BoxRec

SNG wrote:

DMA1987 wrote:

SNG wrote:
I've not been following his news for a bit who are they looking at for July?

It seems people are finally catching up to what I've been saying for three years.

The winner of Porter v Malignaggi for the IBF.

Can't argue with that. Paulie would be a very winnable fight for Brook, I don't know enough about Porter to properly have an opinion, but from what I've seen I don't think he's anything massively special.

Parson Cross wrote:Like most people I have been waiting for the last 3 years for Brook to step up and prove hes world class. Instead all I have seen are an endless stream of eliminators, final eliminators and "keep busy fights" all against sub par/poor opposition.


Rio
Re above you do know he fights either Paulie or Porter on or before 19/7 ?

rio wrote:

Parson Cross wrote:Like most people I have been waiting for the last 3 years for Brook to step up and prove hes world class. Instead all I have seen are an endless stream of eliminators, final eliminators and "keep busy fights" all against sub par/poor opposition.


Rio
Re above you do know he fights either Paulie or Porter on or before 19/7 ?

Very aware. However I remember after Brook beat senchenko hearn went on record saying Brooks next fight would be against Kahn, broner or for a title. He fought Robles (who??) He should have fought Bradley and all questions would have been answered now. Its time to stop talking the talk and walk the walk. It been a long time coming. Most guys are already champion after 30 fights. If Hearn and co believe he is as good as they let on they would have let him fight Bradley.

Parson Cross wrote:Ffs he is the mandatory for the IBF.
A condition of the Porter v Malinaggi fight is that the winner must face Brook on or before 19/7 or be stripped.
How big a guarentee do you want ?

Parson Cross wrote:What ?
Are you on something ?
Never heard of the 90 day rule ?
Thanks for deleting the pm before I could read it.

Parson Cross wrote:Ffs he is the mandatory for the IBF.
A condition of the Porter v Malinaggi fight is that the winner must face Brook on or before 19/7 or be stripped.
How big a guarentee do you want ?

Parson Cross wrote:

billy nelson wrote:

Michael bennt wrote:You have Eddie Hearn and sky sports ramming it down are throat with all this the special one poo but fact of the matter is he is a European level fighter at best and deep down brooks know it as well, he got offered a fight for the ibf title against k9 bundredge and turned it down he then turned a fight back against Bradley and he also didn't want none of Devon Alexander, I just don't see a world level fighter, plus I have heard of boxing people I highly respect that he doesn't live the life he is a party animal and has gone up in weight as high as 14 stone, other top welterweight like , mayweather, Thurman, Madina ,Bradley, Marquez, pacquiao would all knock him out and hurt him and I would also pick the underrated Shawn porter and Robert Guerrero to out point him the so called special one

I think your spot on I'd favour all the names you've mentioned and Amir Khan to beat Kell

mickey1975 wrote:If Kell can keep strong at the weight, he's a problem for all the top fighters.

BAP1 wrote:

mickey1975 wrote:If Kell can keep strong at the weight, he's a problem for all the top fighters.

How did you come to that conclusion?

littlepug wrote:Think kell struggles to go through the gears, also not sure how mentally strong he is.

Kilburn wrote:I think Porter could well be a nightmare for Brook personally.