Page 2 of 2

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Posted: 09 Apr 2014, 02:41
by DMA1987
columbo wrote:
Taansend wrote:
G0mez wrote:I reckon Eddie is going to try and make this a proper all-dayer of fights with a couple of mustard showdowns before the main event.
I agree, mate. This is not just about Froch v Groves but also about Eddie Hearns legacy on the sport. If the undercard is shite & the main event fails for whatever reason he'll be as pissed off as anyone.

He genuinely loves the sport & his place in it. He seems like a kid on Chrimbo morning.
He loves the pound note more than he loves the sport.
Do you think boxing is wildly profitable in general? I reckon it's tough, you need a love of the sport first and foremost I think.

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Posted: 09 Apr 2014, 07:13
by palooka

Do you think boxing is wildly profitable in general? I reckon it's tough, you need a love of the sport first and foremost I think
.[/quote]

I don't imagine it's like printing money and more than a few promoters, managers and trainers have their families involved so I imagine that they consider it a better way of making a good living than working in a 'normal' job.

For the younger Warrens and Eddie Hearn for instance, the hard graft - the getting into the sport, making contacts and the experience of who to work with and who can be trusted is done - they can reap the rewards though I imagine it's not as easy as it looks; I imagine it's a fair bit easier than getting punched around for a few hundred quid or shovelling 10 ton of hard core.

For the trainers and managers I realise that they must have a love of the sport (or an unhealthy interest in being around other men in a gym environment) some do well out of the sport and some put an awful lot of time in for little monetary reward (or it costs them money).

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Posted: 09 Apr 2014, 07:20
by black panther
Bit of a daft move to leave allegedly for Hennessy.

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Posted: 09 Apr 2014, 07:24
by palooka
Taansend wrote:
G0mez wrote:I reckon Eddie is going to try and make this a proper all-dayer of fights with a couple of mustard showdowns before the main event.
I agree, mate. This is not just about Froch v Groves but also about Eddie Hearns legacy on the sport. If the undercard is shite & the main event fails for whatever reason he'll be as pissed off as anyone.

He won't be as pissed of as me; he'll be able to console himself with the million or so quid he'll make that night and I'll have spent £15, worked myself into a fever of hate and anticipation and then been let down; it's happened before and it's not pretty to see.

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Posted: 10 Apr 2014, 07:49
by Sklar
I just hope Nigel Kennedy isn't playing the anthem.

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Posted: 10 Apr 2014, 07:55
by Taansend
James DeGale vs Brandon Gonzales has been added to the undercard. Final eliminator. Very good test for DeGale.

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Posted: 10 Apr 2014, 09:36
by ILikeBeer
Taansend wrote:James DeGale vs Brandon Gonzales has been added to the undercard. Final eliminator. Very good test for DeGale.
The Buture's Fright. :salut:

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Posted: 10 Apr 2014, 09:40
by SteveDow
I'd not heard of Gonzalez before but looking at his record Degale should be beating him fairly comfortably. He's had a lot of very close points wins and drew his fight before last.

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Posted: 10 Apr 2014, 09:42
by ILikeBeer
SteveDow wrote:I'd not heard of Gonzalez before but looking at his record Degale should be beating him fairly comfortably. He's had a lot of very close points wins and drew his fight before last.
I think that's probably the idea.

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Posted: 10 Apr 2014, 09:44
by palooka
ILikeBeer wrote:
SteveDow wrote:I'd not heard of Gonzalez before but looking at his record Degale should be beating him fairly comfortably. He's had a lot of very close points wins and drew his fight before last.
I think that's probably the idea.
You're too young to be so cynical.

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Posted: 10 Apr 2014, 10:01
by jackukmma
So far we have
Froch v Groves
Mitchell v Maduma IBF Eliminator
DeGale v Gonzales IBF Eliminator
Joshua v TBA

If Eddie hadn't done his usual of bigging the show up and bragging how good it would be, "at least 1, possibly 2 world title fight" "a massive domestic showdown" I'd of been well happy with that so far. With McDonell also likely to be in a eliminator it leaves a lot to be desired from what was originally promised

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Posted: 10 Apr 2014, 10:07
by Taansend
SteveDow wrote:I'd not heard of Gonzalez before but looking at his record Degale should be beating him fairly comfortably. He's had a lot of very close points wins and drew his fight before last.
That draw was against Thomas Oostenhuizen (excuse spelling) who is a decent enough prospect himself - although he needs to be at Light Heavy.

I wouldn't classify this as an easy fight for Degale.

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Posted: 10 Apr 2014, 12:12
by Cholo_cws
Should Froch-Groves end the way Hall-Ward did then what should be a 'great' night for British boxing may suddenly change to a Haye-Harrison type backlash. I would have thought that a decent undercard was some sort of insurance that that wouldn't be the case. Not good enough at the moment.

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Posted: 10 Apr 2014, 13:08
by Boxing Prospect
Taansend wrote:
SteveDow wrote:I'd not heard of Gonzalez before but looking at his record Degale should be beating him fairly comfortably. He's had a lot of very close points wins and drew his fight before last.
That draw was against Thomas Oostenhuizen (excuse spelling) who is a decent enough prospect himself - although he needs to be at Light Heavy.

I wouldn't classify this as an easy fight for Degale.
Tommy was HORRIBLE that night, gift draw for him there.

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Posted: 10 Apr 2014, 13:15
by lefty
Boxing Prospect wrote:
Taansend wrote:
SteveDow wrote:I'd not heard of Gonzalez before but looking at his record Degale should be beating him fairly comfortably. He's had a lot of very close points wins and drew his fight before last.
That draw was against Thomas Oostenhuizen (excuse spelling) who is a decent enough prospect himself - although he needs to be at Light Heavy.

I wouldn't classify this as an easy fight for Degale.
Tommy was HORRIBLE that night, gift draw for him there.
He's been dropped by his promoter aswell.

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Posted: 10 Apr 2014, 13:24
by ashedward
jackukmma wrote:So far we have
Froch v Groves
Mitchell v Maduma IBF Eliminator
DeGale v Gonzales IBF Eliminator
Joshua v TBA

If Eddie hadn't done his usual of bigging the show up and bragging how good it would be, "at least 1, possibly 2 world title fight" "a massive domestic showdown" I'd of been well happy with that so far. With McDonell also likely to be in a eliminator it leaves a lot to be desired from what was originally promised
You should still be happy and don`t get caught up with what Hearn says on ifilm nothing was promised,he also said expect two area title fights and anything else is a bonus I know he was joking but the point is not to take everything said to Kugan as a promise, just what he would try to make for the card.

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Posted: 10 Apr 2014, 20:08
by jackukmma
ashedward wrote:
jackukmma wrote:So far we have
Froch v Groves
Mitchell v Maduma IBF Eliminator
DeGale v Gonzales IBF Eliminator
Joshua v TBA

If Eddie hadn't done his usual of bigging the show up and bragging how good it would be, "at least 1, possibly 2 world title fight" "a massive domestic showdown" I'd of been well happy with that so far. With McDonell also likely to be in a eliminator it leaves a lot to be desired from what was originally promised
You should still be happy and don`t get caught up with what Hearn says on ifilm nothing was promised,he also said expect two area title fights and anything else is a bonus I know he was joking but the point is not to take everything said to Kugan as a promise, just what he would try to make for the card.
He downplayed it this time but still promised at least 1 world title possibly 2. Suppose if he's got McDonnell a shot at the WBA regular he's fulfilled his promise. If that comes off the undercard is the best PPV undercard he's produced by a mile

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Posted: 11 Apr 2014, 06:48
by ashedward
jackukmma wrote:
ashedward wrote:
jackukmma wrote:So far we have
Froch v Groves
Mitchell v Maduma IBF Eliminator
DeGale v Gonzales IBF Eliminator
Joshua v TBA

If Eddie hadn't done his usual of bigging the show up and bragging how good it would be, "at least 1, possibly 2 world title fight" "a massive domestic showdown" I'd of been well happy with that so far. With McDonell also likely to be in a eliminator it leaves a lot to be desired from what was originally promised
You should still be happy and don`t get caught up with what Hearn says on ifilm nothing was promised,he also said expect two area title fights and anything else is a bonus I know he was joking but the point is not to take everything said to Kugan as a promise, just what he would try to make for the card.
He downplayed it this time but still promised at least 1 world title possibly 2. Suppose if he's got McDonnell a shot at the WBA regular he's fulfilled his promise. If that comes off the undercard is the best PPV undercard he's produced by a mile
Fair play mate, I take what he says to Kugan on Ifilm with a pinch of salt because he gets carried away with talking about the fights he would like to make

Re: Froch v Groves Undercard

Posted: 11 Apr 2014, 08:35
by DMA1987
Noticed on his IFL chat yesterday he said 2 fights announced for the undercard next week one of which is a world.