Re: Anyone one else think Howard Eastman under achieved big time
Posted: 04 Apr 2014, 18:04
Is that a rhetorical question?mickey1975 wrote:Why was he robbed against Abraham?hurlock wrote:Very good fighter & he was respected by the top middles as he'd bashed plenty up sparring stateside. He was badly robbed v Abraham which was in his twilight but simply tensed up against the best! Joppy he let that fight slip away basically threw it away & Hopkins handled him with care & caution & Howard was happy to stay on the leash so to speak.
Under achiever no.
Orbtastic 8)
you're spoiling us ambassador