Page 2 of 3
Re: DANNY DYER ON RINGSIDE
Posted: 04 Apr 2014, 11:26
by palooka
Crazyboy wrote:dbf wrote:Shows how desperate they are to appeal to a wider audience.
Boxing is dying, I don't doubt that now. Froch v Groves is very much the exception. The majority of shows are poor.
I think thats a bit silly really, if exposure is what it needs then why not?
if we need a wider audience to get money back into the sport...why not?
What exactly did you not like about it?
if the people that (sadly) watch eastenders then tune into Ringside because Danny Dyer is apperaing on it...surely that gets boxing out there a bit more,
I wish more 'celebrities' would appear, why not?
I wish more boxers would appear in Eastenders and on Emmerdale and at the awards ceremonies and the Oscars though it seems to be a one way street.
Re: DANNY DYER ON RINGSIDE
Posted: 04 Apr 2014, 11:26
by TopGun
palooka wrote:Link please topgun

Rather not. Columbo managed to find it. Try putting in 'Richard and judy scandal' into google images. It may appear more at the top
Re: DANNY DYER ON RINGSIDE
Posted: 04 Apr 2014, 11:28
by handsofstone

Haha must be photoshopped but it sure does look real
Re: DANNY DYER ON RINGSIDE
Posted: 04 Apr 2014, 11:29
by Crazyboy
palooka wrote:Crazyboy wrote:dbf wrote:Shows how desperate they are to appeal to a wider audience.
Boxing is dying, I don't doubt that now. Froch v Groves is very much the exception. The majority of shows are poor.
I think thats a bit silly really, if exposure is what it needs then why not?
if we need a wider audience to get money back into the sport...why not?
What exactly did you not like about it?
if the people that (sadly) watch eastenders then tune into Ringside because Danny Dyer is apperaing on it...surely that gets boxing out there a bit more,
I wish more 'celebrities' would appear, why not?
I wish more boxers would appear in Eastenders and on Emmerdale and at the awards ceremonies and the Oscars though it seems to be a one way street.
They don't need the money or exposure though eh...
i guess all i mean is....i don't know why anyone would see it as a bad thing........
Soccer AM being a good example...loads of non football related people on there all the time, everyone seems to love that show
Re: DANNY DYER ON RINGSIDE
Posted: 04 Apr 2014, 11:35
by dbf
Crazyboy wrote:dbf wrote:Shows how desperate they are to appeal to a wider audience.
Boxing is dying, I don't doubt that now. Froch v Groves is very much the exception. The majority of shows are poor.
I think thats a bit silly really, if exposure is what it needs then why not?
if we need a wider audience to get money back into the sport...why not?
What exactly did you not like about it?
if the people that (sadly) watch eastenders then tune into Ringside because Danny Dyer is apperaing on it...surely that gets boxing out there a bit more,
I wish more 'celebrities' would appear, why not?
Getting Dyer on though? I think that's silly.
Most British boxers at the moment are pretty boring personality wise. Good and hard working athletes yes - exciting and enthralling to here talk/tweet, no.
We need a few personalities who can sell the sport themselves.
You don't just need a wider audience to get money back into the sport, you need to be putting on consistent quality cards with real fights, not the duds that the majority of fighters have been facing recently. For every Froch Groves (and lets not forget Groves wanted that fight not Froch or Hearn initially) we about 10 Quigg v someone no-ones heard of.
Re: DANNY DYER ON RINGSIDE
Posted: 04 Apr 2014, 11:36
by stevieb_8006
Crazyboy wrote:
They don't need the money or exposure though eh...
i guess all i mean is....i don't know why anyone would see it as a bad thing........
Soccer AM being a good example...loads of non football related people on there all the time, everyone seems to love that show
exactly, boxing fans are so unbelievably elitist. they moan like fukk that "boxing is dying", then whinge when any attempt is actually made to draw in the casuals. Trainspotter mentality.
I'd like to see the sport lighten up a bit, we could see an end to all the "I bet you've never even boxed a round..." comments then.
Re: DANNY DYER ON RINGSIDE
Posted: 04 Apr 2014, 11:55
by dbf
stevieb_8006 wrote:Crazyboy wrote:
They don't need the money or exposure though eh...
i guess all i mean is....i don't know why anyone would see it as a bad thing........
Soccer AM being a good example...loads of non football related people on there all the time, everyone seems to love that show
exactly, boxing fans are so unbelievably elitist. they moan like fukk that "boxing is dying", then whinge when any attempt is actually made to draw in the casuals. Trainspotter mentality.
I'd like to see the sport lighten up a bit, we could see an end to all the "I bet you've never even boxed a round..." comments then.
Nothing elitist about this. It's just weird. If Sky Sports wanted to attract a bigger audience get a footballer who's passionate about boxing on the set. I'm all for thinking outside of the box, but I mean, well, come on.
This is not about 'never boxed a round' thats almost annoying as "hes a real boxing person". Both views are outdated.
Re: DANNY DYER ON RINGSIDE
Posted: 04 Apr 2014, 12:02
by Crazyboy
dbf wrote:stevieb_8006 wrote:Crazyboy wrote:
They don't need the money or exposure though eh...
i guess all i mean is....i don't know why anyone would see it as a bad thing........
Soccer AM being a good example...loads of non football related people on there all the time, everyone seems to love that show
exactly, boxing fans are so unbelievably elitist. they moan like fukk that "boxing is dying", then whinge when any attempt is actually made to draw in the casuals. Trainspotter mentality.
I'd like to see the sport lighten up a bit, we could see an end to all the "I bet you've never even boxed a round..." comments then.
Nothing elitist about this. It's just weird. If Sky Sports wanted to attract a bigger audience get a footballer who's passionate about boxing on the set. I'm all for thinking outside of the box, but I mean, well, come on.
This is not about 'never boxed a round' thats almost annoying as "hes a real boxing person". Both views are outdated.
Why is it weird? I still don't get why you don't like the idea of celebreties (whether thats, actors, musicians, stars from other sports.....whoever) to appear. why pidgeon hole it to, boxers or ex boxers, or someone else who is involved in boxing..
maybe i'm wrong but i like the idea of opening it up a bit to a wider audience
Re: DANNY DYER ON RINGSIDE
Posted: 04 Apr 2014, 12:03
by milpool
Re: DANNY DYER ON RINGSIDE
Posted: 04 Apr 2014, 12:10
by stevieb_8006
dbf wrote:stevieb_8006 wrote:Crazyboy wrote:
They don't need the money or exposure though eh...
i guess all i mean is....i don't know why anyone would see it as a bad thing........
Soccer AM being a good example...loads of non football related people on there all the time, everyone seems to love that show
exactly, boxing fans are so unbelievably elitist. they moan like fukk that "boxing is dying", then whinge when any attempt is actually made to draw in the casuals. Trainspotter mentality.
I'd like to see the sport lighten up a bit, we could see an end to all the "I bet you've never even boxed a round..." comments then.
Nothing elitist about this. It's just weird. If Sky Sports wanted to attract a bigger audience get a footballer who's passionate about boxing on the set. I'm all for thinking outside of the box, but I mean, well, come on.
This is not about 'never boxed a round' thats almost annoying as "hes a real boxing person". Both views are outdated.
I think acting and football are both equally far removed from boxing, I don't really see the difference. Unless you mean a footballer that's boxed a bit (I think roy keane and rooney both boxed, not sure I'm not a football fan anymore). I agree getting in celebs that have previously boxed would be good. Will Mellor, Lee Evans, ray winstone, micky rourke etc. (you could do a whole thread on that.... Chris Issak and Terrence Trent D'arby both won the golden gloves!!! Don't ask me how the fukk I know that).
Its interesting that many feel Dyers interest in boxing isn't "real" enough for them. I mean he did a documentary with dominic negus, he's been on a few shows with GG, I don't see why he cant be considered a "fan". Granted it would've made more sense to have maybe had in that manc lad that had been out to the wild card who actually trains, but I haven't a problem with it.
Re: DANNY DYER ON RINGSIDE
Posted: 04 Apr 2014, 12:22
by Emmseegee
I like the idea of celebrities going on ringside, I just dont like Danny Dyer. Im sure I read somewhere that Michael Owen boxed as an amateur which surprised me at the time but im not sure what kind of level he was at.
The whole celebrity thing is big in the states with the boxing, announcing who is in attendance at fights etc. Theres a bit of a difference between a Di Caprio and a Dyer tho. Lol.
Re: DANNY DYER ON RINGSIDE
Posted: 04 Apr 2014, 13:01
by palooka
TopGun wrote:palooka wrote:Link please topgun

Rather not. Columbo managed to find it. Try putting in 'Richard and judy scandal' into google images. It may appear more at the top
Columbo finds more than the NSA and CGHQ combined.
Re: DANNY DYER ON RINGSIDE
Posted: 04 Apr 2014, 13:12
by Final round
I've not seen it but getting a few celeb's on the show to show support for the sport and have a chat about current fights they are interested in can only be a good thing (in general)
Re: DANNY DYER ON RINGSIDE
Posted: 04 Apr 2014, 13:34
by expe
Crazyboy wrote:dbf wrote:Shows how desperate they are to appeal to a wider audience.
Boxing is dying, I don't doubt that now. Froch v Groves is very much the exception. The majority of shows are poor.
I think thats a bit silly really, if exposure is what it needs then why not?
if we need a wider audience to get money back into the sport...why not?
What exactly did you not like about it?
if the people that (sadly) watch eastenders then tune into Ringside because Danny Dyer is appearing on it...surely that gets boxing out there a bit more,
I wish more 'celebreties' would appear.......why not?
There's plenty of people that when they hear or see that Danny Dyer is on Ringside, they will change the channel, rather than actually watching.
Re: DANNY DYER ON RINGSIDE
Posted: 04 Apr 2014, 13:47
by Datsue
For the record, I think it's a bit mental to see Danny Dyer on Ringside as a sign the sport is dying.
Danny Dyer having a cvnting career, now that's not just a sign but the actual leading edge of the apocalypse itself.
Re: DANNY DYER ON RINGSIDE
Posted: 04 Apr 2014, 15:09
by Crazyboy
expe wrote:Crazyboy wrote:dbf wrote:Shows how desperate they are to appeal to a wider audience.
Boxing is dying, I don't doubt that now. Froch v Groves is very much the exception. The majority of shows are poor.
I think thats a bit silly really, if exposure is what it needs then why not?
if we need a wider audience to get money back into the sport...why not?
What exactly did you not like about it?
if the people that (sadly) watch eastenders then tune into Ringside because Danny Dyer is appearing on it...surely that gets boxing out there a bit more,
I wish more 'celebreties' would appear.......why not?
There's plenty of people that when they hear or see that Danny Dyer is on Ringside, they will change the channel, rather than actually watching.
thats a fair comment
Re: DANNY DYER ON RINGSIDE
Posted: 04 Apr 2014, 17:10
by Coco
I think Michael Owen had 3 fights for Chester ABC as a schoolboy, think he won them too, and isn't Danny Dyer from Canning Town?
Re: DANNY DYER ON RINGSIDE
Posted: 04 Apr 2014, 18:49
by whiskey
Dyer looked rough as arseholes. He had bags under his eyes that would make Ian Beale blush.
Kevin Mitchell came across as genuine and interesting, cant help but root for him when you hear him talk.
Re: DANNY DYER ON RINGSIDE
Posted: 04 Apr 2014, 18:59
by misterpunch
billy Mitchell would have been better - he at least drinks in a pub that houses a boxing club. but best would have been Janine - I wouldn't tangle with her.
then again danny did a terrific job with the olympic opening ceremony so he gets my

Re: DANNY DYER ON RINGSIDE
Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 02:01
by glens73
Re: DANNY DYER ON RINGSIDE
Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 03:51
by mickey1975
G0mez wrote:Dyer looked rough as arseholes. He had bags under his eyes that would make Ian Beale blush.
Kevin Mitchell came across as genuine and interesting, cant help but root for him when you hear him talk.
I disagree. I like watching Kevin get chinned. Maybe it's because I was gutted when he beat Johannesson(or Carl threw away) or maybe it's the way he was discussing unification with Marquez at the PRE fight presser with Katsidis.
Re: DANNY DYER ON RINGSIDE
Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 05:49
by stevieb_8006
misterpunch wrote:billy Mitchell would have been better - he at least drinks in a pub that houses a boxing club. but best would have been Janine - I wouldn't tangle with her.
then again danny did a terrific job with the olympic opening ceremony so he gets my

I bumped into billy Mitchell in a pub and he was a sound bloke. Brought me a pint. true story.
Re: DANNY DYER ON RINGSIDE
Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 06:07
by palooka
Coco wrote:I think Michael Owen had 3 fights for Chester ABC as a schoolboy, think he won them too, and isn't Danny Dyer from Canning Town?
So's Jeremy Kyle and if he's on Ringside next week I'll boot the telly in.
Re: DANNY DYER ON RINGSIDE
Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 06:27
by mickey1975
palooka wrote:Coco wrote:I think Michael Owen had 3 fights for Chester ABC as a schoolboy, think he won them too, and isn't Danny Dyer from Canning Town?
So's Jeremy Kyle and if he's on Ringside next week I'll boot the telly in.
If that's the criteria then I want to see Dave Hunt on. Bet he gels with Adam.
Re: DANNY DYER ON RINGSIDE
Posted: 05 Apr 2014, 06:30
by palooka
mickey1975 wrote:palooka wrote:Coco wrote:I think Michael Owen had 3 fights for Chester ABC as a schoolboy, think he won them too, and isn't Danny Dyer from Canning Town?
So's Jeremy Kyle and if he's on Ringside next week I'll boot the telly in.
If that's the criteria then I want to see Dave Hunt on. Bet he gels with Adam.
Yeah, two peas in a pod.