Page 2 of 2
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Posted: 30 Mar 2014, 08:02
by billy nelson
ShadrachSimmo wrote:Prince was the perfect opponent for Saunders. Not a bad fighter but with no power at all.
On this evidence Saunders beats Limond easily.
Bradley would be the fav but would find willie more difficult than Mitch because of his technical ability
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Posted: 30 Mar 2014, 14:11
by tear up
billy nelson wrote:ShadrachSimmo wrote:Prince was the perfect opponent for Saunders. Not a bad fighter but with no power at all.
On this evidence Saunders beats Limond easily.
Bradley would be the fav but would find willie more difficult than Mitch because of his technical ability
Brad would stop limond brad can go as far as he wants up to him
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Posted: 30 Mar 2014, 14:38
by billy nelson
tear up wrote:billy nelson wrote:ShadrachSimmo wrote:Prince was the perfect opponent for Saunders. Not a bad fighter but with no power at all.
On this evidence Saunders beats Limond easily.
Bradley would be the fav but would find willie more difficult than Mitch because of his technical ability
Brad would stop limond brad can go as far as he wants up to him
I thought he win British and euro
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Posted: 31 Mar 2014, 06:24
by daviddee
I think questions will get answered when someone with a bit of power hits Bradley back.. He reminds me a bit of Bigger Alex Arthur. Huge for the weight and likes to bully opponents.. I can see Willie giving him some questions but would expect a stoppage in the first half of the fight.. I hope Woodhouse is not fed to him.. Bradley is all wrong for Curtis hope he can avoid that one
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Posted: 31 Mar 2014, 07:53
by curtis wood
Brad looks a real good fighter, got all the moves and seems to bang hard, I won't be fed to anybody, I'm not that daft, but everybody has a price
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Posted: 31 Mar 2014, 09:29
by JamieM
Curtis very honest if you, money does talk though and FW will want that title in his camp , but I believe that Dave has Eddie working behind him for you as your as tough as they come and your story sells, I believe Dave will not want that fight unless you have no other option. Tommy Coyle is a major money maker, Darren Hamilton rematch and anyone who's name
Is not Bradley Saunders is the route i would go down :p
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Posted: 31 Mar 2014, 10:01
by mickey1975
No disrespect at all Curtis but Brad is the worst fight possible for you. He was boxing top class internationally whilst you were playing top class football. Tommy Coyle is the only fight that is worth continuing for, and it's winnable.
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Posted: 31 Mar 2014, 10:25
by tear up
mickey1975 wrote:No disrespect at all Curtis but Brad is the worst fight possible for you. He was boxing top class internationally whilst you were playing top class football. Tommy Coyle is the only fight that is worth continuing for, and it's winnable.
Tommy Coyle don't deserve a shot at Curtis mate
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Posted: 31 Mar 2014, 10:31
by mickey1975
tear up wrote:mickey1975 wrote:No disrespect at all Curtis but Brad is the worst fight possible for you. He was boxing top class internationally whilst you were playing top class football. Tommy Coyle is the only fight that is worth continuing for, and it's winnable.
Tommy Coyle don't deserve a shot at Curtis mate
Curtis didn't at Hamilton and Ward definitely didn't at Hall. It's great business in Hull and will happen.
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Posted: 31 Mar 2014, 10:39
by billy nelson
mickey1975 wrote:No disrespect at all Curtis but Brad is the worst fight possible for you. He was boxing top class internationally whilst you were playing top class football. Tommy Coyle is the only fight that is worth continuing for, and it's winnable.
Bradley's got to much for Tommy IMO good fight all the same
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Posted: 31 Mar 2014, 10:43
by tear up
mickey1975 wrote:tear up wrote:mickey1975 wrote:No disrespect at all Curtis but Brad is the worst fight possible for you. He was boxing top class internationally whilst you were playing top class football. Tommy Coyle is the only fight that is worth continuing for, and it's winnable.
Tommy Coyle don't deserve a shot at Curtis mate
Curtis didn't at Hamilton and Ward definitely didn't at Hall. It's great business in Hull and will happen.
Knew you was going to put that ha
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Posted: 31 Mar 2014, 11:05
by mickey1975
billy nelson wrote:mickey1975 wrote:No disrespect at all Curtis but Brad is the worst fight possible for you. He was boxing top class internationally whilst you were playing top class football. Tommy Coyle is the only fight that is worth continuing for, and it's winnable.
Bradley's got to much for Tommy IMO good fight all the same
I agree. I mean Curtis and tommy makes sense.
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Posted: 31 Mar 2014, 11:32
by Black Sam Bellamy
Cue all the usual 'levels' nonsense as one lightwelter after another ducks Saunders now.
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Posted: 31 Mar 2014, 12:27
by billy nelson
Black Sam Bellamy wrote:Cue all the usual 'levels' nonsense as one lightwelter after another ducks Saunders now.
I know Willie and Curtis well and i can assure you no way would eithier duck a fight there true fighting men
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Posted: 31 Mar 2014, 12:27
by billy nelson
Black Sam Bellamy wrote:Cue all the usual 'levels' nonsense as one lightwelter after another ducks Saunders now.
I know Willie and Curtis well and i can assure you no way would eithier duck a fight there true fighting men
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Posted: 03 Apr 2014, 09:08
by THEBUTCH
Have to be careful not to get carried away, however, Saunders is looking superb at the moment and it would be a mistake not to take him seriously.
Loved the comment from Francis Warren about the creepy nature of Bradley walking back to his corner smiling after he put Prince down (again). He clearly loves getting in the boxing ring and bashing opponents up.
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Posted: 03 Apr 2014, 09:59
by palooka
THEBUTCH wrote:Have to be careful not to get carried away, however, Saunders is looking superb at the moment and it would be a mistake not to take him seriously.
Loved the comment from Francis Warren about the creepy nature of Bradley walking back to his corner smiling after he put Prince down (again). He clearly loves getting in the boxing ring and bashing opponents up.
There are plenty that like to dish it out, we'll have to see how much he enjoys it when he's getting some back.
Re: Bradley Saunders v Mitch Prince
Posted: 03 Apr 2014, 11:48
by ShadrachSimmo
THEBUTCH wrote:Have to be careful not to get carried away, however, Saunders is looking superb at the moment and it would be a mistake not to take him seriously.
Loved the comment from Francis Warren about the creepy nature of Bradley walking back to his corner smiling after he put Prince down (again). He clearly loves getting in the boxing ring and bashing opponents up.
Maybe a little too much he hit prince twice after going down.