
stevegoodwin
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 372
Joined: 10 Dec 2009, 11:13

Re: lewison v mcdermott

Post by stevegoodwin »

columbo wrote:
stevegoodwin wrote:To clarify all that happened was that Warren decided he no longer wanted to promote the fight anymore and wanted Lewison to fight Chambers instead.
Ian didnt try and have his wicked way with your daughter did he? :wink: *That's tongue in cheek so dont take it too seriously ok lol*
Haha. No Ian is always respectful in that way. Ian felt I had done a bad job with guiding his career in 15 months from a loss to a journeyman to a southern Area Champ an English title which is a virtual British title eliminator. I was offended and I just told him as he felt that way I no longer wanted to work with him. I could have made him sit his contract out for 2 years and taken money but I am a man of principal and I dont behave like that.[/quote]
Fairplay Steve :) ... you always come across as a fair guy in the interviews ive seen of you and on a sidenote im slightly jealous of your 19 or is it 18 year old son now promoting himself? Lucky bugger! :)[/quote]

He loves the sport and is really committed. I believe he will be a major player in years to come. Just thought I would say what happened with Ian to stop some of the nonsense being said. Lets see if someone does a better job ongoing!
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: lewison v mcdermott

Post by lefty »

stevegoodwin wrote:
columbo wrote:
stevegoodwin wrote:To clarify all that happened was that Warren decided he no longer wanted to promote the fight anymore and wanted Lewison to fight Chambers instead.
Ian didnt try and have his wicked way with your daughter did he? :wink: *That's tongue in cheek so dont take it too seriously ok lol*
Haha. No Ian is always respectful in that way. Ian felt I had done a bad job with guiding his career in 15 months from a loss to a journeyman to a southern Area Champ an English title which is a virtual British title eliminator. I was offended and I just told him as he felt that way I no longer wanted to work with him. I could have made him sit his contract out for 2 years and taken money but I am a man of principal and I dont behave like that.
Fairplay Steve :) ... you always come across as a fair guy in the interviews ive seen of you and on a sidenote im slightly jealous of your 19 or is it 18 year old son now promoting himself? Lucky bugger! :)[/quote]

He loves the sport and is really committed. I believe he will be a major player in years to come. Just thought I would say what happened with Ian to stop some of the nonsense being said. Lets see if someone does a better job ongoing![/quote]
Yeah I saw his interview on Ifilm london. He came across as a very mature man who's still in his teens! Also seemed very modest about how things were going and so on. You've clearly done a good job raising him mate :TU:
london
Super Middleweight
Posts: 198
Joined: 24 Oct 2012, 07:16

Re: lewison v mcdermott

Post by london »

stevegoodwin wrote:To clarify all that happened was that Warren decided he no longer wanted to promote the fight anymore and wanted Lewison to fight Chambers instead.
Ian didnt try and have his wicked way with your daughter did he? :wink: *That's tongue in cheek so dont take it too seriously ok lol*[/quote]

Haha. No Ian is always respectful in that way. Ian felt I had done a bad job with guiding his career in 15 months from a loss to a journeyman to a southern Area Champ an English title which is a virtual British title eliminator. I was offended and I just told him as he felt that way I no longer wanted to work with him. I could have made him sit his contract out for 2 years and taken money but I am a man of principal and I dont behave like that.[/quote]




That's a better explanation it stops speculation.

Good luck with the future you put on decent shows.
Post Reply